I understand that, BUT (there's always a but), there's a Senator in Australia who's currently running an enquiry into the whole issue of C19 and taking evidence from many eminently qualified experts. Take a look at this (I've just come across it earlier today): https://rumble.com/v1guylt-covid-inquiry-2.0-11-james-rowe.html
Listen to what he says about the different strengths of the shots and what he says about what was initially approved was NOT what went into manufacture.
It doesnt matter. The EUA was his doing. All that follows makes him culpable. He made a choice and choices have consequences. The data of death and injury during initial trials was avaialble by the end of October 2020. The FDA discussed it in one of their virtual meetings. If I knew it at the time, he has no excuse. If you want to think he is innocent and make excuses for his willing actions, that's your decison. But blood is on his hands. He promoted the same lies as the rest of them.
I understand that, BUT (there's always a but), there's a Senator in Australia who's currently running an enquiry into the whole issue of C19 and taking evidence from many eminently qualified experts. Take a look at this (I've just come across it earlier today): https://rumble.com/v1guylt-covid-inquiry-2.0-11-james-rowe.html
Listen to what he says about the different strengths of the shots and what he says about what was initially approved was NOT what went into manufacture.
It doesnt matter. The EUA was his doing. All that follows makes him culpable. He made a choice and choices have consequences. The data of death and injury during initial trials was avaialble by the end of October 2020. The FDA discussed it in one of their virtual meetings. If I knew it at the time, he has no excuse. If you want to think he is innocent and make excuses for his willing actions, that's your decison. But blood is on his hands. He promoted the same lies as the rest of them.
wow!