>> "My job ... was to raise productive members of society ... "
Why do people think this is a GOOD thing?
Encouraging offspring to be well-behaved battery-livestock for the tax farm seems like the diametric opposite of the best thing for the offspring.
A better objective might be to raise GOOD PEOPLE, or HAPPY PEOPLE, or HONEST PEOPLE. There's absolutely no evidence that being good, happy or honest results in "productivity" for the tax-farmers - and a reasonable aount of evidence that the opposite is true.
I have no dog in this fight: I loathe children, and have done since I was a child myself. They're stupid and weak and parasitic, and the VAST majority of them grow up to be imbeciles (my definition of 'imbecile' is somewhat nuanced: "less than 2sd above the cognitive median").
I wouldn't have an offspring as a gift, and I'm glad that there will be fewer of them 'going forward' - one of the few small upsides to the recent Pfizer nonsense.
Smart women are on the same page as me: they don't see it as their duty to be brood sows for the Tax Machine; they would rather go skiing.
A very large proportion of breeders can't adequately train a domestic dog - a process that can be successfully completed in two weeks.
And of course let's not forget that the Modern Mother is the most jab-happy numbskull this side of Rochelle Walenskyi, and the most craven follower of "authority figures" (like Fauci), and the entire market for "dream catchers", crystals and "The Secret".
Obviously MY mother is different: the proof is in the jabbing.
None of us 5 were jabbed with anything as infants (except a pin-prick for a blood test). We were all born prior to the "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE" childhood jab schedule, which is now approaching 60 MANDATORY jabs per infant - compliance with which is absolutely shameful.
>> "My job ... was to raise productive members of society ... "
Why do people think this is a GOOD thing?
Encouraging offspring to be well-behaved battery-livestock for the tax farm seems like the diametric opposite of the best thing for the offspring.
A better objective might be to raise GOOD PEOPLE, or HAPPY PEOPLE, or HONEST PEOPLE. There's absolutely no evidence that being good, happy or honest results in "productivity" for the tax-farmers - and a reasonable aount of evidence that the opposite is true.
I have no dog in this fight: I loathe children, and have done since I was a child myself. They're stupid and weak and parasitic, and the VAST majority of them grow up to be imbeciles (my definition of 'imbecile' is somewhat nuanced: "less than 2sd above the cognitive median").
I wouldn't have an offspring as a gift, and I'm glad that there will be fewer of them 'going forward' - one of the few small upsides to the recent Pfizer nonsense.
Smart women are on the same page as me: they don't see it as their duty to be brood sows for the Tax Machine; they would rather go skiing.
A very large proportion of breeders can't adequately train a domestic dog - a process that can be successfully completed in two weeks.
And of course let's not forget that the Modern Mother is the most jab-happy numbskull this side of Rochelle Walenskyi, and the most craven follower of "authority figures" (like Fauci), and the entire market for "dream catchers", crystals and "The Secret".
Obviously MY mother is different: the proof is in the jabbing.
None of us 5 were jabbed with anything as infants (except a pin-prick for a blood test). We were all born prior to the "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE" childhood jab schedule, which is now approaching 60 MANDATORY jabs per infant - compliance with which is absolutely shameful.
Eeeew