I would add a group - those that can read data and are intellectually curious. Doctors can read data but don’t bother to anymore. But some PhD’s will because they want to see the test results.
"those that can read data and are intellectually curious."... meaning they love to ask all kinds of questions about everything? That's me for sure. Despite when you're clearly not supposed to, lol.
Yep. I went digging into the data and realized it didn't match with the hysteria. That's when I went for people who were seeing the same things that I was.
There is not enough time to look at source data. And good luck getting honest or definitive clinical data. Fees have been suppressed for at least for my four decades of practice, expenses and "Documentation" demands multiplied continuously. Now that I am "Disemployed" I can spend time with this but I was already described by one of our medical students as "the local cynic" five years ago ( I protested the comment, that I was really a sceptic) and I have useful science training.
Indoctrination starts early, "Vaccines always good", so 96% of your physicians do not need to question the narrative, they are already properly programmed. Most physicians ( probably 90%, I don't have a double-blind randomised study, I am basing this on conversations) do not understand the technology and lies involved with the PCR testing, so are easy marks for the narrative. There are just enough cases in local news, gossip, and practices to keep the story alive, and since "Vaccine Injury" is impossible, it's Covid all the way to the morgue.
Kind of makes you wonder if the notion of an antivaxxer as someone you should look down on was adopted by or created for this moment. Suppose it depends on how much credit you feel the planners deserve and how long you think they've been working on this plan.
I would add a group - those that can read data and are intellectually curious. Doctors can read data but don’t bother to anymore. But some PhD’s will because they want to see the test results.
"those that can read data and are intellectually curious."... meaning they love to ask all kinds of questions about everything? That's me for sure. Despite when you're clearly not supposed to, lol.
Yep. I went digging into the data and realized it didn't match with the hysteria. That's when I went for people who were seeing the same things that I was.
There is not enough time to look at source data. And good luck getting honest or definitive clinical data. Fees have been suppressed for at least for my four decades of practice, expenses and "Documentation" demands multiplied continuously. Now that I am "Disemployed" I can spend time with this but I was already described by one of our medical students as "the local cynic" five years ago ( I protested the comment, that I was really a sceptic) and I have useful science training.
Indoctrination starts early, "Vaccines always good", so 96% of your physicians do not need to question the narrative, they are already properly programmed. Most physicians ( probably 90%, I don't have a double-blind randomised study, I am basing this on conversations) do not understand the technology and lies involved with the PCR testing, so are easy marks for the narrative. There are just enough cases in local news, gossip, and practices to keep the story alive, and since "Vaccine Injury" is impossible, it's Covid all the way to the morgue.
Intellectual curiosity is a rare curse.
Kind of makes you wonder if the notion of an antivaxxer as someone you should look down on was adopted by or created for this moment. Suppose it depends on how much credit you feel the planners deserve and how long you think they've been working on this plan.