You're backpedaling on what you originally claimed.
It went from "the unvaccinated will all die due to the hubris of the vaccinated driving viral evolution" to "Geert has subtly been slightly sort of changing his message to perhaps suggest there might be some slight greater damage to the unvaccinated"
You used Geert's name to push a theory you had. Geert has been consistent that the unvaccinated will be fine overall.
Show me where I said the unvaxxed would all die of hubris.
See, these kinds of extreme statements are why we can't get anywhere on the subjects of this virus and vax.
I said Geert was now saying those with natural immunity could be harmed by a future variant that overcame their immunity. I linked to where he said it. It seems to me he said it pretty clearly.
When you expressed disbelief, I pointed out he had also said recently that the unvaxxed were safe "for the next variant" or "for this variant". Something like that. This was the first time I had seen him modify his reassurance in this way.
And again, the new messaging appears to match what a Ft. Detrick scientist and his Harvard-trained son are saying. You can find Dan Sirotkin on Twitter at @Harvard2H. He can be impatient with questions, but I have talked with him extensively.
I will not be replying to you or anyone else again on this subject. I provided the link.
You're backpedaling on what you originally claimed.
It went from "the unvaccinated will all die due to the hubris of the vaccinated driving viral evolution" to "Geert has subtly been slightly sort of changing his message to perhaps suggest there might be some slight greater damage to the unvaccinated"
You used Geert's name to push a theory you had. Geert has been consistent that the unvaccinated will be fine overall.
Show me where I said the unvaxxed would all die of hubris.
See, these kinds of extreme statements are why we can't get anywhere on the subjects of this virus and vax.
I said Geert was now saying those with natural immunity could be harmed by a future variant that overcame their immunity. I linked to where he said it. It seems to me he said it pretty clearly.
When you expressed disbelief, I pointed out he had also said recently that the unvaxxed were safe "for the next variant" or "for this variant". Something like that. This was the first time I had seen him modify his reassurance in this way.
And again, the new messaging appears to match what a Ft. Detrick scientist and his Harvard-trained son are saying. You can find Dan Sirotkin on Twitter at @Harvard2H. He can be impatient with questions, but I have talked with him extensively.
I will not be replying to you or anyone else again on this subject. I provided the link.
But we all starve so it's moot no?