Not exactly. Many AIs overlay what is considered the most reliable information over a base of knowledge it gained from "reading" books and scraping the web...
But considering what we've seen from the medical establishment over the last few years, "you got shingles because you used a racial slur in fourth grade" is a foregone conclusion either way. Medical journals are pretty much indistinguishable from retards on Tumblr circa 2014 at this point.
It seems to me there has been a decline in the quality of physicians for a few decades now. I attribute it to a generalized DUMBING DOWN of the population. "The downward spiral of Dumbness in America is about to hit a new low."
There you go. It’s not about accuracy. I still take Cochrane over most one off bullshit studies, even if they write 30 fallacious and holey studies that support nonsense.
Bottom line: Ai can't "think" like humans can. It can't reason the same way, either. This is apparent to me after months working with it for 8-9 hours a day.
Yes! Studies seem to have become very questionable at best. There was a time when Lancet and NEJM were very highly regarded and contained useful information. "Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist."
Not exactly. Many AIs overlay what is considered the most reliable information over a base of knowledge it gained from "reading" books and scraping the web...
But considering what we've seen from the medical establishment over the last few years, "you got shingles because you used a racial slur in fourth grade" is a foregone conclusion either way. Medical journals are pretty much indistinguishable from retards on Tumblr circa 2014 at this point.
AI is programmed with the official narrative/story of just about everything. Go ahead and ask it about chemtrails.
It's horribly biased.
It seems to me there has been a decline in the quality of physicians for a few decades now. I attribute it to a generalized DUMBING DOWN of the population. "The downward spiral of Dumbness in America is about to hit a new low."
Hunter S. Thompson
There you go. It’s not about accuracy. I still take Cochrane over most one off bullshit studies, even if they write 30 fallacious and holey studies that support nonsense.
Bottom line: Ai can't "think" like humans can. It can't reason the same way, either. This is apparent to me after months working with it for 8-9 hours a day.
Yes! Studies seem to have become very questionable at best. There was a time when Lancet and NEJM were very highly regarded and contained useful information. "Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist."
George Carlin
agreed, separating the wheat from the chafe is what the experts are for. AI is like a collection of "news" headlines jammed together.
What an accurate analogy: medical journals / retards on Tubmlr.