Mostly correct, but I suspect you're wrong about claiming giving the "vaccine" to servicemembers was illegal.
Under FDA EUA guidelines, informed consent is suggested but not required. Relevant to the miltiary, see section "46." : The military may be denied even that tenuous option (10 U.S.C. 1107a). In other words, the government can force military to take an EUA product. Curiously, this same section has a provision requiring the government to provide a notice of the EUA to the solider or next of kin after the fact, if not done beforehand. [This is laid out in the default tortured legalese, but that is my take.]
Perhaps you were thinking of earlier vaccine disasters in the military? For example, I read (perhaps in RFK Jr. book?) that the Anthrax vaccines a few decades ago were truly experimental, not having even received an EUA status. Possibly those were violations of law. But what the heck? That hasn't stopped any number of government actions, has it?
There is a group of military members filing suit over this EUA vax because a vaccine was actually approved and not used but DOD kept using the EUA vax. They cited several illegal moves by DOD. Of course with this administration it’s all about who’s getting paid not who or what is best. Gotta use those billions they ordered 🤬
Mostly correct, but I suspect you're wrong about claiming giving the "vaccine" to servicemembers was illegal.
Under FDA EUA guidelines, informed consent is suggested but not required. Relevant to the miltiary, see section "46." : The military may be denied even that tenuous option (10 U.S.C. 1107a). In other words, the government can force military to take an EUA product. Curiously, this same section has a provision requiring the government to provide a notice of the EUA to the solider or next of kin after the fact, if not done beforehand. [This is laid out in the default tortured legalese, but that is my take.]
Perhaps you were thinking of earlier vaccine disasters in the military? For example, I read (perhaps in RFK Jr. book?) that the Anthrax vaccines a few decades ago were truly experimental, not having even received an EUA status. Possibly those were violations of law. But what the heck? That hasn't stopped any number of government actions, has it?
Links below:
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/emergency-use-authorization-medical-products-and-related-authorities
https://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@title10/subtitleA/part2/chapter55&edition=prelim
There is a group of military members filing suit over this EUA vax because a vaccine was actually approved and not used but DOD kept using the EUA vax. They cited several illegal moves by DOD. Of course with this administration it’s all about who’s getting paid not who or what is best. Gotta use those billions they ordered 🤬