"Using PCR threshold cycle (Ct) data from a single large contract laboratory, we show that individuals in Wisconsin, USA had similar viral loads in nasal swabs, irrespective of vaccine status, during a time of high and increasing prevalence of the Delta variant. Infectious SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from 51 of 55 specimens (93%) with Ct <25 from both vaccinated and unvaccinated persons, indicating that most individuals with Ct values in this range (Wilson 95% CI 83%-97%) shed infectious virus regardless of vaccine status. Notably, 68% of individuals infected despite vaccination tested positive with Ct <25, including at least 8 who were asymptomatic at the time of testing."
design of the efficacy trial obvious over stated the test object by 8 fold!
there is no adequate safety data, the human body must be observed for 3 or more years, advent of side effects is not like electric circyuit failure propagation! which is the trick they use to say it is safe
the suspension of liability is bc the cdc/fda oversaw gross negligence
An honest question. With regards to idea that the recovered immunity is stronger and vastly more sterilizing than vaccinated - did this come out of a study? Would love to take a look.
I also think it's possible the hospital staff see the results of vaccination injury. Another factor in their refusal to be a part of this experiment.
It is long past the point where these completely irrational, destructive decisions must be deliberate.
The banality of evil is upon us.
I am not vaccine hesitant. I flat out refuse.
"Using PCR threshold cycle (Ct) data from a single large contract laboratory, we show that individuals in Wisconsin, USA had similar viral loads in nasal swabs, irrespective of vaccine status, during a time of high and increasing prevalence of the Delta variant. Infectious SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from 51 of 55 specimens (93%) with Ct <25 from both vaccinated and unvaccinated persons, indicating that most individuals with Ct values in this range (Wilson 95% CI 83%-97%) shed infectious virus regardless of vaccine status. Notably, 68% of individuals infected despite vaccination tested positive with Ct <25, including at least 8 who were asymptomatic at the time of testing."
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387v3
Nice to see el gato on Substack. Twitter, living up to its name ever more loudly, is not the place for bright cats.
we know a lot more now than in mar 2021.
design of the efficacy trial obvious over stated the test object by 8 fold!
there is no adequate safety data, the human body must be observed for 3 or more years, advent of side effects is not like electric circyuit failure propagation! which is the trick they use to say it is safe
the suspension of liability is bc the cdc/fda oversaw gross negligence
List of US hospitals that are requiring the jab...
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/workforce/hospitals-health-systems-mandating-vaccines-for-workersjune17.html?origin=BHRE&utm_source=BHRE&utm_medium=email&utm_content=newsletter&oly_enc_id=4291B1376667H5I
An honest question. With regards to idea that the recovered immunity is stronger and vastly more sterilizing than vaccinated - did this come out of a study? Would love to take a look.
Que bueno! Mais gente dever se renunciar logo. Parabens.