What's dispiriting to note is how many knew something was seriously off and remained silent in the face of it. Paycheck>>>Integrity, apparently.
If the goal was simply to get people enrolled in a digital ID system, why not go with a run-of-the-mill attenuated virus vaccine...or saline? Nope, mRNA it was! For everyone. I cannot think of a single innocent explanation as to why the authorities pushed to get a needle into every arm, since the virus posed almost no risk to healthy people under 70 yo.
Precisely. It doesn't make sense if the goal was public health; nor does it make sense if the goal was a giant fakeout to herd people into digital ID or whatever. It follows that they're up to something extremely dark.
depopulation...gates stated it in his ted talk...to paraphrase, if we do a good job with birth control and vaccines we will slow population growth and reduce carbon emissions
I think maybe they believed that mRNA technology was the magic bullet that would lead to a cure for a multitude of maladies from viruses to cancer and everything in between.
Like the introduction of functions in early programming languages, they thought it had the potential to revolutionize the field. mRNA technology was believed to be a similar game changer, malleable, and general enough to enable it to be recruited to do whatever particular tweek was needed to get the body to heal itself.
If thousands of deaths in the short term were necessary to save millions in the future, they rationalised that to be an ethical exchange.
Maybe, but it is unethical to sacrifice unwitting thousands to save millions down the line.
We are dealing with incredibly wealthy sociopaths who have gained control of many governments throughout the world. There are billions of us polluting their planet. They are not about the business of improving our lives. More like culling the herd, I fear. Nothing that's happened since vaccines rolled out has budged me off this apocalyptic scenario. In fact, most things that transpired since then affirm it. God help us.
The mRNA tech probably does have enormous potential. But what early testing had been done was spotty and disappointing. I fully agree that the mRNA products should never have been approved. But that's because they haven't been adequately tested for safety or efficacy. I concur that what is going on now is a monstrosity of greed and power-seeking at the least, and could have darker motives.
But none of the above precludes, in the least, the possibility that mRNA might prove a great technology if/when they overcome its obvious bugs.
What's dispiriting to note is how many knew something was seriously off and remained silent in the face of it. Paycheck>>>Integrity, apparently.
If the goal was simply to get people enrolled in a digital ID system, why not go with a run-of-the-mill attenuated virus vaccine...or saline? Nope, mRNA it was! For everyone. I cannot think of a single innocent explanation as to why the authorities pushed to get a needle into every arm, since the virus posed almost no risk to healthy people under 70 yo.
Something very evil is going on.
Precisely. It doesn't make sense if the goal was public health; nor does it make sense if the goal was a giant fakeout to herd people into digital ID or whatever. It follows that they're up to something extremely dark.
depopulation...gates stated it in his ted talk...to paraphrase, if we do a good job with birth control and vaccines we will slow population growth and reduce carbon emissions
I think maybe they believed that mRNA technology was the magic bullet that would lead to a cure for a multitude of maladies from viruses to cancer and everything in between.
Like the introduction of functions in early programming languages, they thought it had the potential to revolutionize the field. mRNA technology was believed to be a similar game changer, malleable, and general enough to enable it to be recruited to do whatever particular tweek was needed to get the body to heal itself.
If thousands of deaths in the short term were necessary to save millions in the future, they rationalised that to be an ethical exchange.
Maybe, but it is unethical to sacrifice unwitting thousands to save millions down the line.
We are dealing with incredibly wealthy sociopaths who have gained control of many governments throughout the world. There are billions of us polluting their planet. They are not about the business of improving our lives. More like culling the herd, I fear. Nothing that's happened since vaccines rolled out has budged me off this apocalyptic scenario. In fact, most things that transpired since then affirm it. God help us.
The mRNA tech probably does have enormous potential. But what early testing had been done was spotty and disappointing. I fully agree that the mRNA products should never have been approved. But that's because they haven't been adequately tested for safety or efficacy. I concur that what is going on now is a monstrosity of greed and power-seeking at the least, and could have darker motives.
But none of the above precludes, in the least, the possibility that mRNA might prove a great technology if/when they overcome its obvious bugs.
Yes. This might offer insight: https://themariachiyears.substack.com/p/covid-vaccines-as-the-aschen-agenda?s=w
Excellent essay and compilation of videos.
Neuralink & meta verse.