That would be interesting. As noted by several justices (including Ginsberg), congress has had more than 50 years to do just that and has not. Someone else made the parallel with immigration: if there was in fact a desire to reform the law it would have at least been brought to the floor. What we've seen for 50 years is distractions, not actions.
I agree. It has been fifty years of very profitable distractions to let the issue languish a la immigration. However, Schumer, Warren, Sanders, and others are now very "angry", and appear to be pushing for a national solution.
That would be interesting. As noted by several justices (including Ginsberg), congress has had more than 50 years to do just that and has not. Someone else made the parallel with immigration: if there was in fact a desire to reform the law it would have at least been brought to the floor. What we've seen for 50 years is distractions, not actions.
I agree. It has been fifty years of very profitable distractions to let the issue languish a la immigration. However, Schumer, Warren, Sanders, and others are now very "angry", and appear to be pushing for a national solution.