Here, the "licensed CPA" is resorting to threats in an effort to continue the fraud. He's all in because his income is almost entirely derived from the fraud. This is the problem we face as Americans, there are MANY OTHER AMERICANS WHO ARE PROFITING FROM THE FRAUD AGAINST YOU.
Also, notice he has no comment regarding what the LAW ACTUALLY SAYS. Specifically regarding the definition of "frivolous." Once you read and understand that definition and what constitutes frivolous, you will see this is just another tactic to keep you fearful and complicit in the fraud against you.
Also, to add, I told you that I’m busy right now, but just you wait. I will address each of your points after the tax deadline - it will be fairly easy- the IRS has a giant webpage devoted to this stupidity that lists all the court cases and legal statutes. All in one place. We will have so much fun with that.
On the bright side, maybe for anyone naive enough to follow your advice, the tax court is pretty lenient with first time frivolous claims. They usually just give a warning. Unlike for these poor dummies, five years in federal prison tsk tsk:
You are completely ignoring the extensive list of court cases that I posted above showing that you are full of it.
I also do assurance work, which actually has higher profit margins than tax. I just enjoy tax because I am very good at keeping my clients out of trouble and maximizing the amount of income they retain. You are advocating something that has been completely discredited by the courts, which multiple people have gone to jail for (see the above link), and you seem to think it’s cute or something.
Again, those court cases apply to TAXPAYERS. And if you are not, by the definition in the code, a "taxpayer" then all the statutes and court cases do not apply to you. Only if you insist, against the literal definition in the code, on labeling yourself as a "taxpayer" does any of this apply.
Remember folks, Mr. "licensed CPA" has never once addressed the elephant in the room: the income tax is an INDIRECT TAX. "Income" is and only is the result of the exercise of privilege. He has no answer for this. He cannot account for it because he is conveniently not seeing it because his paycheck depends on him not seeing it. Just like everyone paid to push "safe and effective."
Here, the "licensed CPA" is resorting to threats in an effort to continue the fraud. He's all in because his income is almost entirely derived from the fraud. This is the problem we face as Americans, there are MANY OTHER AMERICANS WHO ARE PROFITING FROM THE FRAUD AGAINST YOU.
Also, notice he has no comment regarding what the LAW ACTUALLY SAYS. Specifically regarding the definition of "frivolous." Once you read and understand that definition and what constitutes frivolous, you will see this is just another tactic to keep you fearful and complicit in the fraud against you.
Also, to add, I told you that I’m busy right now, but just you wait. I will address each of your points after the tax deadline - it will be fairly easy- the IRS has a giant webpage devoted to this stupidity that lists all the court cases and legal statutes. All in one place. We will have so much fun with that.
On the bright side, maybe for anyone naive enough to follow your advice, the tax court is pretty lenient with first time frivolous claims. They usually just give a warning. Unlike for these poor dummies, five years in federal prison tsk tsk:
https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2006/February/06_tax_098.html
You are completely ignoring the extensive list of court cases that I posted above showing that you are full of it.
I also do assurance work, which actually has higher profit margins than tax. I just enjoy tax because I am very good at keeping my clients out of trouble and maximizing the amount of income they retain. You are advocating something that has been completely discredited by the courts, which multiple people have gone to jail for (see the above link), and you seem to think it’s cute or something.
Again, those court cases apply to TAXPAYERS. And if you are not, by the definition in the code, a "taxpayer" then all the statutes and court cases do not apply to you. Only if you insist, against the literal definition in the code, on labeling yourself as a "taxpayer" does any of this apply.
Remember folks, Mr. "licensed CPA" has never once addressed the elephant in the room: the income tax is an INDIRECT TAX. "Income" is and only is the result of the exercise of privilege. He has no answer for this. He cannot account for it because he is conveniently not seeing it because his paycheck depends on him not seeing it. Just like everyone paid to push "safe and effective."