I understand the disconnect. To be precise your assertion is that "the virus will eventually mutate in the vaxxed to the point where it will overcome natural immunity in the unvaxxed." That assertion equates "natural immunity" with perfect sterilizing immunity against reinfection. One can still have the benefit of natural immunity while getting reinfected. I think GVB would agree. But I understand your point, Yet, the "likelihood for previously asymptomatically infected people to become re-exposed will augment" is not the same as the contention that selectively advantaged mutations will escape natural immunity. And notice GVB used "re-exposed," not reinfected.
I understand the disconnect. To be precise your assertion is that "the virus will eventually mutate in the vaxxed to the point where it will overcome natural immunity in the unvaxxed." That assertion equates "natural immunity" with perfect sterilizing immunity against reinfection. One can still have the benefit of natural immunity while getting reinfected. I think GVB would agree. But I understand your point, Yet, the "likelihood for previously asymptomatically infected people to become re-exposed will augment" is not the same as the contention that selectively advantaged mutations will escape natural immunity. And notice GVB used "re-exposed," not reinfected.