Does it really make sense to say that a "closed system," let's say a house, will tend towards disorder, but if you left the door open or took off its roof, the house would spontaneously produce order ("given enough time")? Isn't the house more likely to descend into disorder even FASTER?
Has the process of "spontaneous ordering" ever been observed? Of course that is impossible. So on what basis do these "scientists" posit that it happens? To me it sounds like an article of faith.
There certainly could be entropy in a frog. Any one of the frog's many systems could fail, either before birth or any time after birth. When the frog dies, its body certainly breaks down. So what keeps it alive and functioning in one perfect order? How does that happen ever?
The entire phraseology of the way this law of thermodynamics is currently taught reeks of dishonesty. Sorry, I don't mean to attack you, so please don't take it personally. I'm just sick of this "scientific" spin, of religious atheistic dogma that's passed off as science.
Writing my reply belatedly, but here it is.
Or maybe it IS that simple?
Does it really make sense to say that a "closed system," let's say a house, will tend towards disorder, but if you left the door open or took off its roof, the house would spontaneously produce order ("given enough time")? Isn't the house more likely to descend into disorder even FASTER?
Has the process of "spontaneous ordering" ever been observed? Of course that is impossible. So on what basis do these "scientists" posit that it happens? To me it sounds like an article of faith.
There certainly could be entropy in a frog. Any one of the frog's many systems could fail, either before birth or any time after birth. When the frog dies, its body certainly breaks down. So what keeps it alive and functioning in one perfect order? How does that happen ever?
The entire phraseology of the way this law of thermodynamics is currently taught reeks of dishonesty. Sorry, I don't mean to attack you, so please don't take it personally. I'm just sick of this "scientific" spin, of religious atheistic dogma that's passed off as science.
I like the way you think. I just disagree.
I doubt that we disagree much on anything else we discuss on this board.
That's good enough for me.