this is exactly why i think the tit for tat of using language that does not eliminate second class citizens but simply inverts who has to occupy that category might be emotionally satisfying, but it seems incredible destructive.
I disagree. Pushing back with mirror tactics is NOT dangerous ground.
Au Contraire.
It prepares the battlefield.
And make no mistake about it: this entire situation has NOTHING to do with a virus or toxic gene therapy jab. This is an existential battle between evil and good humans.
This jab is about nothing more than about compliance, not the effects of some chemical. The sickness and death is a sideshow, not the main event.
this is exactly why i think the tit for tat of using language that does not eliminate second class citizens but simply inverts who has to occupy that category might be emotionally satisfying, but it seems incredible destructive.
it's VERY dangerous ground to tread.
I disagree. Pushing back with mirror tactics is NOT dangerous ground.
Au Contraire.
It prepares the battlefield.
And make no mistake about it: this entire situation has NOTHING to do with a virus or toxic gene therapy jab. This is an existential battle between evil and good humans.
This jab is about nothing more than about compliance, not the effects of some chemical. The sickness and death is a sideshow, not the main event.
Agree
Be nice if you and Igor could stagger the timing of your post.
Help a brother. Trying to support both you guys....my favorites...:)
I asked him the same thing. LOL.
I probably won't get my wish though...;]
Wow. Just read your two postings on net risk/benefits of vaxxes.
Good for you. Audience was tough. Needed to be done imo.
Hope you didn't lose readership.
Nonetheless it was good to see you stick to first principles.
I know that can be tough. Especially in "business".
Anyways, cheers!