They're idiots if they don't think EVERYONE will use this as an answer to mandates, and justly so.
The defense, of course, is that a statement by Brandon that "X is over" is neither a legally binding nor technically meaningful statement, but that would involve openly admitting that a President's statements in a public address carry no actual weight.
They're idiots if they don't think EVERYONE will use this as an answer to mandates, and justly so.
The defense, of course, is that a statement by Brandon that "X is over" is neither a legally binding nor technically meaningful statement, but that would involve openly admitting that a President's statements in a public address carry no actual weight.
Again not a problem. You did not hear what you heard, it didn't happen, it was taken out of context. What a difference a few days makes, eh?