"anti-vaxer" absolutely is a psy-op. Likely directly from the CIA lexicon - as "conspiracy theory/ist" demonstrably is. Notice how many people delivering video testimony of their (often horrific) vax injury - start by affirming "I am not an anti-vaxer" - there's the operation right there!
= =
I like the Dr Zelenko protocol for assessing "each medical intervention" - is it safe? is it effective? is it necessary?
Probably. But all vaccines as well as the new gene “therapies” are poisons. All the vaxxed versus unvaxxed studies show that unvaxxed is healthier.
So my answer to the psyop is psychological jiu jitsu, “Damn straight I am anti-vaxx. I don’t see how injecting liability-free poisons can improve anyone’s health.”
I think this "anti-vaxxer" label is a psy op.
These are consumer medical products, not Gods.
Just because you label something a "vaccine", and then change the definition when it fails...doesn't make it a God.
Each medical intervention should be reviewed on a risk-benefit analysis. This one failed miserably on every metric.
"anti-vaxer" absolutely is a psy-op. Likely directly from the CIA lexicon - as "conspiracy theory/ist" demonstrably is. Notice how many people delivering video testimony of their (often horrific) vax injury - start by affirming "I am not an anti-vaxer" - there's the operation right there!
= =
I like the Dr Zelenko protocol for assessing "each medical intervention" - is it safe? is it effective? is it necessary?
Agreed—-one should say they are a pro-informed consenter. This implies having the ability to critically think and use good clinical judgment.
Probably. But all vaccines as well as the new gene “therapies” are poisons. All the vaxxed versus unvaxxed studies show that unvaxxed is healthier.
So my answer to the psyop is psychological jiu jitsu, “Damn straight I am anti-vaxx. I don’t see how injecting liability-free poisons can improve anyone’s health.”
Well said, S M