Slander? NOT! "Give me a child until he is seven and I will show you the man" - Aristotle... Check out his father's occupation up to the end of WWII... and then you can hate him for everything he is... same goes for his sons
Well stated! Though I do believe that evil is an inherent quality of the soul, it only requires a means of expression... and in that, there is a common denominator between the two. The triumph of Soros is the tragedy of Schwab... money.
There's a difference between those whose brains were miswired at birth, as sociopaths and psychopaths are, and those who make a deliberate choice to turn away from decency.
We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I don't believe one can make a deliberate choice to turn away from decency without an underlying psychosis.
There are, of course, special instances... such as in the heat of battle, just to name one... and in such instances, if one is not under the influence of a psychosis to begin with, one will certainly have to deal with the resulting trauma afterwards.
Mostly, when you look up Tivadar Soros, you get a lot of 'fact' check stories that explain away the accusation of his father's complicity in Nazi confiscation of Jewish wealth. His father did change their name and obtained false papers to hide from the Nazis, true, but some interesting facts shine through...from a Newsweek article on the subject, regarding the Soros biography:
"The book notes that even after the family went into hiding, Tivadar continued to help other members of the Jewish community. Soros recounted that his father "rendered services to about fifty people."
The book says: "Some received documents, others help in finding housing or changing jewelry into foreign currency, although that came later. Some simply sought his advice on survival."
He helped them change jewelry into foreign currency? I wonder what kind of prices he gave them for their family treasures?
It could read that he used his cover identity to help Jewish families with documents, housing and cash. It could also be interpreted that he utilized his alias to hide in plain sight *and* to make a substantial profit off the refugees need to liquidate assets and flee.
Many could see this as a gray area.
Less ambiguous is the absolutely destructive ethos of the Soros foundation, and its subordinate NGOs, which can be seen clearly in the detrimental effect of their activities and lobbying on American society, particularly the judiciary.
Slander? NOT! "Give me a child until he is seven and I will show you the man" - Aristotle... Check out his father's occupation up to the end of WWII... and then you can hate him for everything he is... same goes for his sons
Might be well if you sharpened your research skills.
When I make a mistake, I admit it... I had George Soros confused with Klaus Schwab... two peas in a pod in my opinion, but the error was indeed mine.
They are quite different though. Schwab is both tiresome and laughable, driven by the bureaucrat's soul to slap a regulation on everything.
Soros has burned with the desire for vengeance for all the rest of his post-war life and has chosen to become evil, himself, in that quest.
Well stated! Though I do believe that evil is an inherent quality of the soul, it only requires a means of expression... and in that, there is a common denominator between the two. The triumph of Soros is the tragedy of Schwab... money.
There's a difference between those whose brains were miswired at birth, as sociopaths and psychopaths are, and those who make a deliberate choice to turn away from decency.
We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I don't believe one can make a deliberate choice to turn away from decency without an underlying psychosis.
There are, of course, special instances... such as in the heat of battle, just to name one... and in such instances, if one is not under the influence of a psychosis to begin with, one will certainly have to deal with the resulting trauma afterwards.
Mostly, when you look up Tivadar Soros, you get a lot of 'fact' check stories that explain away the accusation of his father's complicity in Nazi confiscation of Jewish wealth. His father did change their name and obtained false papers to hide from the Nazis, true, but some interesting facts shine through...from a Newsweek article on the subject, regarding the Soros biography:
"The book notes that even after the family went into hiding, Tivadar continued to help other members of the Jewish community. Soros recounted that his father "rendered services to about fifty people."
The book says: "Some received documents, others help in finding housing or changing jewelry into foreign currency, although that came later. Some simply sought his advice on survival."
He helped them change jewelry into foreign currency? I wonder what kind of prices he gave them for their family treasures?
It could read that he used his cover identity to help Jewish families with documents, housing and cash. It could also be interpreted that he utilized his alias to hide in plain sight *and* to make a substantial profit off the refugees need to liquidate assets and flee.
Many could see this as a gray area.
Less ambiguous is the absolutely destructive ethos of the Soros foundation, and its subordinate NGOs, which can be seen clearly in the detrimental effect of their activities and lobbying on American society, particularly the judiciary.