Take the time to read the actual study linked here and learn it and be ready to reference it when challenged. We can only beat this if we know our stuff and can defend our position. More great work, gato.
And here is an important pearl from the discussion section:
"Our data on Covid-19 hospitalized patients with severe disease has too few cases for a definitive analysis but does not seem to support a recent report 22 that suggests that vaccinated individuals were more protected than previously infected individuals 3 to 6 months after the immunity-conferring event."
Let me translate, "the study cited by Dr. Walensky and her cronies in the USA claiming vaccination is 5x better than natural immunity is a useless and totally bogus turd. We just don't have enough power in our study to refute it directly so we added this backhanded comment. We suggest you (the global body of medicine) ignore any statements made by Dr. Walensky or Dr. Fauci as they cite bad data to support their preferred narrative that your immune system is useless without their shots" - okay, so maybe I did editorialize this just a bit for emphasis....
Walensky et al want to erase all prior observation and knowledge about natural immunity. Personally, I think it's pretty arrogant to claim (especially at this point in time) that man is able to create a a vax that supersedes natural immunity's ability to protect again illness. After many years of vaccine failure with mRNA vaxxes, it's quite a stretch to believe that suddenly they've got it right and have beat nature. I'm not buying it in the least. This is yet another mRNA failure.
Take the time to read the actual study linked here and learn it and be ready to reference it when challenged. We can only beat this if we know our stuff and can defend our position. More great work, gato.
And here is an important pearl from the discussion section:
"Our data on Covid-19 hospitalized patients with severe disease has too few cases for a definitive analysis but does not seem to support a recent report 22 that suggests that vaccinated individuals were more protected than previously infected individuals 3 to 6 months after the immunity-conferring event."
Let me translate, "the study cited by Dr. Walensky and her cronies in the USA claiming vaccination is 5x better than natural immunity is a useless and totally bogus turd. We just don't have enough power in our study to refute it directly so we added this backhanded comment. We suggest you (the global body of medicine) ignore any statements made by Dr. Walensky or Dr. Fauci as they cite bad data to support their preferred narrative that your immune system is useless without their shots" - okay, so maybe I did editorialize this just a bit for emphasis....
Walensky et al want to erase all prior observation and knowledge about natural immunity. Personally, I think it's pretty arrogant to claim (especially at this point in time) that man is able to create a a vax that supersedes natural immunity's ability to protect again illness. After many years of vaccine failure with mRNA vaxxes, it's quite a stretch to believe that suddenly they've got it right and have beat nature. I'm not buying it in the least. This is yet another mRNA failure.