The hypothesis-- presented as a conclusion-- developed around the same time the new "vaccines" were released, was that vaccine-modulated immunity to this virus would be superior to that gained by infection. That was a very strange cart being put before the horse. The subsequent, continued attempts to justify this conclusion are just as lousy as one would expect from a total abandonment of the scientific method.
If I were grading this science fair project, I'd say go back to the drawing board and find a project you're really curious about, not a faith-based exercise you're hoping to exploit the tools of science for the purposes of proselytizing.
The hypothesis-- presented as a conclusion-- developed around the same time the new "vaccines" were released, was that vaccine-modulated immunity to this virus would be superior to that gained by infection. That was a very strange cart being put before the horse. The subsequent, continued attempts to justify this conclusion are just as lousy as one would expect from a total abandonment of the scientific method.
If I were grading this science fair project, I'd say go back to the drawing board and find a project you're really curious about, not a faith-based exercise you're hoping to exploit the tools of science for the purposes of proselytizing.