The only purpose SCOTUS serves is to decide whether or not a law or act is Constitutional.
It's one thing for a non-biologist to not be able to even colloquial define woman (especially seeing as being a woman one of her key qualifications for this sinecure https://youtu.be/0JNO0TBbpSc?si=Mfn6AZc4Y_Hgv7yF)
But it's entirely another thing for a trained legal scholar, one who's been appointed to the highest bench in the land, to not be able to properly understand "Congress shall make no law respecting... abridging the freedom of speech."
Hamstringing the Government is the entire f#@&ing point of 1A.
The only purpose SCOTUS serves is to decide whether or not a law or act is Constitutional.
It's one thing for a non-biologist to not be able to even colloquial define woman (especially seeing as being a woman one of her key qualifications for this sinecure https://youtu.be/0JNO0TBbpSc?si=Mfn6AZc4Y_Hgv7yF)
But it's entirely another thing for a trained legal scholar, one who's been appointed to the highest bench in the land, to not be able to properly understand "Congress shall make no law respecting... abridging the freedom of speech."
Hamstringing the Government is the entire f#@&ing point of 1A.
"the entire f#@&ing point of 1A"
Preach it brother!