This entire time my most important question has gone unanswered: If my doctor and I both think Ivermectin can help, why is that anybody else's business?
No pharmacist shall dispense hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine except when written as prescribed for an FDA-approved indication; or as part of a state approved clinical trial related to COVID-19 for a patient who has tested positive for COVID-19, with such test result documented as part of the prescription. No other experimental or prophylactic use shall be permitted, and any permitted prescription is limited to one fourteen day prescription with no refills.
I hope they trialing HCQ in combination with Azythromycin. Seperately, no effect. In combination, could block both pathways into the cell: ace receptor, and the other one (you can tell, I'm not a virologist).
never rule out malice in an open question on cause.....
i think >65 there are a lot more frail than not, my theory:
the breakthroughs are very rough on frail....
on cape cod the demographic is one susceptible to aids, maybe the vaxx is not useful for immuno suppressed
my (over 70 yoa) bet here on i will not do a booster, i will do good personal health and add quercetin if the cases spike nearby
"The Father wove the skein of your life a long time ago. Go and hide in a hole if you wish, but you won’t live one instant longer. Your fate is fixed. Fear profits a man nothing."
It's neither. It's like minded thinking on the part of deranged collectivists who have suffered in silence for years due to social isolation brought on by the proliferation of personal high tech devices. It's a mental health crisis involving half of the population. Individualists are clueless because they're uniquely wired for social isolation. Collecivists are hurting, and this is the inevitable backlash, a desperate attempt at unity. Sadly though, this isn't going to heal them. It'll only spread their misery to individualists. What they desperately need is community and social connection on a personal level, a sense of belonging on a group level, not virtual. I don't think they know this. They only know they are anxious (easily mistaken for fear) and unfulfilled, and they're lashing out in the only way they know how.
I wish people would stop using this phrase. What we are enduring now is a permutation of the form of socialism invested by Mussolini, which he preferred to call "corporatism", for which "fascism" and "national socialism" are synonyms.
This bears no resemblance to actual capitalism, which basically comes down to a free market where people voluntarily transact with each other without coercive interference or control by the State.
Using the term capitalism to describe a form of socialism is deceptive and smears an economic system that is responsible for nearly all the progress and wealth in the world.
This may seem like a minor quibble, but language is important, especially in the face of the all-out assault by the left on truth and any unapproved freedom of economic or personal behavior.
We should not play their game and insist on the proper meaning of words.
Right at the start of this, my first thought was 'so how long has this thing been around?' Since then no one seems to have done any real work on that. The second was, 'so what therapeutics can we use?', as there are plenty with strong potential. Then all we saw was active suppression of any attempts at this.
If there is any conspiracy in this, that is where it sits.
Everything you write has so much common sense to it. I wish I could get people to listen, especially my husband's employer. Funny thing is, he's an academic at a university and they are telling him he has to take the jab when he's already had covid. Can't make this up. Supposedly smart people with 3 letters after their names, won't consider any research he provides them on immunity derived from natural infection. It's get the jab or you lose your job. I can't believe this is America.
Brazil is the same way. People take Ivermectina and reporters bitch on TV saying it doesnt work. Brazil just is copying the US (wait til the summer riots next year --- well, winter in Brazil). Glad to see AMLO having a brain cell that itsnt tied to CNN and NYT thougth leaders.
You should win a Pulitzer prize for this article. You won't, of course, given the world in which we live. But, you should. Thank you, Kitty Cat. You have once again centered me in a science-based reality.
This is outstanding. Thank you for all the work you are putting into diving deep into this dangerous cesspit of corruption, regulatory capture, unheard of levels of medical malfeasance and blatant abuse of statistics for propaganda purposes. You are doing a great job. Keep it up.
Zimbabwe solved Covid with Ivermectin. Jackie Stone is my hero. We all know Big Pharma would have lost their EUA if Ivermectin had been approved. Moderna specifically would have gone insolvent. The fear of losing everything is even greater than the greed of making billions.
Sensing the end of their reign of terror the media whores are in full throttle today with two different stories (one written by the NYT and trafficked by their estimable acolytes at "Yahoo News") about people who derided the vaccines and must now pay for their apostasy with their lives. Not a word about any other factors involved (obesity being one) for that would adulterate the clear message: this is what you get when you look up the ass of the Almighty. The propaganda has reached DEFCON 5 and my mind that's a good thing.
This needs to be a clear and resounding victory for Universal Collectivist Humanism, in which everyone in a member. Using old drugs and people doing different things muddled the picture. It's only pure, glorious unity (or at least the quest of it) that will cure our anxiety and restore peace and hope to the world!
i doubt it. you're likely in the $10-30 million range for starters. easy for a government or a big pharma co, but steep for individuals and private labs
Not-Google Ziverdo and you'll see lots of so-called main stream sites "debunking" it for various reasons. How does an ordinary person decide, when we see constant studies published on both directions and stories of pharma funding shady practices swirl around everything?
This entire time my most important question has gone unanswered: If my doctor and I both think Ivermectin can help, why is that anybody else's business?
In the United Progressive States of America, EVERYTHING is the State's business.
Don't forget that "we" are all in this together, so "we" need to have control over every aspect of your life.
To Keep Us All Safe™, don't you know.
all reason and thinking went away with c19.
seems patient/md relations are controlled by the collective using covid to change the social contract
Is your doctor prevented from prescribing Ivermectin?
idk, my doc is in mass, iirc mass was early in not banning hcq.
only c19 patient i have ever known, nh resident, jan 21 received an anti biotic and a steroid and recovered she is >70
Doctors certainly were, yes.
Even for deworming?
https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/no-20210-continuing-temporary-suspension-and-modification-laws-relating-disaster-emergency
No pharmacist shall dispense hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine except when written as prescribed for an FDA-approved indication; or as part of a state approved clinical trial related to COVID-19 for a patient who has tested positive for COVID-19, with such test result documented as part of the prescription. No other experimental or prophylactic use shall be permitted, and any permitted prescription is limited to one fourteen day prescription with no refills.
I hope they trialing HCQ in combination with Azythromycin. Seperately, no effect. In combination, could block both pathways into the cell: ace receptor, and the other one (you can tell, I'm not a virologist).
Why do they blame the unvaccinated when the fully vaxxed infect the fully vaxxed?
Why do they continue to push the jabs when they've just admitted they don't work as advertised?
Why are they advocating another dose of the jab for last year's virus to protect against next year's virus?
Why do they continue to advocate for "vaccine passports" when they've just admitted the jabs don't prevent infection or transmission?
Why do they push mandates when they've just admitted the jabs don't prevent infection or transmission?
Why are they claiming that the Delta variant is more dangerous when the data from the UK clearly show it is less deadly?
*************
As of 7/19/2021...
Unvaxxed: 121,402 cases/165 deaths/0.1359%
Unvaxxed <50: 119,063 cases/34 deaths/0.0286%
Unvaxxed 50+: 2,337 cases/131 deaths/5.606%
Fully Vaxxed: 28,773 cases/224 deaths/0.7785%
Fully Vaxxed <50: 15,346 cases/4 deaths/0.0260%
Fully Vaxxed 50+: 13,427 cases/220 deaths/1.6385%
24,952 Unlinked Infections
54,091 Partially Vaxxed Infections
28,773 Fully Vaxxed Infections
121,402 Unvaxxed Infections
There were 59 more deaths of fully vaxxed than unvaxxed.
124 more deaths of fully/partially vaxxed than unvaxxed.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1005517/Technical_Briefing_19.pdf?fbclid=IwAR16J9ORbW3JyOs2fYCeNaMp0EgLoUub46xFybWwFAxt52D0YtUKEqmzhS0
***********
Why do they claim that breakthrough infections are rare when they are not?
***********
"Another estimates that there are 35,000 symptomatic infections per week among 162 million vaccinated Americans."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/07/29/cdc-mask-guidance/?fbclid=IwAR3U2f3pnn3vLLlhYsbS3fiCed4DESHKaRRuf-mvdVtVsn1KHTlxNdZ2RGg
**************************
I don't know if money and grift and cya are sufficient to explain the reality we live in right now.
Is it failure or is it a plan?
If you spend a few minutes to read this thread
https://mobile.twitter.com/Kingbingo_/status/1419293260468690946
and then this one
https://t.co/hhv134Rkyh?amp=1
it will be clear what every element of the virus event govt responses worldwide
were and are intended to accomplish
and why
it IS a 'failure'
but not in the sense I think you suggest
do you have a U.S. Social Security # ?
think forward from there
Thanks for sharing this.
never rule out malice in an open question on cause.....
i think >65 there are a lot more frail than not, my theory:
the breakthroughs are very rough on frail....
on cape cod the demographic is one susceptible to aids, maybe the vaxx is not useful for immuno suppressed
my (over 70 yoa) bet here on i will not do a booster, i will do good personal health and add quercetin if the cases spike nearby
"The Father wove the skein of your life a long time ago. Go and hide in a hole if you wish, but you won’t live one instant longer. Your fate is fixed. Fear profits a man nothing."
so believed vikings....
It's neither. It's like minded thinking on the part of deranged collectivists who have suffered in silence for years due to social isolation brought on by the proliferation of personal high tech devices. It's a mental health crisis involving half of the population. Individualists are clueless because they're uniquely wired for social isolation. Collecivists are hurting, and this is the inevitable backlash, a desperate attempt at unity. Sadly though, this isn't going to heal them. It'll only spread their misery to individualists. What they desperately need is community and social connection on a personal level, a sense of belonging on a group level, not virtual. I don't think they know this. They only know they are anxious (easily mistaken for fear) and unfulfilled, and they're lashing out in the only way they know how.
Latter.
I see UK data from the last interim report and having no effect in slowing infection among 50% (slightly negative actually) and 20% in under 50.
Overall VE on severe infections is still robust at ~70% in both groups though its declining.
Adjusted CFR is about 1/3 of Alpha on similar testing.
that seems roughly right, but it's only half the equation.
one must also consider the risks and adverse events from the vaccines.
it's odd to me that people are focusing so myopically on only one side of the risk/benefit equation.
i suspect "cases" as defined by "positive PCR" are just a bad metric.
vaccines do look to mitigate severe covid and death.
that's not really the question.
the question is "at what price?" and "is there a better way to accomplish much the same?"
That myopic view defines Covid from the very beginning.
"where's the safety data"
it is in vaers, and it is being ignored by the order of covidian preachers.
i am old enough to remember spiro agnew: "nattering nabobs of negativity"....
what would he say now.....
"crony capitalism"
I wish people would stop using this phrase. What we are enduring now is a permutation of the form of socialism invested by Mussolini, which he preferred to call "corporatism", for which "fascism" and "national socialism" are synonyms.
This bears no resemblance to actual capitalism, which basically comes down to a free market where people voluntarily transact with each other without coercive interference or control by the State.
Using the term capitalism to describe a form of socialism is deceptive and smears an economic system that is responsible for nearly all the progress and wealth in the world.
This may seem like a minor quibble, but language is important, especially in the face of the all-out assault by the left on truth and any unapproved freedom of economic or personal behavior.
We should not play their game and insist on the proper meaning of words.
Right at the start of this, my first thought was 'so how long has this thing been around?' Since then no one seems to have done any real work on that. The second was, 'so what therapeutics can we use?', as there are plenty with strong potential. Then all we saw was active suppression of any attempts at this.
If there is any conspiracy in this, that is where it sits.
Everything you write has so much common sense to it. I wish I could get people to listen, especially my husband's employer. Funny thing is, he's an academic at a university and they are telling him he has to take the jab when he's already had covid. Can't make this up. Supposedly smart people with 3 letters after their names, won't consider any research he provides them on immunity derived from natural infection. It's get the jab or you lose your job. I can't believe this is America.
Brazil is the same way. People take Ivermectina and reporters bitch on TV saying it doesnt work. Brazil just is copying the US (wait til the summer riots next year --- well, winter in Brazil). Glad to see AMLO having a brain cell that itsnt tied to CNN and NYT thougth leaders.
Muy importante. I would add that "this alone is outright bizarre" might could be changed to "outright criminal."
You should win a Pulitzer prize for this article. You won't, of course, given the world in which we live. But, you should. Thank you, Kitty Cat. You have once again centered me in a science-based reality.
This is outstanding. Thank you for all the work you are putting into diving deep into this dangerous cesspit of corruption, regulatory capture, unheard of levels of medical malfeasance and blatant abuse of statistics for propaganda purposes. You are doing a great job. Keep it up.
dr. zelenko, permanently banned from twitter, like someone we know.......
use: hcq, a common antibiotic and zinc for an exposure/early symptoms
used hcq, vit d and zinc for protection w/o exposure.
querectin over the counter can be substituted for hcq.
next flu/c19 season i will use the querectin, i do vit d and zinc all the time.
i am vaxxed and red cross found anti bodies in late may from a donation i made
still......
This is so important, thank you for the hard work
Zimbabwe solved Covid with Ivermectin. Jackie Stone is my hero. We all know Big Pharma would have lost their EUA if Ivermectin had been approved. Moderna specifically would have gone insolvent. The fear of losing everything is even greater than the greed of making billions.
Sensing the end of their reign of terror the media whores are in full throttle today with two different stories (one written by the NYT and trafficked by their estimable acolytes at "Yahoo News") about people who derided the vaccines and must now pay for their apostasy with their lives. Not a word about any other factors involved (obesity being one) for that would adulterate the clear message: this is what you get when you look up the ass of the Almighty. The propaganda has reached DEFCON 5 and my mind that's a good thing.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/spurned-vaccine-now-want-know-141207155.html
This needs to be a clear and resounding victory for Universal Collectivist Humanism, in which everyone in a member. Using old drugs and people doing different things muddled the picture. It's only pure, glorious unity (or at least the quest of it) that will cure our anxiety and restore peace and hope to the world!
How much money would be needed to do it? Could we crowd source the funding?
i doubt it. you're likely in the $10-30 million range for starters. easy for a government or a big pharma co, but steep for individuals and private labs
Not-Google Ziverdo and you'll see lots of so-called main stream sites "debunking" it for various reasons. How does an ordinary person decide, when we see constant studies published on both directions and stories of pharma funding shady practices swirl around everything?