I believe someone elsewhere wrote that Justice Roberts was trying to convince some to rule that, basically, "the Mississippi statute doesn't violate Roe v Wade", so that in theory it would still stand. Though I can't see that actually making a lot of sense legally.
I believe someone elsewhere wrote that Justice Roberts was trying to convince some to rule that, basically, "the Mississippi statute doesn't violate Roe v Wade", so that in theory it would still stand. Though I can't see that actually making a lot of sense legally.