348 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
RLM RLM's avatar

The answer to that question is easy. I knew 911 was a scam on day 2. It's simple. What does the media tell us that's true? Why do we believe a media that wholly controlled owned by the same.conglomerates? They are a for profit model where there is no check and balance and no source can ever be divulged. Because it's rigged. The whole thing. The issue is people are too scared to believe most of what we see and hear is BS. The left and right exist to keep us enslaved. Biden is a puppet and Musk and Trump are actors.

Listen. When the mass media and polticans are screaming right is left., when they tell you if you look left you're a conspiracy theorist, un-American, selfish,

or anything at all, run the other way. The media is there to control you with lies, they're owned by communists.. Nothing really is more obvious. If any of you actually believe 911 I urge you to investigate one thing and one thing only, no not the dancing Mossad Israelis celebrating as they watched the towers fall, but that's always interesting....building 7. Do you know anything about it?? Building 7 was part of the world trade center complex but NOT either of the towers that everyone knows fell bur a 3rd. Look it up. It was a 47 story skyscraper that was not hit by anything BUT idisengrated into its own footprint in the most obvious demolition anyone has ever seen. How did they get away with anything so obvious and almost no one knew? Even most of you reading this id bet doesn't know.. stop believing people and organizations who are not your friend they you don't know. Even believing a friend or someone you know is no guarantee of truth.

Expand full comment
Invisible Sun's avatar

Why would WTC-7 need to be demolished as part of the 9/11 conspiracy? It is understandable that WTC-7 would be demolished as part of the cleanup. What purpose did it serve to plan to take down WTC-7 if WTC-1 and WTC-2 were going to be taken down? Most people have no idea about the WTC-7 story which means WTC-7 is superfluous to the official 9/11 narrative.

Put simply, why would plotters add WTC-7 to the mix of mischief when it seems completely unnecessary to the plot?

Expand full comment
RLM RLM's avatar

I think you're misunderstanding what I'm writing. What do you mean? How often do 47 story skyscapers disengrate into their own footprint? I'll tell you. After 6 weeks of set up to demolish it. Let me ask you a question. This building fell into it's own footprint at 5 PM on 911. How is this NOT part of it? What kind of a question is that? How isn't it part of it? It's buidling 7 of the WTC complex that was detonated to implode. Why did they detonate it? The headquarters of multiple government agencies were in the building. They had to cover up where 911 was funded and planned?? Also the committe investgating where 2B dollars disappeared from the Pentagon went was there as well. My brother was working at the Pentagon that day and I can assure you what hit the buidling was not a commercial aircraft. Anyone with an open mind and eyes can see that. No people, no landing gear, no seats, no fussilage, one engine that was not a commercial aircraft engine, and there was one HOLE in the buidling, no wing marks, nothing. NO BODIES! Are you serious about 911? Muslims? A passport on the ground from one plane? Are you now going to ask me where the people went now because I said a plane DID NOT hit the pentagoni? I have found that everyone who cannot undrestand that this could happen or has a block beleving this could happen asks the most incredibly mundane questions that really don't make any sense at all, like your question/comment. I'm not trying to be rude but reading what you wrote is mind boggling that you would even think to ask those questions based on what I wrote. A state of the art 47 story skyscaper on 911 disengrated into it's own footprint at 5PM on 911 and instead of focusing on the obvious you are asking this. Maybe you don't understand how long it takes to detonate a 47 story building to fall? So you think in the chaos of 911 on 911 they were able to get a team to load the building to detonate? Buildings like that take multiple weeks to fill with charges.

I would bet my life and the life of EVERYONE I love, 911 was a scam, it couldn't be more obvious. Corona would have never happened if not for 911. They created a rash of Gov't agencies to spy and control us. They justified war in Iraq over this. Lied about WMD's. They didn't tell us the truth about anything. The sooner you realize you are living a lie, the more free you will be. 911 was the beggning of the end.

Expand full comment
NY's avatar

Anyone who is the least bit curious about 9/11 should watch 9/11 New Pearl Harbor.

Expand full comment
RLM RLM's avatar

Exactly. That and a rash of other movies on the subject as well. Anyone who cares to know and has an open mind can learn it was nothing like what they told us. .

Expand full comment
Featherjourney's avatar

Building 7 was key for many!

Expand full comment
RLM RLM's avatar

THE smoking gun with the hand attached,

Expand full comment
Invisible Sun's avatar

I am curious why conspirators would add extraneous pieces to the plot - why complicate things? Why, as you say, do something that is so obviously unnatural? I think it is fair to question narratives and that means questioning all narratives.

I do believe the American government benefitted from 9/11. Evidence also shows agencies of the American government supported the attack - they assisted the attackers and cleared the way for it to happen. To what end were bombings and demolitions staged I have no idea. You and others have strong claims the proof is convincing. I simply don't know.

Expand full comment
RLM RLM's avatar

I don't know why you keep saying that. Are you an agent provocateur or are you sincerely asking these questions?? I ask because you're not making sense. If you believe the US govenment suported the attack and benefitted from 911 why are you asking questions like this? Your question is not a fair question because it's not logical and assumes incorrect information.

Let's focus on one thing. HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE A 47 STORY SKYSCRAPER TO BE FILLED WITH EXPLOSIVES SO IT FALLS DIRECTLY ONTO ITSELF?? IF you're a real person and not a bot or someone trying to throw the rest off the trail, answer that question, stay on point, don't be like the media and confuse things. Answer that question. please. WHY? BECAUSE IF you answer that question truthfully with facts, you won't be making anymore comments because you'd know this was planned WELL in advance. AND THAT IS THE POINT.

Expand full comment
Invisible Sun's avatar

Why was it part of the plan? What purpose did it serve?

Expand full comment
Thoughtful's avatar

RLM already answered this. That building contained evidence that government agencies needed destroyed. It was also owned by parties with convenient (recently acquired) insurance policies that paid huge cash payments.

The purposes served are: enrichment of private parties, money laundering for DOD, destruction of evidence of crimes by other parties.

Expand full comment
RLM RLM's avatar

Figure it out on your own, I don't have time to spoon feed you. Plus ive already answered the question. You're likely here to confuse. Probably sitting in a Mossad controlled call center. You're attempting to twist what's logical and obvious while you move from facts that matter to facts that have no bearing. Your comment is useless and doesn't matter. It is what it is. They detonated the building and it was planned long in advance. Those are the facts. Nothing else is material. If you're not a plant your not bright enough to understand, i cant help with that either. Hey Cat , I'd vet this subscriber as a plant.

Expand full comment
Satan's Doorknob's avatar

I'll admit I haven't gone down the 9-11 rabbit hole, just a few quick reality checks, please. No I didn't see the actual events, but I did see news reports that day and on following days. There were eyewitnesses, plenty of them, for both the first and the second plane impacts. There were videos too, especially of the 2nd. None of that is to say no conspriacy, but...

Expand full comment