The only difference between the Tories and Labour is that Labour will implement the UN Agenda objectives faster (they are the same as the WEF agenda but the WEF is there as a distraction to keep you from understanding that the UN is in charge).
We are doomed, unless people wake up and over throw this rotten system.
A year and a half ago I was advocating for a permanent "Occupy Westminster". It only takes a very small percentage of the population to overthrow a government and a system in general. Getting 1.5-3% of the population to occupy Westminster and not leave until the bastards have gone is achievable and I stand by what I said.
You're right that Labour and the Tories (and the Lib Dems) are all offering to take us to the same destination, merely at different speeds of travel. This is the result of decades of centralisation of power, removing meaningful democratic control from the hands of citizens and funnelling it upwards to bureaucrats to insulate the 'direction of travel' from public feedback/intervention.
It's a major issue all across the west. And voters do see that no matter how they vote they will be served the Davos agenda. The power structures have grown to be massive, opaque, even oppressive. Most of all they are unresponsive. So voters become depressed and demoralised; why vote, when it makes no difference? ...when no meaningful change will take place based on the vote?
The UK now has three left wing parties of various degrees, and no centre right or right parties, despite the voters still being largely small 'c' conservative in outlook. The coalescence of all main parties around the soft-left, green, woke, globalist position is causing a huge distortion in the ability for our democracy to function.
Voting should keep a lid on public anger by offering a release valve, but when all parties are effectively the same party once they get into office, then the steam builds up in the pot, and that's what's happening now.
Governments should never be allowed to get too large (in sprawl, or in our lives) ...or they will use that power to begin existing for their own sake. Selling their own self-serving lies. I think that's what we have now? — a system that lives for itself, primarily. The 'state' is now so big it touches everything. It's so bloated that it reaches into the most intimate corners of citizens' lives. The state is everywhere. It's in classrooms, bedrooms, parent/child relationships, etc.
Having achieved this immense and inappropriate power, now it's been targeted and colonised by the kind of people who are exactly the sort that should not be anywhere near power.
The answer (as I see it) isn't to elect my particular 'team', who I personally agree with... but on the contrary, it's to de-fang and de-centralise the system in such a way that the state has less power and influence in our lives. And hence less corruption is invited to be centralised; attracted to one central location - the limitless font of money and power that is the 'big state'.
The only difference between the Tories and Labour is that Labour will implement the UN Agenda objectives faster (they are the same as the WEF agenda but the WEF is there as a distraction to keep you from understanding that the UN is in charge).
Look at this BS:
https://www.conservatives.com/
"Making Britain better for everyone"?
Nope, Build Back Better.
We are doomed, unless people wake up and over throw this rotten system.
A year and a half ago I was advocating for a permanent "Occupy Westminster". It only takes a very small percentage of the population to overthrow a government and a system in general. Getting 1.5-3% of the population to occupy Westminster and not leave until the bastards have gone is achievable and I stand by what I said.
You're right that Labour and the Tories (and the Lib Dems) are all offering to take us to the same destination, merely at different speeds of travel. This is the result of decades of centralisation of power, removing meaningful democratic control from the hands of citizens and funnelling it upwards to bureaucrats to insulate the 'direction of travel' from public feedback/intervention.
It's a major issue all across the west. And voters do see that no matter how they vote they will be served the Davos agenda. The power structures have grown to be massive, opaque, even oppressive. Most of all they are unresponsive. So voters become depressed and demoralised; why vote, when it makes no difference? ...when no meaningful change will take place based on the vote?
The UK now has three left wing parties of various degrees, and no centre right or right parties, despite the voters still being largely small 'c' conservative in outlook. The coalescence of all main parties around the soft-left, green, woke, globalist position is causing a huge distortion in the ability for our democracy to function.
Voting should keep a lid on public anger by offering a release valve, but when all parties are effectively the same party once they get into office, then the steam builds up in the pot, and that's what's happening now.
Governments should never be allowed to get too large (in sprawl, or in our lives) ...or they will use that power to begin existing for their own sake. Selling their own self-serving lies. I think that's what we have now? — a system that lives for itself, primarily. The 'state' is now so big it touches everything. It's so bloated that it reaches into the most intimate corners of citizens' lives. The state is everywhere. It's in classrooms, bedrooms, parent/child relationships, etc.
Having achieved this immense and inappropriate power, now it's been targeted and colonised by the kind of people who are exactly the sort that should not be anywhere near power.
The answer (as I see it) isn't to elect my particular 'team', who I personally agree with... but on the contrary, it's to de-fang and de-centralise the system in such a way that the state has less power and influence in our lives. And hence less corruption is invited to be centralised; attracted to one central location - the limitless font of money and power that is the 'big state'.