603 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Ryan Gardner's avatar

It only took one "inside" person with info or deliberately planning for a softness in the zone...or just looking away...or guilt by ommission.

Expand full comment
neener's avatar

Like one head officer who says "It's too dang hot on the roof, we can see just as well and aim through these windows if we need to and the AC in here feels pretty good!"

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

one word: Uvalde

Expand full comment
roi's avatar

I was thinking same.

My husband and I talking about homes still without power in Houston. How trimming trees and asking for help somehow was skipped.

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

That thought had occurred Saturday eve, over here.

Expand full comment
Hoffmeister's avatar

Exactly. If it was just an issue of " zone security ", incompetence could be a stand alone option. But, a BIG BUT, when you add in factors such as - ....by any means necessary, Trump cannot be...., or, that the shooter fits the profile - manipulated loner, drugged?, known to and used by intel agencies/operators, or that the shooter knew to access that location and have a ladder somewhere accessible -as if he was provided those details, pre-planning and prior scouting has never been a strong suit for impulse actors. There's a point where B.S. is an acceptable conclusion, without adding on the TOTAL LACK OF credibility of Fed investigating agencies.

Expand full comment
Pi Guy's avatar

Whenever we do IT Security Refresher Training they always start with Physical Security.

It doesn't have to be too sophisticated if someone can just wander on in like they own the place.

Expand full comment
Jimmy Gleeson's avatar

In this case...simply not looking up.

Expand full comment