Your correction of #2 is itself wrong. The "study" that demonstrated this was so bad it's used in the teaching of statistics as an example of what not to do.
I believe there have been so many holes poked in that study that virtually no conclusion has much validity. Thank you for bring this up; I wasn’t sure where to address it.
Your correction of #2 is itself wrong. The "study" that demonstrated this was so bad it's used in the teaching of statistics as an example of what not to do.
I believe there have been so many holes poked in that study that virtually no conclusion has much validity. Thank you for bring this up; I wasn’t sure where to address it.