So what is your definition of "effectively unlimited immigration"and how do you see its effect on US sovereignty? The below position by Dave Smith sounds reasonable and consistent with the values.
I am not for "effectively unlimited immigration" and the libertarian policy regarding it shouldn't be for it either...as you should not be able to come where you aren't invited. The idea that people should wander into your house, take what they want, is a ridiculous notion and definitely is not considered "peaceful" in the way they arrived.
If I was polite, invited myself into your house, and then raised your refrigerator and stole all your possessions, that wouldn't be very peaceful.
How many ad hominem attacks are we up to now? I hear with fifty, you can get a rain slicker.
1. Ignorant
2. Uneducated
3.Leftist
4. Inexperienced
5.Unintelligible
6. Extreme Arguments.
7. Double Speaker
8. Lazy
9. Loser
10. Spoiler
11. Incompetent
12. Diversive
13. Game-Player
14. Speed Bump
Mises principles at least are relevant factors for because they speak to the factors that libertarian ideas were predicated upon.
Speaking of Weld, in my effort to educate myself, I ran across this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Yj851NgjUA
So what is your definition of "effectively unlimited immigration"and how do you see its effect on US sovereignty? The below position by Dave Smith sounds reasonable and consistent with the values.
I am not for "effectively unlimited immigration" and the libertarian policy regarding it shouldn't be for it either...as you should not be able to come where you aren't invited. The idea that people should wander into your house, take what they want, is a ridiculous notion and definitely is not considered "peaceful" in the way they arrived.
If I was polite, invited myself into your house, and then raised your refrigerator and stole all your possessions, that wouldn't be very peaceful.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GWM8Ne20WY
But why listen to me or these examples, you believe my only use is as a speed bump.