218 Comments
User's avatar
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

Psyop masquerading as a morality play. Sums up the entire Democrat party. Anarcho tyranny combined with propaganda. Who gave the stand down order that almost got federal agents killed?

KaiKai's avatar

It is not just happening on the streets of Chicago, Portland and LA it’s happening in the halls of congress. The messaging is spun, edited, coordinated and convenient to the goal. Why? Because they know the majority of people are functioning on an emotional level and don’t drill down into the reality and truth of what they see and read. Some politicians are overt in calling for battle like Newsom and his code red declaration. What intelligent, thinking and measured people need to do is look at the “evidence” presented by anti-Trump and ICE politicians and protestors and see both sides. What we are seeing is Newtons 3rd law of motion equal and opposite reactions devoid of consideration of truth. There is no curiosity to examine both sides. It’s react or die.

As to ICE they need to read this piece and adapt so they don’t fall into a predicted provoked response. They need to turn the script on Saul Alinsky.

kertch's avatar

Exactly. Turn the script on them. The have been trained to provoke a reaction by the authorities which is known, and to a high degree, predictable. ICE can turn the tables by reacting unpredictability. All that ATIFA training then becomes useless. Trump led the way on this politically - it is nearly impossible to box in an unpredictable opponent. Randomize time, location, intent, and intensity. For example, aggressively defend one ICE facility, but abandon a d8fferent one to ANTIFA and let them burn it down. The first is a photo-op for ANTIFA, but the second is a PR ambush. ICE raids could be halted for an indeterminate period of time, then a massive set of raids at 2:00am. In warfare or other confict, predictability means defeat.

Jon Stephenson's avatar

It might be difficult to keep a massive raid under wraps.

kertch's avatar

True, and in that case, you need to randomize location. If there is no way to hide a large operation, you do a D-Day where you are signaling an operation at X, but you end up going to Y.

Bare-Faced Plague-Spreader's avatar

So then create "exercises" meant to look like raids, but actually just provide a presence. Ju jitsu goes both ways

Bronan Co’Brien's avatar

All the more reason to move all these facilities to non-populous areas, like on or near military bases or other isolated areas. Easy to guard, easy to plan.

Pete's avatar

"What intelligent, thinking and measured people need to do is look at the “evidence” presented by anti-Trump and ICE politicians and protestors and see both sides."

The left refuses to do this because their self identities would be destroyed. They will cling to myopic ignorance over empirical evidence every time.

Epaminondas's avatar

The corporate media can spin all they want, but the one great thing about social media is that the power of so-called "journalists" to enforce their preferred narratives has been greatly weakened. You can now see comprehensive footage of these encounters between ICE and these protestors online, not just carefully sanitized and/or selectively edited clips for consumption. You also have Community Notes on sites like X that undermines the ability of politicians and pundits to lie with impunity. Lastly, the Biden years destroyed Democrat credibility on this issue. When asked which party has a better plan for immigration in September 2025, a Reuters/Ipsos survey found that respondents still favored Republicans vs. Democrats by +18%.

Paulette's avatar

It’ll be interesting to see what Bari Weiss does as the new editor-in-chief of CBS News

Epaminondas's avatar

I'm pessimistic. Regardless of the industry, reforming an existing organization is a difficult task. But the fact that corporate media have refused to reform even with years of declining ratings and credibility is a telling indicator that they aren't willing to change even when their own existence is at stake. Unless she can clean house, they are probably doomed.

kertch's avatar

She might move the needle towards the right, but not enough. Right now "moderate Democrat" is not a viable position. Trying to become one will enrage the Far Left, forcing the moderate to choose sides.

CMCM's avatar

I'll be observing from a distance, but to be honest, I don't expect much. She's perhaps just a tool to brainwash the viewers into thinking CBS has changed. I doubt that it has.

Kurt Liebe's avatar

What’s better is to live the experiences, in a weird sort of way. If you’re masochistic. Portland was, is, and will be a shithole no matter what Wyden or Kotek says. People who see it daily on the streets know.

bara.ex.nihilo's avatar

It would be good if the evil websites explaining how it is done was broadcast to the general public for most will never know this information.

Put it out on Fox etc. for everyone to see. Give them the website address so people can look themselves.....would these antifas know? ..... do they watch Fox?

None the less, early birds would spread this around like wildfire.

KaiKai's avatar

NewsNation does.

bara.ex.nihilo's avatar

Thanks. Two things I noticed was the multiple languages available, the push against African nations and confirmaition of my theory:

All this is being done in the name of "Love," hence the need for so much virtue signalling. They are so open about this lie.

Brainwashing

Völva's avatar

Propaganda and brainwashing are used because they work.

First: anyone right of (the new) center is anything from an ignorant hick to an angry racist, in other words subhuman. Subhumans have no rights, even within a democracy. As a matter of fact, its is the duty of Good People (ie left of (the new) center to actively work against them. Subhumans are so stupid they have elected a subhuman monster-president.

Thus: “these are not normal times” (read: normal rules of a peaceful society no longer apply). Go forth and use violence. Violence is peace.

Gym+Fritz's avatar

The democrat extremists are drafting book-2 of “Rules for Radicals”. They are updating the tactics, and raising the stakes. For a certain kind of democrat, it’s all about power and control, no matter how it is achieved. And if it were not for activist judges, the corrupt / partisan media, and the ability of left-wing politicians in blue cities to manipulate police departments, none of this would be happening.

We cannot allow political thugs to roam freely, and then let crooked politicians, and judges, prosecute the thug’s victims - we simply can’t not.

These same crooked prosecutors and judges would incarcerate and bankrupt your grandmother, if she wandered through an open door at the capital.

Right-thinking people need to stop voting for even the good democrats, until the party purges itself.

CMCM's avatar

I would be interested to know if it's possible to pinpoint a time when these activist judges started to be put in office in such large numbers. Was it Obama? Before Obama?

Doug Ross's avatar

When your constituencies are anarchists, Marxists, illegal aliens, Cartel gang-bangers, serial felons, Islamists, racialists and retarded boomer hippies... I think everyone gave the stand down order.

Kay's avatar

All of these activities are illegal at best and rise to treason at worst. I like what they’re doing in El Salvador.

Brett Hyland's avatar

It seems weird that Governor Gavin Gambino would pick the color red for his alarm code when the whole-of-rainbow-government has long been his best color for inciting peaceful rioting.

Mystic William's avatar

Not to bring sex into this discussion but this provoke provoke provoke and then criminalize the reaction is a very female thing to do. And it works well for them most of the time.

ASensibleMan's avatar

Sure would help if Republicans in Congress weren't a pack of supine, spineless weaklings and actually DID SOMETHING about the radical judges.

okboomer's avatar

Republicans obey the rules that tie their hands. Democrats break or change the rules to wield power. It requires something like a 2/3 vote to remove a judge. The solution will have to come from outside the rules or outside of the law.

Bronan Co’Brien's avatar

End the filibuster and simply defund the federal courts. Or pass term limits on them. Or have "three overturns and you're out" rules. Congress can do anything with the federal court system really.

Occam's avatar

....or anything at all.

We like to TALK, but it's time to DO.

Willing Spirit's avatar

Dealing with the radical judges seems like a very key piece of the war.

Yukon Dave's avatar

If you understand what power is. Then you can assume that power would control the opposition as well. Uniparty is a myth. They are all Democratic party by action

Al DuClur's avatar

Of course the Republicans will do something about the radical judges. They will go on FOX News to complain with some complaining about Republicans complaining about the judges. They are paid to not act but, at most, just slow down the Democratic agenda.

CMCM's avatar

Inaction is action.

SCA's avatar

Just as you and so many other Substackers did your own research during Our Plague Era, you guys need to become a legion of following the money that funds all of these chaos-makers because Data Republican can't do it all herself.

As others were asking yesterday on X--why hasn't ActBlue been shut down yet? Well, Bondi has an overflowing plate of Democratic Party shit to deal with as it is; the DoJ can barely fire one out of 100 saboteurs from within gumming up the works until the midterms.

Everyone out here with that magic brain wiring that leads to an obsessive taste for figuring out where the thread ball starts should consider this their new bestest hobby. I ain't got them skills myself but you guys are already my heroes; don't stop now!

Tim R's avatar

This. These terrorists may believe in their cause, but someone's got to pay for their Che Guevara tats, face piercings, and perhaps most importantly, their cell phone bills.

SCA's avatar

Their tents, their black tee-shirts, the rent on their scuzzy apts., the bus fares, the law firms bailing them out...

Trump already showed what shutting down USAID can accomplish.

But every penny of dark money needs to be traced. Soros isn't some fearsome adversary using terrible incomprehensible foul arts. He (I use "he" expansively) transfers funds from one place to another and that leaves a trace. We of the Good must trace it everywhere it goes.

bara.ex.nihilo's avatar

The Treasury Dept might have capacity to do this with authority. This may be why Trump announced that there were beginning to investigate for RICO.

SCA's avatar

I'm sure there's plenty going on behind the scenes.

The Administration is also remarkably tuned in to the X-verse etc. and they follow the breadcrumb and blood trails the citizenry lay out for them, but they're also dealing with so much adversarial actions and inactions from within that they need all those of good will and actual love of our foundational ideals and strengths to provide as much auxiliary assistance as possible.

And it's important to recognize too that there are millions of truly decent people out there whose ideals are correct but who cannot yet recognize who the good guys are. When I read my brother's X feed--and he's a rather infrequent poster on anything other than sports--my heart aches. He's neither a moron nor a person of ill intent but he believes absolutely this Administration is monstrous.

Everyone who can at this moment in time must declare himself "je suis Charlie" and turn out the vote for--and my hand cramps a little in rebellion as I type this--Republican candidates for every race possible. NJ can be won but it will require the sort of evangelism I'm profoundly allergic to but am trying to build up tolerance for.

And VA is even more desperately urgent.

So every bit of factual evidence that we the people can uncover and bring to light is urgently needed to make the unshakeable case against the Democrats.

Tardigrade's avatar

'And it's important to recognize too that there are millions of truly decent people out there whose ideals are correct but who cannot yet recognize who the good guys are.'

This is why I haven't given up on my friends.

SCA's avatar

Yes. Mighty painful though, ain't it, having them consider us the lost who need to be saved?

Ian Schmidt's avatar

Also the infamous safehouse in Portland.

John Henry Holliday, DDS's avatar

Indeed, Antifa is very well-trained and disciplined. I hope that Trump is playing a long game which will result in Antifa's destruction and imprisonment for the chubby girls and noodle-armed boys who fight under its flag, but precious little has been done so far to bring this about.

The Left gets away with these outrages because fellow travelers in the media run cover for them. That leads to some very uncomfortable questions about why this is the case, and who owns the media.

webstersmill's avatar

Ahhh, the media . . . An end run around the media may be in the offing, in the form of prohibiting certain types of advertising by pharma. If one can stand it, just turn on the television and note the incessant hawking of ‘see/ask your doctor’ advertisements, all with the required small type, fast talking warnings (none of which were given in any form for the covid shots). Soooo much money to jerk out of their system.

Tardigrade's avatar

Yes, Pharma controls the airwaves. And they're losing viewership at a substantial rate. I do hope that those ads will be banned – I'm not much in favor of banning anything, but the US and New Zealand are the only countries in the world that allow Pharma advertising on TV. Nevertheless, even without that, their influence is shrinking.

Paulette's avatar

My eyes are on Bari Weiss right now. Let’s see how she does. Left New York Times, founded The Free Press, and now editor in chief of CBS News.

Warmek's avatar

The people who founded Antifa considered everyone who was not a Stalinist Communist to be a fascist.

Fine. Label accepted.

Silva's avatar

Which is kind of funny, given that Stalin himself was a fascist communist. Leon Trotsky noted that Stalin's USSR was "indistinguishable from Germany in the 1930s." For this and other criticisms, of course, Stalin had Trotsky (already in exile in Mexico City) killed.

Communism is supposed to be stateless, where the workers of the world unite to begin a socialist revolution. Stalin's policy was "socialism in one country," which of course is not far off from "National socialism." Indeed, Stalin's USSR was nationalist, like when they named WWII "The great patriotic war."

Stalin's policy of "socialism in one country" remained the doctrine of the USSR, and all of its satellite countries, until the end of the Soviet Union in 1991. All of the trappings of the Soviet Union, from the secret police to the gulags and the use of terror, are features of fascism. Top-down control, command economy, suppression of any art that doesn't glorify the state-sponsored slogans, total censorship of the media, heavy use of propaganda, all of it was just as much a feature of the Soviet Union as it was in 1930s Germany. The methods of control differed slightly, and so did the rhetoric, but the intent and the result was the same.

Fascism is simply what Communism looks like when put into practice. The formula in the Communist Manifesto is completely wrong every step of the way... the workers of the world never united to begin the revolution, so any attempt at imposing Communism manually is already deviating from the Manifesto (aka revisionism). They had to do things the fascist way, because the Communist way never worked at all. Thus, the fascist way became the Communist way, and it remains so today.

jabster's avatar

You do it by arresting who you can, threatening them with the max on a long rap sheet of charges unless they squeal.

It's no different than going after Big Narco or the Mob.

Sarah Thompson's avatar

I do not know if the middle does see it. Maybe in the cities, but once we get to the quiet and still-civilized exurbs, such as where I am, Boomer Karen with Ukraine and Canadian flag completely buys the No Kings narrative and doesn’t think she’s missing any context at all. I don’t see this ending without violence unless something dramatic shifts in the next year, because that’s all we have before the midterms and the GOP deserves to lose. They’ve done NOTHING to officially codify anything that the Trump mandate, from the populace, actually demanded.

And their replacements are straight up Islamist Marxists who are funded by international networks of miscreants.

Silva's avatar

The GOP wants to lose. They love being able to enjoy the perks of being a Washington insider without having to actually do anything. They're part of the uniparty machine, playing their part.

Don't give them what they want. This is Trump's party now, and they can either get with the program or find another line of work.

Sarah Thompson's avatar

Yes, the old guard is terrified to be in power. Not since Gingrich have they done anything assertive. They like being the beta team.

Sarah Thompson's avatar

But, that requires serious primary challengers with serious funding and I don’t know who is going to bankroll that. Elon got pretty smacked down with his efforts to do so earlier in the year.

Gwyneth's avatar

How much federal funding do these cities receive? Turn off that spigot and let them sort themselves out.

bara.ex.nihilo's avatar

They have already stopped funding for some projects.....investigating that all was copesetic when it was released.

Hochul , Newsom and Pritzker howled.

Courageous Lion's avatar

They will just raise unconstitutional property taxes on their residents to pay for the shortage. and the residents should say FU and start an armed resistance.

shasta (non-English speaker)'s avatar

How important is in the US the perception of the US from outside the US? You might think irrelevant, but I don't think it is. Non-US western media is like CNN. Our spanish public TV put George Floyd's funeral live, but Kirk was a fascist.

With this ICE thing the same is probably happening, not sure because i don't watch tv anymore (thanks covid!).

The Scuttlebutt's avatar

"How important is the US perception of the US from outside?" It's only important to the people who are cheering on the ANTIFA crowd. Most of us, especially the "soft middle" couldn't give less of a fuck if they tried. The concern of the average American for "what will Europe think?" is less than 1X10^-9 micro micro giveafucks per cubic mile.

Art's avatar

The essence of the solution is the “move it to Martha’s Vineyard” strategy.

DaveL's avatar

Many Europeans don't like the "Woke-progressive" crap either, believe it or not.

Navyo Ericsen's avatar

As an American-Brit in the UK, it's full-on woke commie propaganda masquerading as the BBC. I guess that's Bring Back Communism. The Trump administration response is inspiring to many of us here. Right now, America leads the way in European politics. The UK-EU are terrified of the People.

fiendish_librarian's avatar

The CBC in Canada makes Pravda look like a shining beacon of journalistic integrity. The good news is that its audience is declining in direct proportion to the fossilized boomers who still consume their programming.

Courageous Lion's avatar

The only reason this "fossilized boomer" would watch is to catch up on what our enemies are pulling.

CorkyAgain's avatar

Only if "what they are pulling" means "what they are doing to keep the deluded rabble on their side". There are plenty of non-woke sites where you can get an update on what's actually happening, without exposing yourself to the mind-numbing effects of their propaganda.

In fact, the best way to monitor their propaganda is to follow writers like our host here, who present it disarmed or sanitized by an accompanying analysis and discussion of its context.

Rikard's avatar

The anti-Trump propaganda serves domestic purposes first and foremost.

Many Euopean governments are on thin ice, and fear popular parties growing so large they will be able to start resisting co-optation by the system, and so the daily scheduled Trump-hate, juxtaposed with the daily hate-sessions for Putin and Jews/Israel is the norm for state and regime-loyal media in Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia.

The regime is deathly afraid of people starting to ask the right questions in public. For Sweden specifically, we are at the same point DDR was, in 1985.

shasta (non-English speaker)'s avatar

Don't you guys have a conservative government at the moment?

Rikard's avatar

Not really, no.

Think Angela Merkel on crack, that's what the right-side of politics look like here.

Occam's avatar

But the point is at this point, it doesn't matter. The issue needs to be addressed (definitively).

The lawlessness cannot stand.

M. Dowrick's avatar

To all CPD….leave Chicago, it is hopeless, go where your efforts and your life is appreciated. Chicago ain’t it.

Ian Schmidt's avatar

A large chunk of CPD quit during the Summer of Love in 2020 and were replaced by DEI hires who likely are on board with this.

Chicago527's avatar

I suggest reading Second City Cop blog for the real picture https://secondcitycop.blogspot.com

Julie's avatar

Thank you for this link!

Liz LaSorte's avatar

One discussion we need to have is how many illegal and legal immigrants are using welfare, and especially for their newborn children born here for what appears to be cradle-to-grave dependency on the government. Welfare is not only “un-American” in principle, but it is unsustainable as a culture.

The other discussion is how many “angel” families have been harmed because of illegal immigration. According to Grok, the numbers for just the people who were murdered is about 63,000 and that doesn’t cover all the uninsured motorist accidents or physical injuries caused by illegal immigrants in auto accidents alone.

The question we should be asking is why is anyone against legal immigration? If a person is legally here, it’s hard to understand why they would be afraid. Just ask the legal immigrants how they feel about illegal immigration:

https://lizlasorte.substack.com/p/borders-and-boundaries-and-freedom?r=76q58

KHP's avatar

> The question we should be asking is why is anyone against legal immigration?

Rather, we should be asking why we even need legal immigration?

The last time the US had a large number of immigrants, the preference was for people from western Europe, Scandinavia, and above all the Anglosphere -- In other words, those who were culturally most like the folks who were already here. At the same time, we had a very strong assimilationist ethic.

None of that is true now; if we hope to regain a sense of nationality we need a half century or more of moratorium plus a restoration of that assimilationist ethic. The alternative is to continue to fragment.

Liz LaSorte's avatar

Agreed and it started to change after the Immigtation Act of 1965 - we need to revist why we allowed that to happen.

But now America is well below the replication rate -supposedly 2.1 births - but wasn't that number decided before AI started getting rid of jobs?

Rikard's avatar

If you had retained the same sorting-categories and bars as you had back then, the USA would have maybe 230 000 000 citizens today.

I'm not disapproving of the measures used historically; I really wish us over here had never dropped our old ones either.

KHP's avatar

Indeed, growing from 100 million to 230 million in the same timespan in which we reached 330 million would have been perfectly fine.

Art's avatar

If the costs were itemized as a separate line item on everybody’s tax bill that might alter perceptions.

Lucia P's avatar

Also, have auto insurers line item premium increases due to accidents caused by illegals. Our agent admitted as much.

Free Range Texan's avatar

I voted for this. Leftist politicians who defend the lawless need to be arrested for seditious conduct. Judges who overstep - including the Trump appointee who overruled the guard deployment - need to be exposed to the street violence occurring, directly for 24 hours, then impeached and ignored. Who radicalized me? The left. I want my country back.

Heyjude's avatar

That “photo” of an adorable child being handcuffed? Only people who don’t have kids could believe it is real. Parents know that no child under 2 stands there looking angelic with his hands behind his back amid this chaos.

Juju's avatar

That video was actually a father playing cops and robbers with their toddler while the mother filmed it. But the left decided to use it, lie about it, change it to “ziptied”, and deceive the lazy that won’t do their own research.

https://x.com/rebelgirl1601/status/1975307893005316126

CorkyAgain's avatar

Yeah, a real toddler would be screaming and squirming like a cat being threatened with a flea bath.

The Scuttlebutt's avatar

They have already overplayed their hand in most of America outside the big cities. It's more "you know, if he/she/it dies during the arrest we don't have to pay for a trial" and less, "oh those poor people being jacked up by those evil thugs."

Who radicalized the middle? That would be the guys doing the rioting.

Ian Schmidt's avatar

This is also the origin of the oft-mocked "Republicans pounce!" playbook beloved of the media.

Roberto's avatar

Theatre Kids are experts at framing fictions, though. Gotta smash those frames to see the real picture.

Madjack's avatar

The will to power. We know what must be done. We must do it without remorse or apology. Crush them.

JBK's avatar

I am afraid that is what needs to be done and it is "getting there"....but that means real ammo and possibly the REAL military....unfortunately too many here believe they are "snatching citizens" and deporting them, they are not...detaining them but not deporting them. Though from the videos I am seeing they definitely should deport them....have you seen some of these videos and the WOMEN spouting lovely language at National Guard, Border Patrol agents, ICE themselves? Not the United States I have known and lived in....I say show them what real power is and let them decide if this is the "hill" they wish to die on.

Occam's avatar

If there were real consequences for their behaviour, they'd stop.

Nobody wants to go to prison - it's not like these people are going to inspire change with their pink-haired, masked selves sitting in max security.

Occam's avatar

100%

Stop talking. Stop worrying. Do not engage. No more tweets or speeches.

We have the moral authority, the voter mandate.

DO IT.

ScottyG's avatar

Can we just round up all these illegals and create tents for living outside every democrat’s dwelling?