Sometimes the most difficult decisions to make are the ones that require the exhaustive effort, in an acute crisis (under the pressure of time and scrutiny) with a lot of unknowns, to identify and feel certain that "doing nothing" is the ONLY solution....and to be confident you can "sell" it as the only solution not in search of the problem of unintended consequences
Instead he did NOTHING but sell unintended consequences as solutions, because just doing "something" doesn't require the hard work of analyzing options individually and against each other for unintended consequences.
Doing nothing is the easy way out in a situation where doing "nothing" is hard for people to accept as the best solution. It's much easier to make people do "hard" things when they're scared and know "nothing"
The people knew "nothing" because their leaders did not want doing nothing as an option. Its easier to keep them scared vs. having them question if you did the hard work of making sure doing nothing was the benchmark for measuring all other options.
This was the easiest decision all time, and yet they chose to make it incredibly hard, because they will never understand that doing nothing rarely has unintended consequences, but most "solutions" do when unintended consequences are not part of the analysis.
Makes you think the plandemic was the "solution" looking for problems. Maybe unintended consequences were the only solutions worth analyzing after all?
There's nothing to learn folks. THE SCIENCE has all the answers to intentionally create unintended consequences as "solutions" for any "problem" we feel you need. When in doubt of a problem, please consult THE ALMIGHTY CONSENSUS.
Sometimes the most difficult decisions to make are the ones that require the exhaustive effort, in an acute crisis (under the pressure of time and scrutiny) with a lot of unknowns, to identify and feel certain that "doing nothing" is the ONLY solution....and to be confident you can "sell" it as the only solution not in search of the problem of unintended consequences
Instead he did NOTHING but sell unintended consequences as solutions, because just doing "something" doesn't require the hard work of analyzing options individually and against each other for unintended consequences.
Doing nothing is the easy way out in a situation where doing "nothing" is hard for people to accept as the best solution. It's much easier to make people do "hard" things when they're scared and know "nothing"
The people knew "nothing" because their leaders did not want doing nothing as an option. Its easier to keep them scared vs. having them question if you did the hard work of making sure doing nothing was the benchmark for measuring all other options.
This was the easiest decision all time, and yet they chose to make it incredibly hard, because they will never understand that doing nothing rarely has unintended consequences, but most "solutions" do when unintended consequences are not part of the analysis.
Makes you think the plandemic was the "solution" looking for problems. Maybe unintended consequences were the only solutions worth analyzing after all?
There's nothing to learn folks. THE SCIENCE has all the answers to intentionally create unintended consequences as "solutions" for any "problem" we feel you need. When in doubt of a problem, please consult THE ALMIGHTY CONSENSUS.
Easy call. Hard times ahead.