120 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Igor Chudov's avatar

Thanks. What makes me suspect foul play is the fact that the unvaxxed case rates change dramatically (retroactively), while the vaxxed case rates stay about same. If they discovered a forgotten trove of records -- very unlikely -- it would increase BOTH vaxxed and unvaxxed rates. I do suspect -- but cannot prove -- foul play because of this.

By the way, I hope that you get better soon.

Expand full comment
Jestre's avatar

I track Alberta data and have noticed a flurry of similar occurrences. I am convinced their two most effective tools are 1) not adjusting summary statistics by person years lived 2) changing denominators on rate equations (ie. Remove one unvaccinated everytime someone gets vaxxed in a given time period, do not adjust the numerator). Alberta does this with time frames as far as 120 days which gives insane (implausible) rates for the unvaxxed and I've even had people quote me it as proof the vax works.

What adjusting for person years lived does:

https://jestre.substack.com/p/against-the-spread

In any case, there are dozens of examples of manipulated data on Alberta's vaxx website. It is either foul play or gross incompetence. I suspect if you look into Santa Clara further this will be the least of the problems you find.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

I am hoping that my writing would prompt someone who is smarter, to look into Santa Clara. I mean, it is as ridiculous as it gets.

Expand full comment
Nate's avatar

Your logic there sounds like the people who were suspicious when big vote dumps ‘discovered’ late into the night last Nov were almost 100% Biden votes… 😀

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

Only ignorant or racist people question midnight vote dumps 100% in favor of Biden

Expand full comment