There you go. It’s not about accuracy. I still take Cochrane over most one off bullshit studies, even if they write 30 fallacious and holey studies that support nonsense.
Bottom line: Ai can't "think" like humans can. It can't reason the same way, either. This is apparent to me after months working with it for 8-9 hours a day.
Yes! Studies seem to have become very questionable at best. There was a time when Lancet and NEJM were very highly regarded and contained useful information. "Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist."
There you go. It’s not about accuracy. I still take Cochrane over most one off bullshit studies, even if they write 30 fallacious and holey studies that support nonsense.
Bottom line: Ai can't "think" like humans can. It can't reason the same way, either. This is apparent to me after months working with it for 8-9 hours a day.
Yes! Studies seem to have become very questionable at best. There was a time when Lancet and NEJM were very highly regarded and contained useful information. "Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist."
George Carlin
agreed, separating the wheat from the chafe is what the experts are for. AI is like a collection of "news" headlines jammed together.