Pottinger was the op lead and tried to pull this whole operation off under Trump. Patruschev told Pompeous that FSB would hold a public pandemic tribunal at the University in Novosibirsk that would reveal that the virus as a joint operation between pro-China fifth column in US centered around Gates Thiel Schmidt, etc. and DNC (Silicon Valley really likes what it sees in China's social credit score and wants it here) and the pro-US fifth column in China. So, the US stood down on that op, and Trump in short order went from daily threats about China virus to complete radio silence. Now it's back on the plate again under Sleepy Joe Chernenko. By the way, important to note that Russia and China have extensive coordination now on important points, including the string of more than 30 bioweapons labs in post-Soviet space and China's near abroad. The Lugar center in tiblisi gets a lot of attention because the Georgians have given bioweapons engineers diplomatic status so they can bring blood and specimens back and forth from Detrick in diplomatic pouches. But any one of those labs could have made a virus to release in China, or it might simply have leaked from WIV. Interesting that China and Iran were initially hard hit, and Iran is a key node in the Eurasian integration project. Lots of tactical and strategic overlap between the Ukraine line of contact op, which was run by Torn N and Li'l Blinkin, and this revived China virus op. Ishchenko and Escobar have done detailed explanations of same. Ischenko from the operation standpoint and Escobar from the political standpoint. Three important elements of the kind of escalation dominance that Russia used to tits-up the Ukraine op are 1. the ability to move two airbone batalions and three army batallions to the border in under 10 days (It would take NATO six months to move half that) and 2 the announcement that "decision-making centers" (Brussels and DC) would be targeted in any conflict and 3. the ability to close Hormuz, which would spike oil prices sufficiently to detonate the $2.5 quadrillion derivatives nightmare. Again, if you want to know where Facui fits into the larger picture, he needs to be put in the larger context of a media-created public entity, not unlike AOC, who serve a useful function. In short, a prop.
Pottinger was the op lead and tried to pull this whole operation off under Trump. Patruschev told Pompeous that FSB would hold a public pandemic tribunal at the University in Novosibirsk that would reveal that the virus as a joint operation between pro-China fifth column in US centered around Gates Thiel Schmidt, etc. and DNC (Silicon Valley really likes what it sees in China's social credit score and wants it here) and the pro-US fifth column in China. So, the US stood down on that op, and Trump in short order went from daily threats about China virus to complete radio silence. Now it's back on the plate again under Sleepy Joe Chernenko. By the way, important to note that Russia and China have extensive coordination now on important points, including the string of more than 30 bioweapons labs in post-Soviet space and China's near abroad. The Lugar center in tiblisi gets a lot of attention because the Georgians have given bioweapons engineers diplomatic status so they can bring blood and specimens back and forth from Detrick in diplomatic pouches. But any one of those labs could have made a virus to release in China, or it might simply have leaked from WIV. Interesting that China and Iran were initially hard hit, and Iran is a key node in the Eurasian integration project. Lots of tactical and strategic overlap between the Ukraine line of contact op, which was run by Torn N and Li'l Blinkin, and this revived China virus op. Ishchenko and Escobar have done detailed explanations of same. Ischenko from the operation standpoint and Escobar from the political standpoint. Three important elements of the kind of escalation dominance that Russia used to tits-up the Ukraine op are 1. the ability to move two airbone batalions and three army batallions to the border in under 10 days (It would take NATO six months to move half that) and 2 the announcement that "decision-making centers" (Brussels and DC) would be targeted in any conflict and 3. the ability to close Hormuz, which would spike oil prices sufficiently to detonate the $2.5 quadrillion derivatives nightmare. Again, if you want to know where Facui fits into the larger picture, he needs to be put in the larger context of a media-created public entity, not unlike AOC, who serve a useful function. In short, a prop.
thankyou so much for this set of comments Casey
Glad to help.