Dawnfrench: have you ever done this? (reported $0 as your "wages" on form 1040) Did you actually receive a refund? I looked up your references (thank you for linking), and they check out. I'm skeptical this actually works.
You’ll wind up with the IRS taking everything you have if you have significant tax liability if you listen to her. Ask a tax attorney what happens in court and what a “frivolous” tax case is. I don’t have time to address this fully right now because I’m busy, but I will after October 15th.
Here, the "licensed CPA" is resorting to threats in an effort to continue the fraud. He's all in because his income is almost entirely derived from the fraud. This is the problem we face as Americans, there are MANY OTHER AMERICANS WHO ARE PROFITING FROM THE FRAUD AGAINST YOU.
Also, notice he has no comment regarding what the LAW ACTUALLY SAYS. Specifically regarding the definition of "frivolous." Once you read and understand that definition and what constitutes frivolous, you will see this is just another tactic to keep you fearful and complicit in the fraud against you.
Also, to add, I told you that I’m busy right now, but just you wait. I will address each of your points after the tax deadline - it will be fairly easy- the IRS has a giant webpage devoted to this stupidity that lists all the court cases and legal statutes. All in one place. We will have so much fun with that.
On the bright side, maybe for anyone naive enough to follow your advice, the tax court is pretty lenient with first time frivolous claims. They usually just give a warning. Unlike for these poor dummies, five years in federal prison tsk tsk:
You are completely ignoring the extensive list of court cases that I posted above showing that you are full of it.
I also do assurance work, which actually has higher profit margins than tax. I just enjoy tax because I am very good at keeping my clients out of trouble and maximizing the amount of income they retain. You are advocating something that has been completely discredited by the courts, which multiple people have gone to jail for (see the above link), and you seem to think it’s cute or something.
Again, those court cases apply to TAXPAYERS. And if you are not, by the definition in the code, a "taxpayer" then all the statutes and court cases do not apply to you. Only if you insist, against the literal definition in the code, on labeling yourself as a "taxpayer" does any of this apply.
Remember folks, Mr. "licensed CPA" has never once addressed the elephant in the room: the income tax is an INDIRECT TAX. "Income" is and only is the result of the exercise of privilege. He has no answer for this. He cannot account for it because he is conveniently not seeing it because his paycheck depends on him not seeing it. Just like everyone paid to push "safe and effective."
Why would they take everything you have? wouldn’t they just not pay in the first place? Or if they did pay, demand the money back with a penalty or something?
I mean that the IRS can take anything and everything you have to satisfy your tax liability. They will garnish your wages, empty your bank accounts, and foreclose on your property, IF you refuse to pay.
If you want proof- this link at the IRS website has an entire list of frivolous arguments and the court cases that go with them. They have put people in jail for promoting and profiting off such schemes, I promise you, if you owe money, the IRS can and will take whatever they are owed and if they want to make an example of you, they will put you in prison - https://www.irs.gov/privacy-disclosure/the-truth-about-frivolous-tax-arguments-introduction
I read through that, we’ll see what dawnfrench responds with. My BS meter is high, but I’m investigating because I’ve long believed the government cannot legally tax me, i just lack the power to fight back.
You might want to look up the judge’s opinion in TC Memo 2014-35. It’s a very interesting read. The case is Steven T. Waltner v. Commissioner. The judge goes through each point in that book in his legal opinion. The bottom line is this: making up your own definition of words contrary to their common law (and common sense) definitions doesn’t a case make.
Btw, you can apparently be fined up to $25,000 for taking one of the positions that is in the book. That’s a little more than $5,000. Caveat emptor.
Yeah I’m definitely not ready to try it yet. But i am going to keep researching and watching what happens to people who try it. Bottom line for me is, even if the book is correct, the government can still throw me in jail (since when has the law prevented that?) and keep my money (ditto), and I’m not ready for that kind of commitment. I have three toddlers and a wife to take care of :) but if i see examples of people applying this and it working out, i may be persuadable. I hate the federal government and believe they act fraudulently on a daily basis, so any moral act i can contribute that fights back against them, I’m all for. But i have to balance the risks and benefits…
You just need curiosity and diligence. And courage. They know they are committing fraud and they don't like losing their tax slaves, but we have and have always had the power to remove our own chains. And those chains are around our minds.
Irwin Schiff is controlled opposition. He didn't spend a single day behind bars. The whole things was an OP to scare you (remember the purpose of FEAR).
Don't you think it's interesting that Peter (Irwin's son) began his career as a stockbroker at a Shearson Lehman Brothers brokerage in the early 1990s and while they CLAIM they are of no relation they just happen to share the same last name as FOUR PARTNERS at Kuhn Loeb & Co (later merged with Lehman Brothers, later became Shearson Lehman Brothers). Oh, and the original MANAGING PARTNER at Kuhn Loeb & Co, Jacob Schiff, was not only the brother-in-law of Solomon Loeb but the brother-in-law of Paul Warburg, the architect of the Federal Reserve Act
If you still don't believe the Schiff selling you the "don't fight the IRS" scam isn't related to the Schiffs who architected your slavery to the banksters, take a look at the picture of Mortimer vs. Peter on page 7 of this document: http://mileswmathis.com/rich.pdf
THIS IS A VERY PROFITABLE SCAM FOR THEM AND THEY WILL LIE, CHEAT AND STEAL TO MAINTAIN THEIR GRAVY TRAIN. And they've built an entire ecosystem of bureaucrats and "licensed professionals" to administer the scam and keep the peasants uninformed and afraid so they don't have to do anything but collect.
Mr. Research here isn't paying attention to the slippery language being used to accuse a filer of submitting a "frivolous" return. However, as is very clear from a reading of the code Section 6702, following the law is NOT FRIVOLOUS by definition.
And again, notice he is resorting to scare tactics and threats versus an educated understanding about what is SUBJECT to the tax and what isn't, and what the tax law says and what it doesn't.
That's how you and he has been propagandized. Just like "safe and effective" they think if they repeat the lie often enough, you'll believe it. (And they're right.)
The FEAR of an IRS audit is used to shut down your critical thinking skills and make you easier to control. That's their job. And Mr. Researcher here is PROFITING from your fear and ignorance.
The thing is, I was one of those who was expected to promote "safe and effective" but fortunately I work in a dermatology office, not an office offering vaccinations. I spoke openly with patients about my concerns and that I chose not to be vaccinated, but I do know about them trying to instill fear, my office manager threatened to write me up but I'm the sole source of revenue for our independent practice (along with two other providers) so I knew I was too valuable to fire. The whole COVID vaccine ordeal was so eye-opening to me, I'm surprised I'm even entertaining the idea that you are presenting. However, I could afford a $5000 bet to call the government's bluff, so I'll look more into it.
Interest rates on IRS late payments are currently 7%. If you’re going to do something with $5,000 that risks jail time, I would personally recommend something more amusing than federal court.
Dawnfrench: have you ever done this? (reported $0 as your "wages" on form 1040) Did you actually receive a refund? I looked up your references (thank you for linking), and they check out. I'm skeptical this actually works.
You’ll wind up with the IRS taking everything you have if you have significant tax liability if you listen to her. Ask a tax attorney what happens in court and what a “frivolous” tax case is. I don’t have time to address this fully right now because I’m busy, but I will after October 15th.
Here, the "licensed CPA" is resorting to threats in an effort to continue the fraud. He's all in because his income is almost entirely derived from the fraud. This is the problem we face as Americans, there are MANY OTHER AMERICANS WHO ARE PROFITING FROM THE FRAUD AGAINST YOU.
Also, notice he has no comment regarding what the LAW ACTUALLY SAYS. Specifically regarding the definition of "frivolous." Once you read and understand that definition and what constitutes frivolous, you will see this is just another tactic to keep you fearful and complicit in the fraud against you.
Also, to add, I told you that I’m busy right now, but just you wait. I will address each of your points after the tax deadline - it will be fairly easy- the IRS has a giant webpage devoted to this stupidity that lists all the court cases and legal statutes. All in one place. We will have so much fun with that.
On the bright side, maybe for anyone naive enough to follow your advice, the tax court is pretty lenient with first time frivolous claims. They usually just give a warning. Unlike for these poor dummies, five years in federal prison tsk tsk:
https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2006/February/06_tax_098.html
You are completely ignoring the extensive list of court cases that I posted above showing that you are full of it.
I also do assurance work, which actually has higher profit margins than tax. I just enjoy tax because I am very good at keeping my clients out of trouble and maximizing the amount of income they retain. You are advocating something that has been completely discredited by the courts, which multiple people have gone to jail for (see the above link), and you seem to think it’s cute or something.
Again, those court cases apply to TAXPAYERS. And if you are not, by the definition in the code, a "taxpayer" then all the statutes and court cases do not apply to you. Only if you insist, against the literal definition in the code, on labeling yourself as a "taxpayer" does any of this apply.
Remember folks, Mr. "licensed CPA" has never once addressed the elephant in the room: the income tax is an INDIRECT TAX. "Income" is and only is the result of the exercise of privilege. He has no answer for this. He cannot account for it because he is conveniently not seeing it because his paycheck depends on him not seeing it. Just like everyone paid to push "safe and effective."
Why would they take everything you have? wouldn’t they just not pay in the first place? Or if they did pay, demand the money back with a penalty or something?
I mean that the IRS can take anything and everything you have to satisfy your tax liability. They will garnish your wages, empty your bank accounts, and foreclose on your property, IF you refuse to pay.
If you want proof- this link at the IRS website has an entire list of frivolous arguments and the court cases that go with them. They have put people in jail for promoting and profiting off such schemes, I promise you, if you owe money, the IRS can and will take whatever they are owed and if they want to make an example of you, they will put you in prison - https://www.irs.gov/privacy-disclosure/the-truth-about-frivolous-tax-arguments-introduction
I read through that, we’ll see what dawnfrench responds with. My BS meter is high, but I’m investigating because I’ve long believed the government cannot legally tax me, i just lack the power to fight back.
You might want to look up the judge’s opinion in TC Memo 2014-35. It’s a very interesting read. The case is Steven T. Waltner v. Commissioner. The judge goes through each point in that book in his legal opinion. The bottom line is this: making up your own definition of words contrary to their common law (and common sense) definitions doesn’t a case make.
Btw, you can apparently be fined up to $25,000 for taking one of the positions that is in the book. That’s a little more than $5,000. Caveat emptor.
Yeah I’m definitely not ready to try it yet. But i am going to keep researching and watching what happens to people who try it. Bottom line for me is, even if the book is correct, the government can still throw me in jail (since when has the law prevented that?) and keep my money (ditto), and I’m not ready for that kind of commitment. I have three toddlers and a wife to take care of :) but if i see examples of people applying this and it working out, i may be persuadable. I hate the federal government and believe they act fraudulently on a daily basis, so any moral act i can contribute that fights back against them, I’m all for. But i have to balance the risks and benefits…
You just need curiosity and diligence. And courage. They know they are committing fraud and they don't like losing their tax slaves, but we have and have always had the power to remove our own chains. And those chains are around our minds.
I’d be careful what I promote if I were her - https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2006/February/06_tax_098.html
https://losthorizons.com/FRP/IRSFRPFraud.htm
Irwin Schiff is controlled opposition. He didn't spend a single day behind bars. The whole things was an OP to scare you (remember the purpose of FEAR).
Don't you think it's interesting that Peter (Irwin's son) began his career as a stockbroker at a Shearson Lehman Brothers brokerage in the early 1990s and while they CLAIM they are of no relation they just happen to share the same last name as FOUR PARTNERS at Kuhn Loeb & Co (later merged with Lehman Brothers, later became Shearson Lehman Brothers). Oh, and the original MANAGING PARTNER at Kuhn Loeb & Co, Jacob Schiff, was not only the brother-in-law of Solomon Loeb but the brother-in-law of Paul Warburg, the architect of the Federal Reserve Act
If you still don't believe the Schiff selling you the "don't fight the IRS" scam isn't related to the Schiffs who architected your slavery to the banksters, take a look at the picture of Mortimer vs. Peter on page 7 of this document: http://mileswmathis.com/rich.pdf
THIS IS A VERY PROFITABLE SCAM FOR THEM AND THEY WILL LIE, CHEAT AND STEAL TO MAINTAIN THEIR GRAVY TRAIN. And they've built an entire ecosystem of bureaucrats and "licensed professionals" to administer the scam and keep the peasants uninformed and afraid so they don't have to do anything but collect.
Mr. Research here isn't paying attention to the slippery language being used to accuse a filer of submitting a "frivolous" return. However, as is very clear from a reading of the code Section 6702, following the law is NOT FRIVOLOUS by definition.
And again, notice he is resorting to scare tactics and threats versus an educated understanding about what is SUBJECT to the tax and what isn't, and what the tax law says and what it doesn't.
That's how you and he has been propagandized. Just like "safe and effective" they think if they repeat the lie often enough, you'll believe it. (And they're right.)
The FEAR of an IRS audit is used to shut down your critical thinking skills and make you easier to control. That's their job. And Mr. Researcher here is PROFITING from your fear and ignorance.
The thing is, I was one of those who was expected to promote "safe and effective" but fortunately I work in a dermatology office, not an office offering vaccinations. I spoke openly with patients about my concerns and that I chose not to be vaccinated, but I do know about them trying to instill fear, my office manager threatened to write me up but I'm the sole source of revenue for our independent practice (along with two other providers) so I knew I was too valuable to fire. The whole COVID vaccine ordeal was so eye-opening to me, I'm surprised I'm even entertaining the idea that you are presenting. However, I could afford a $5000 bet to call the government's bluff, so I'll look more into it.
Interest rates on IRS late payments are currently 7%. If you’re going to do something with $5,000 that risks jail time, I would personally recommend something more amusing than federal court.
The only thing I am advocating here is for you to become educated about the law.