This is also their last chance to convince anybody to do it. They have to get that control group down as small as possible, but their mission will have been accomplished. The death rate will be up for who knows how many years to come, and the birth rate will probably be down for a similar time.
It's so much easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission, eh?
In the UK, I think they’ll be able to bring forward future mortality (displaced mortality), and hide it within the current periods mortality.
Fertility will be somewhat similar, due to immigration. Mothers not born in the UK, have far more children, compared with mothers born in the UK.
As I understand it, one of the purposes of this exercise is to accelerate the invigoration of the UK population. They want a healthier, more intelligent, harder working, population, who have lower expectations, than than the indigenous population.
They'll be able to hide all kinds of stuff. They're already blaming every well known vax side effect on COVID long-term effects, and now that everybody's getting COVID, it'll be easy to say it was caused by the sickness, not the shot. And they won't fund any of the studies that want to compare to unvaxxed.
It seems way too early to judge fertility outcomes. Way too many variables during this first year of vaccination, coupled with so much illness, use of drugs & alcohol, etc.
The obvious conclusion was there was such an increase in miscarriages that it became impossible to ignore. However, long term fertility studies will take some time.
Where have you seen your data? Do you think somehow there is some characteristic of being Jewish that allows the Israeli people protection against infertility? Also, I believe in vitro treatments are covered by the government in Israel, could this be effecting data?
When the researcher steps back, it is assumed that a large amount of placebo was given in Israel, which would make sense for many reasons, fertility just being one.
I have a problem with the assumption: If a clinical study is being run, then the split should be 50:50 everywhere. In case it is not, then there is a very big why, with very serious implications.
You mean in terms of which trimester people got v@xxed? They did 80% third trimester and then still used those patients to calculate the miscarriage rate, which wouldn’t be appropriate at all, since a loss after 20 weeks (in your third trimester your long past this) would be a stillbirth, not a miscarriage.
This is also their last chance to convince anybody to do it. They have to get that control group down as small as possible, but their mission will have been accomplished. The death rate will be up for who knows how many years to come, and the birth rate will probably be down for a similar time.
It's so much easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission, eh?
In the UK, I think they’ll be able to bring forward future mortality (displaced mortality), and hide it within the current periods mortality.
Fertility will be somewhat similar, due to immigration. Mothers not born in the UK, have far more children, compared with mothers born in the UK.
As I understand it, one of the purposes of this exercise is to accelerate the invigoration of the UK population. They want a healthier, more intelligent, harder working, population, who have lower expectations, than than the indigenous population.
They'll be able to hide all kinds of stuff. They're already blaming every well known vax side effect on COVID long-term effects, and now that everybody's getting COVID, it'll be easy to say it was caused by the sickness, not the shot. And they won't fund any of the studies that want to compare to unvaxxed.
I totally agree.
Israel is different; it is the only jabbed country where fertility has not suffered, according to data.
It seems way too early to judge fertility outcomes. Way too many variables during this first year of vaccination, coupled with so much illness, use of drugs & alcohol, etc.
The obvious conclusion was there was such an increase in miscarriages that it became impossible to ignore. However, long term fertility studies will take some time.
Where have you seen your data? Do you think somehow there is some characteristic of being Jewish that allows the Israeli people protection against infertility? Also, I believe in vitro treatments are covered by the government in Israel, could this be effecting data?
I took the info in my stride and had no further need to think about it, so no speculations on my part. You may look here:
https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/10/08/study-concludes-womens-fertility-harmed-in-vaccinating-countries/
When the researcher steps back, it is assumed that a large amount of placebo was given in Israel, which would make sense for many reasons, fertility just being one.
I have a problem with the assumption: If a clinical study is being run, then the split should be 50:50 everywhere. In case it is not, then there is a very big why, with very serious implications.
You mean in terms of which trimester people got v@xxed? They did 80% third trimester and then still used those patients to calculate the miscarriage rate, which wouldn’t be appropriate at all, since a loss after 20 weeks (in your third trimester your long past this) would be a stillbirth, not a miscarriage.
Just glancing at the article, they’re using our very own NIH study of which I am VERY WELL familiar with and breaking it down.
Thanks! I have an interest in fertility for personal reasons! Will check it out :)