silence is not science
This past decade I have regretted not becoming a tv weather forecaster: cute dresses, perky hair style, an actual reason to stay super buff for the viewers..... etc.
The main advantage is that you can be wrong 90%+ of the time and the followers still admire you.
What an ego party
Regarding censorship: it is purely to disarm the people before the real battle begins. They mean to enslave you, and these are not a bunch of boy-scouts we're dealing with - they intend to get what they want, by hook or by crook. They need you to be quiet for the same reason a kidnapper muzzles his victims with duck tape. You're not allowed to sound the alarm.
Regarding the media and politics: Remember when everyone knew that pro-wrestling was fake and they finally admitted it and the fans didn't care and continued to watch it anyway? We're almost there —meme
Regarding climate change: 97% of scientists agree that they do not want their funding cut —meme
Perhaps we should coin the term "climate stability deniers", and start hurling it around with as much vitriol as we can manage.
Check out this global cooling scare “documentary” from the 70s narrated by Leonard Nimoy https://youtu.be/0-ZDnSbNIYs?si=0INd_8DUJMc7X5pH
Popular celebrities are always used to promote the agenda.
Covid, climate change.
“those elevated to power were not the best and brightest, mostly they were dangerously unqualified dullards chosen for political purpose, ideological purity, and a proven willingness to lie about anything and everything in service of “the cause.” (very soviet, no?)”
If there was an actual climate crisis you would see it by now after decades of ginned up fake studies and proclamations. There is no science to support the existence of a crisis. Trees use CO2 to make oxygen. The end. Not a problem, but a benefit. CO2 is a trace element in the atmosphere. We breathe it out every time we exhale. Our bodies make it all day long. Does it make sense that it’s poison?
Drive down the road, any road. Are all the trees and shrubs dead from exhaust fumes? No. They have to trim the trees and the shrubs or they overgrow the road.
Climate involves massive variables like the sun and underwater volcanoes and forces of magnitudes far greater than human activity. We are insignificant. The climate fanatics needed a new religion since they gave up on the old ones.
The grifters at the top just lust after money and power. If you aren’t a sociopath, you can’t think like a sociopath. But that’s what you’re dealing with. Nothing is ever enough. It’s a sickness.
We are on the same wavelength, gato. Climate censorship fascism is similar to apocalypto. When will the human sacrifices begin to please the weather gods? https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/climate-change-esg-un-wef-apocalypto
So, I turned to my feline companion with this query: "Ever heard of this word 'haruspicy'?
He twitched his tail and muttered, "You've got SOME guts..."
"determined data adulteration"
Hardly anybody does good Consonance these days.
I’ve always based my beliefs on climate”science” around the question “how long have we been there to consistently measure climate globally?” We did the same with Covid, basing our perception of it on when we started measuring it.
I knew the world was already "mid Covid" when we started counting cases. And just like punch buggies, and when you buy a new car or discover a new word, you begin to see it everywhere. The people that believe that the words, cars, and climate changes based on their perception of it are those people I really want to sell things to.
"asia is more than half of all CO2 emissions. their output has basically tripled since the early 90’s and accounts for more than 100% of the global rise. any plan that does not involve them is a clear joke. and yet none seem to."
That's because 'climate change' is just an excuse to shotgun ourselves in the face while China takes over.
Great work! The thing about the consensus question is that it is essentially just opinion on opinions. It perpetuates the illusion that the letters following the names of “experts” transmute their utterings into “evidence.” It obscures actual data. Just like modeling, which serves as the primary source of “evidence” for the AGW crowd. In short, their version of the scientific method seems to be one that fastidiously insulates their desired conclusions from objective reality.
“mere patent clerks must not be allowed to opine on physics, this is the province of experts!”
*a novel explanation for The Photoelectric Effect has entered the chat*
They say Elvis got turned down by the first four labels he auditioned for. BigMedia is basically just part of Team Clerisy along with BigGov, BigAcademia, BigTikTok.
Brilliant essay dear gato! Senor choochoo 🤣almost choked on my coffee reading that. Spot on throughout !
Incredibly thorough piece - well done my feline friend. Now if we can just get the rest of the world to see the farce that is being perpetrated on us we will have won.
"those elevated to power were not the best and brightest, mostly they were dangerously unqualified dullards chosen for political purpose, ideological purity, and a proven willingness to lie about anything and everything in service of “the cause."" That about sums up almost everyone in government and their 3 letter agencies as well as the captured news media. I have reached a place where I have run out of damns to give. I feel we have been gas lit on all sides for so long it is just walk away because we are on our own anyway. But, I know I can't really do that. Some level of opposition must be maintained. I just have to pick my battles, as does everybody. For other issues I just come down to "you do you" and it becomes live and let die. Cheerful today, ain't I !