Central planners might always lose, but sometimes it takes decades or centuries. I read Schwab's Fourth Industrial Revolution and most of what they identified as turning point technology was for surveillance and monitoring. (Much of the rest was transhumanist stuff to allow the rich to dream of their own immortality.) Obviously, the reason the WEF and friends are interested in surveillance tech is because they know how unpopular their rule will become.
Personally, I think a techno-surveillance state like China is essentially impossible to resist from the grassroots. Organization of resistance is virtually impossible to hide. Only a massive, extended economic failure would generate dissent widely enough and the interlinkage of the Chinese economy with the West forestalls that indefinitely.
The WEF is anticipating introducing mass surveillance into every western country and then what? If twenty percent of the people resisted all at once, it is true the authorities or their troops might not have the stomach for sufficient violence. Thus they will pursue conscienceless automation of killing. Before that arrives, I guess they can recruit from the people responding to this survey:
However apparent the failure of the globalists and their hatchetmen are to you and I, there are a great many people who enjoy their communally anointed positions of petty tyranny. They would be eager camp guards.
I hold out a faint hope that extreme drubbing at the midterm elections here in the U.S. might slow things down for a while, but dismantling the institutions of state oppression is a far off dream.
Central planners might always lose, but sometimes it takes decades or centuries. I read Schwab's Fourth Industrial Revolution and most of what they identified as turning point technology was for surveillance and monitoring. (Much of the rest was transhumanist stuff to allow the rich to dream of their own immortality.) Obviously, the reason the WEF and friends are interested in surveillance tech is because they know how unpopular their rule will become.
Personally, I think a techno-surveillance state like China is essentially impossible to resist from the grassroots. Organization of resistance is virtually impossible to hide. Only a massive, extended economic failure would generate dissent widely enough and the interlinkage of the Chinese economy with the West forestalls that indefinitely.
The WEF is anticipating introducing mass surveillance into every western country and then what? If twenty percent of the people resisted all at once, it is true the authorities or their troops might not have the stomach for sufficient violence. Thus they will pursue conscienceless automation of killing. Before that arrives, I guess they can recruit from the people responding to this survey:
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/poll-finds-close-half-democratic-voters-want-covid-internment-camps-unvaxxd
However apparent the failure of the globalists and their hatchetmen are to you and I, there are a great many people who enjoy their communally anointed positions of petty tyranny. They would be eager camp guards.
I hold out a faint hope that extreme drubbing at the midterm elections here in the U.S. might slow things down for a while, but dismantling the institutions of state oppression is a far off dream.
I see your point, I really do.
But polls have been seriously wrong. Jus sayin