It is reasonable that abortion rights organizations can fund abortions for women who cannot afford them. It is reasonable that charities exempt from taxes may choose to support women who cannot afford the expenses related to raising children they have decided to bear.
As you have noted above, the more the State interests itself in the conduct of individuals, the more coercive its actions become. There are no perfect solutions to the problems of human life.
From your declarations about the community having no business in the lives of the women, it follows that the state should cease the massive payments and grants to the supposed NGOs which are using the funds to accomplish the abortions.
Yes, the state is very interested in being big daddy, and choosing who should not reproduce based upon its shifting agendas.
It is reasonable that abortion rights organizations can fund abortions for women who cannot afford them. It is reasonable that charities exempt from taxes may choose to support women who cannot afford the expenses related to raising children they have decided to bear.
As you have noted above, the more the State interests itself in the conduct of individuals, the more coercive its actions become. There are no perfect solutions to the problems of human life.
From your declarations about the community having no business in the lives of the women, it follows that the state should cease the massive payments and grants to the supposed NGOs which are using the funds to accomplish the abortions.
Yes, the state is very interested in being big daddy, and choosing who should not reproduce based upon its shifting agendas.