392 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
SAMO's avatar

Should people lose the right to vote if dependent on government to support them?

I am beginning to think so.

Expand full comment
kertch's avatar

Dependents should not have the right to vote. If you're not responsible enough to provide for yourself, how can you choose a responsible government?

Expand full comment
Maria's avatar

Yep, many philosophers have defended this. If you don't contribute you cannot decide. You could even go further.... if you live from the State (public salaries) you cannot decide on it due to conflict of interests.

Expand full comment
Katie Andraski's avatar

I wonder if a flat tax would solve that so everyone pays for the privilege of living here. Half of Americans don’t pay taxes.

Expand full comment
Pi Guy's avatar

There is some value in having some skin in the game but I think the answer is to stop giving out the money.

Or scale it way back. DOGE might be just the Guy.

Expand full comment
AndyinBC's avatar

If, "stop giving out the money", is the answer - then, "Cui bono?", must be the question.

Expand full comment
Pi Guy's avatar

It sure is.

And I love it when you speak French!

Expand full comment
kertch's avatar

Wait, what's Sonny Bono's sister have to do with it?

Expand full comment
Pi Guy's avatar

Cui. Short for... Cui... I got nuthin'

Expand full comment
kertch's avatar

Another way to spell Cooey?

Expand full comment
SAMO's avatar
Mar 3Edited

Some people and circumstances may want to give a leg up - but that money should be temporary, NOT a lifestyle. And certainly not a lifestyle from generation to generation. Your career or job should not be learning how to game the system for your livelihood. Which is what it's turned into.

Expand full comment
Mitch's avatar

It would definitely help with the perennial problem of democracies voting for their own financial destruction, eventually setting themselves up for dictators.

Expand full comment