Why would WTC-7 need to be demolished as part of the 9/11 conspiracy? It is understandable that WTC-7 would be demolished as part of the cleanup. What purpose did it serve to plan to take down WTC-7 if WTC-1 and WTC-2 were going to be taken down? Most people have no idea about the WTC-7 story which means WTC-7 is superfluous to the official 9/11 narrative.
Put simply, why would plotters add WTC-7 to the mix of mischief when it seems completely unnecessary to the plot?
I think you're misunderstanding what I'm writing. What do you mean? How often do 47 story skyscapers disengrate into their own footprint? I'll tell you. After 6 weeks of set up to demolish it. Let me ask you a question. This building fell into it's own footprint at 5 PM on 911. How is this NOT part of it? What kind of a question is that? How isn't it part of it? It's buidling 7 of the WTC complex that was detonated to implode. Why did they detonate it? The headquarters of multiple government agencies were in the building. They had to cover up where 911 was funded and planned?? Also the committe investgating where 2B dollars disappeared from the Pentagon went was there as well. My brother was working at the Pentagon that day and I can assure you what hit the buidling was not a commercial aircraft. Anyone with an open mind and eyes can see that. No people, no landing gear, no seats, no fussilage, one engine that was not a commercial aircraft engine, and there was one HOLE in the buidling, no wing marks, nothing. NO BODIES! Are you serious about 911? Muslims? A passport on the ground from one plane? Are you now going to ask me where the people went now because I said a plane DID NOT hit the pentagoni? I have found that everyone who cannot undrestand that this could happen or has a block beleving this could happen asks the most incredibly mundane questions that really don't make any sense at all, like your question/comment. I'm not trying to be rude but reading what you wrote is mind boggling that you would even think to ask those questions based on what I wrote. A state of the art 47 story skyscaper on 911 disengrated into it's own footprint at 5PM on 911 and instead of focusing on the obvious you are asking this. Maybe you don't understand how long it takes to detonate a 47 story building to fall? So you think in the chaos of 911 on 911 they were able to get a team to load the building to detonate? Buildings like that take multiple weeks to fill with charges.
I would bet my life and the life of EVERYONE I love, 911 was a scam, it couldn't be more obvious. Corona would have never happened if not for 911. They created a rash of Gov't agencies to spy and control us. They justified war in Iraq over this. Lied about WMD's. They didn't tell us the truth about anything. The sooner you realize you are living a lie, the more free you will be. 911 was the beggning of the end.
Exactly. That and a rash of other movies on the subject as well. Anyone who cares to know and has an open mind can learn it was nothing like what they told us. .
I am curious why conspirators would add extraneous pieces to the plot - why complicate things? Why, as you say, do something that is so obviously unnatural? I think it is fair to question narratives and that means questioning all narratives.
I do believe the American government benefitted from 9/11. Evidence also shows agencies of the American government supported the attack - they assisted the attackers and cleared the way for it to happen. To what end were bombings and demolitions staged I have no idea. You and others have strong claims the proof is convincing. I simply don't know.
I don't know why you keep saying that. Are you an agent provocateur or are you sincerely asking these questions?? I ask because you're not making sense. If you believe the US govenment suported the attack and benefitted from 911 why are you asking questions like this? Your question is not a fair question because it's not logical and assumes incorrect information.
Let's focus on one thing. HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE A 47 STORY SKYSCRAPER TO BE FILLED WITH EXPLOSIVES SO IT FALLS DIRECTLY ONTO ITSELF?? IF you're a real person and not a bot or someone trying to throw the rest off the trail, answer that question, stay on point, don't be like the media and confuse things. Answer that question. please. WHY? BECAUSE IF you answer that question truthfully with facts, you won't be making anymore comments because you'd know this was planned WELL in advance. AND THAT IS THE POINT.
RLM already answered this. That building contained evidence that government agencies needed destroyed. It was also owned by parties with convenient (recently acquired) insurance policies that paid huge cash payments.
The purposes served are: enrichment of private parties, money laundering for DOD, destruction of evidence of crimes by other parties.
Thank you for attempting to help me TRY to clarify the obvious to these people. I'm the a-hole because I've known this and had to live with it for 20 plus years while these people have been blissfully ignorant. But I've got to be patient and spoon feed it or I'm mean. And the questions they ask. Always the wrong questions. What's the difference WHY building 7 was detonated. It was+!!! I think it's highly possible they are plants. Have you ever thought about that? They must exist here.
Figure it out on your own, I don't have time to spoon feed you. Plus ive already answered the question. You're likely here to confuse. Probably sitting in a Mossad controlled call center. You're attempting to twist what's logical and obvious while you move from facts that matter to facts that have no bearing. Your comment is useless and doesn't matter. It is what it is. They detonated the building and it was planned long in advance. Those are the facts. Nothing else is material. If you're not a plant your not bright enough to understand, i cant help with that either. Hey Cat , I'd vet this subscriber as a plant.
I'll admit I haven't gone down the 9-11 rabbit hole, just a few quick reality checks, please. No I didn't see the actual events, but I did see news reports that day and on following days. There were eyewitnesses, plenty of them, for both the first and the second plane impacts. There were videos too, especially of the 2nd. None of that is to say no conspriacy, but...
Why would WTC-7 need to be demolished as part of the 9/11 conspiracy? It is understandable that WTC-7 would be demolished as part of the cleanup. What purpose did it serve to plan to take down WTC-7 if WTC-1 and WTC-2 were going to be taken down? Most people have no idea about the WTC-7 story which means WTC-7 is superfluous to the official 9/11 narrative.
Put simply, why would plotters add WTC-7 to the mix of mischief when it seems completely unnecessary to the plot?
I think you're misunderstanding what I'm writing. What do you mean? How often do 47 story skyscapers disengrate into their own footprint? I'll tell you. After 6 weeks of set up to demolish it. Let me ask you a question. This building fell into it's own footprint at 5 PM on 911. How is this NOT part of it? What kind of a question is that? How isn't it part of it? It's buidling 7 of the WTC complex that was detonated to implode. Why did they detonate it? The headquarters of multiple government agencies were in the building. They had to cover up where 911 was funded and planned?? Also the committe investgating where 2B dollars disappeared from the Pentagon went was there as well. My brother was working at the Pentagon that day and I can assure you what hit the buidling was not a commercial aircraft. Anyone with an open mind and eyes can see that. No people, no landing gear, no seats, no fussilage, one engine that was not a commercial aircraft engine, and there was one HOLE in the buidling, no wing marks, nothing. NO BODIES! Are you serious about 911? Muslims? A passport on the ground from one plane? Are you now going to ask me where the people went now because I said a plane DID NOT hit the pentagoni? I have found that everyone who cannot undrestand that this could happen or has a block beleving this could happen asks the most incredibly mundane questions that really don't make any sense at all, like your question/comment. I'm not trying to be rude but reading what you wrote is mind boggling that you would even think to ask those questions based on what I wrote. A state of the art 47 story skyscaper on 911 disengrated into it's own footprint at 5PM on 911 and instead of focusing on the obvious you are asking this. Maybe you don't understand how long it takes to detonate a 47 story building to fall? So you think in the chaos of 911 on 911 they were able to get a team to load the building to detonate? Buildings like that take multiple weeks to fill with charges.
I would bet my life and the life of EVERYONE I love, 911 was a scam, it couldn't be more obvious. Corona would have never happened if not for 911. They created a rash of Gov't agencies to spy and control us. They justified war in Iraq over this. Lied about WMD's. They didn't tell us the truth about anything. The sooner you realize you are living a lie, the more free you will be. 911 was the beggning of the end.
Anyone who is the least bit curious about 9/11 should watch 9/11 New Pearl Harbor.
Exactly. That and a rash of other movies on the subject as well. Anyone who cares to know and has an open mind can learn it was nothing like what they told us. .
Building 7 was key for many!
THE smoking gun with the hand attached,
I am curious why conspirators would add extraneous pieces to the plot - why complicate things? Why, as you say, do something that is so obviously unnatural? I think it is fair to question narratives and that means questioning all narratives.
I do believe the American government benefitted from 9/11. Evidence also shows agencies of the American government supported the attack - they assisted the attackers and cleared the way for it to happen. To what end were bombings and demolitions staged I have no idea. You and others have strong claims the proof is convincing. I simply don't know.
I don't know why you keep saying that. Are you an agent provocateur or are you sincerely asking these questions?? I ask because you're not making sense. If you believe the US govenment suported the attack and benefitted from 911 why are you asking questions like this? Your question is not a fair question because it's not logical and assumes incorrect information.
Let's focus on one thing. HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE A 47 STORY SKYSCRAPER TO BE FILLED WITH EXPLOSIVES SO IT FALLS DIRECTLY ONTO ITSELF?? IF you're a real person and not a bot or someone trying to throw the rest off the trail, answer that question, stay on point, don't be like the media and confuse things. Answer that question. please. WHY? BECAUSE IF you answer that question truthfully with facts, you won't be making anymore comments because you'd know this was planned WELL in advance. AND THAT IS THE POINT.
Why was it part of the plan? What purpose did it serve?
RLM already answered this. That building contained evidence that government agencies needed destroyed. It was also owned by parties with convenient (recently acquired) insurance policies that paid huge cash payments.
The purposes served are: enrichment of private parties, money laundering for DOD, destruction of evidence of crimes by other parties.
Thank you for attempting to help me TRY to clarify the obvious to these people. I'm the a-hole because I've known this and had to live with it for 20 plus years while these people have been blissfully ignorant. But I've got to be patient and spoon feed it or I'm mean. And the questions they ask. Always the wrong questions. What's the difference WHY building 7 was detonated. It was+!!! I think it's highly possible they are plants. Have you ever thought about that? They must exist here.
Figure it out on your own, I don't have time to spoon feed you. Plus ive already answered the question. You're likely here to confuse. Probably sitting in a Mossad controlled call center. You're attempting to twist what's logical and obvious while you move from facts that matter to facts that have no bearing. Your comment is useless and doesn't matter. It is what it is. They detonated the building and it was planned long in advance. Those are the facts. Nothing else is material. If you're not a plant your not bright enough to understand, i cant help with that either. Hey Cat , I'd vet this subscriber as a plant.
Whoa dude! You put your theory out there and should be mature enough to handle questions, and criticisms.
The ad-hominem attacks of genuine questioners makes you look and sons like a nutcase.
I'll admit I haven't gone down the 9-11 rabbit hole, just a few quick reality checks, please. No I didn't see the actual events, but I did see news reports that day and on following days. There were eyewitnesses, plenty of them, for both the first and the second plane impacts. There were videos too, especially of the 2nd. None of that is to say no conspriacy, but...