286 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
SCA's avatar

Yes, all of those acts are performative and often quite coercive and not infrequently lead to public hysterias that can be dangerous to non-hysterics.

Expand full comment
Sheryl Rhodes's avatar

First of all, thank you for your on-going willingness to engage in respectful back-and-forth.

Now I am wondering if you object to anti-abortionists praying at a reasonable distance, especially if they are quiet? NB you may find it relevant that, when I was young, I accessed birth control for a time through local Planned Parenthood. I did not like having loud protesters near me at that time; I don't like such things no matter what the cause. But I am also a huge (you could say religious) believer in preserving individual civil rights and liberties such as freedom of speech and assembly. I think that establishing a safety zone around abortion facilities and enforcing noise limits is a reasonable compromise.

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

My essential point is this: If one absolutely believes in the god one is praying to, then that prayer need not be a performative display of your sacred devotion to impeding the liberty of women to decide whether to remain pregnant or not as best suits them.

Laws as we know are very imperfect and no law suits all circumstances. That's why human decency and common sense must also come into play. And of course "human decency" and "common sense" have no universal definition.

All public demonstrations are coercive in nature. That's their point. To encourage or to stop an action or policy that the mob wishes to impede.

Didn't Jesus have something to say about all that? Matthew 6:1-18

Expand full comment