I can’t link it but a DW article by John Rigolizzo entitled “Democrats say overturning Roe v Wade won’t help them in the midterms” on May 4th is one I just re-found discussing it.
Personally, I’m not sure. In 2018 I think it would have. However, the left’s treatment of living children from Covid and in public schools, and the growing awareness that it simply returns the subject back to the states, makes me think that might be true. Swing voters, which are parents and middle class workers these days, aren’t dying to codify 3rd trimester abortion in federal law. At the state level, it will motivate pro-life to the same extent as pro-choice.
Yep, I just posted basically this sentiment. Those I talk with online don't see abortion as a priority anymore, Dems gave them much bigger fish to fry the past two years.
The Hill didn’t put it in context, they’ve barely seen an increase in fundraising....
That is good news, but definitely not what the article and included links indicate. Do you have a url you can share?
I can’t link it but a DW article by John Rigolizzo entitled “Democrats say overturning Roe v Wade won’t help them in the midterms” on May 4th is one I just re-found discussing it.
Personally, I’m not sure. In 2018 I think it would have. However, the left’s treatment of living children from Covid and in public schools, and the growing awareness that it simply returns the subject back to the states, makes me think that might be true. Swing voters, which are parents and middle class workers these days, aren’t dying to codify 3rd trimester abortion in federal law. At the state level, it will motivate pro-life to the same extent as pro-choice.
Yep, I just posted basically this sentiment. Those I talk with online don't see abortion as a priority anymore, Dems gave them much bigger fish to fry the past two years.
Thanks for the article referral!