131 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Another revelatory data-sleuthing exposé!

“the order of occurrence matters greatly”—I find this of particular interest given the statement I shared from Dr. Malone about the vaccine only encoding for the spike protein, which leaves 28 proteins the vaxxed’s immune system is unable to mount a response to. If the infection occurs prior to vaccination, however, natural immunity has been developed, putting the person in a better position to fight off breakthrough infection post-injection (actually, does anyone know if breakthrough infections occur for those who achieved natural immunity prior to injection?) …

That said, Dr. Mike Yeadon advises it is dangerous to vaccinate someone with natural immunity due to the heightened risk for adverse events, as per this recent comment (https://lauradodsworth.substack.com/p/i-love-my-job-but-i-wont-be-jabbed/comments):

DR. MIKE YEADON: It’s actively dangerous to vaccinate a person known to be already immune to the protein used in a vaccine.

In this case, we aren’t using conventional, protein-based agents. Usually this takes the form of the pathogen itself, grown in culture, then killed by heating or by adding a chemical which breaks up the protein. This format of vaccine has a century-long record of protecting people from infection by that pathogen as well as to prevent clinical illness. It’s the base case that they usually attenuate if not halt transmission. Finally, with rare exceptions, they’re generally very safe. So they should be. In fact, MUST be. Why? Because the contract is this: a perfectly healthy person shows up at the clinic. They get vaccinated. They leave in the same good health & will remain so.

There is no situation in which it’s acceptable even for a minority to be injured, crippled or killed by a vaccine.

Like I said, on rare occasion, and we don’t understand why, a conventional vaccine turns out to have adverse effects (AEs). In 2009, a rushed vaccine against swine flu was determined to have killed a few dozen people & injured thousands (the most-noted, serious AE was narcolepsy, in which some people can slide into a form of sleep, without warning. The most infamous case was in Sweden, where hundreds of children were permanently damaged in this way. Compensation has been paid, iirc by the U.K. government.

Importantly, the vaccine was withdrawn.

It’s worth knowing that most countries simply simply couldn’t find the strain of influenza in question.

Though most people don’t know it, the whole event was faked by the pharmaceutical industry & well-placed academics. PCR testing, deliberately used badly, coupled with implausibly dire projections of a wave of deaths (from a notoriously unreliable modeller) & a corrupt WHO, orchestrating the criminal enterprise.

In all probability, tech companies have modified how browser searches no longer find much information about this fraud.

Some of you will recall Jon Snow of UK’s Channel 4 News interviewing a German physician, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg. Wodarg was a public health Doctor in a northern town in Germany. He was also a minor politician, having bern elected as our equivalent of an MP. As there were so few technically qualified people in Parliament, he became the leader of a medical subcommittee & ultimately of an EU liaison group. So it happened that Wolfgang, once he realised that it was a fraud, was able quickly to network & to build alliances, including within the EU & WHO. Eventually, those protecting the perpetrators realised they were discovered (eg the Channel 4 News interview) & declared the pandemic to be at an end. Billions in unused vaccines & ineffective antivirals were lost. No sanctions were placed upon the medical academics in China, who faked the number of sick & dead victims of Influenza-like illness. Nor on European academics who developed untrustworthy PCR tests Nor even on the pharmaceutical companies or their fellow conspirators in public offices responsible for negotiating contracts activated by WHO declaring a Pandemic and a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” (PHEIC: pronounced “fake”).

In brief, far fewer people died, even “with Swine Flu”, than the Imperial College modellers warned about.

Additionally, it turned out that the PCR test as specified was mostly finding false positives. The effect of this was the so-called “second wave” was retrospectively named as an example of a “PCR false positive pseudo epidemic”.

This has happened before, on more than one occasion, one of which is so stark that those who dismiss all of these facts as conspiracy theories still insist it’s impossible to fake pandemic.

The most notorious example of a genuine pseudo epidemic was of whooping cough. There was an apparent outbreak of hundreds of staff & patients at a hospital in north east USA. After weeks of panic, the final damaging explanation was that all the tests were performed in one PCR lab & there was invisible contamination of the laboratory bench.

NOT A SINGLE REAL CASE of whooping cough was identified by bacterial culture of clinical specimens. Furthermore, none of the apparently sick children or staff member was found to have circulating antibodies.

I believe that this was an honest mistake & all participants genuinely believed that the biggest outbreak of whooping cough had happened.

I recall being struck, upon first reading about this event, that it might well have been the inspiration for the covid19 fraud.

The novel technology, gene-based “vaccines” are nothing like conventional vaccines. I’m certain that the very design of them, all causing expression of spike protein, is the central & shared design flaw, and thus has led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, dominated by disorders of clotting & bleeding.

If a person who is immune to SARS-CoV-2 virus is then vaccinated, their risks of serious AEs & even death is greatly increased. No responsible doctor recommends this. We know for certain that this is true. It’s obvious & inevitable. Yet JCVI recommends vaccination even if recovered from the virus. You should have zero doubt that they know full well how dangerous this is.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Thank you for this information....it's very valuable and useful commentary....it's going into my reference files.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Great to hear. We are extremely fortunate to have Dr. Yeadon as part of the Substack community.

Expand full comment
BigT's avatar

That was an excellent comment. I’ve copied it into a note file. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Glad you found it useful! Dr. Yeadon deserves all the credit :-)

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

Bottom line, most doctors are NOT “responsible” as it is used in the closing paragraph. They ARE responsible for the harm they are inflicting. Will they be held accountable?

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Why didn't you name Neil Ferguson? I still try to read original sources, and finding him among the authors raises my credibility filter. Add any others you use as lie detectors. Thanks, R

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Not sure what you mean? This seems to be lacking context, or maybe you intended it as a response to someone else’s comment …

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Sorry, I must have misfired- Imperial College was mentioned in one of the posts, I thought it was this one.R

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Haha, thanks for clearing up the mystery!

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Rereading Dr. Yeadon's post- he does mention the "notoriously unreliable modeller." We were supposed to have 100 million Covid deaths.

Expand full comment