13 Comments

I also think it's possible the hospital staff see the results of vaccination injury. Another factor in their refusal to be a part of this experiment.

Expand full comment

Ray Charles could see that the VAERS data does not support a description of "safe and effective" and if he missed it, Stevie Wonder could point it out.

Expand full comment
founding

It is long past the point where these completely irrational, destructive decisions must be deliberate.

The banality of evil is upon us.

Expand full comment

The nakedness of the B.S. is startling! It is almost like "our leaders" are bad versions of Austin Powers who actually think they are international men of mystery whose bad decisions and questionable actions are invisible to the naked eye.

Expand full comment

I am not vaccine hesitant. I flat out refuse.

Expand full comment

"Using PCR threshold cycle (Ct) data from a single large contract laboratory, we show that individuals in Wisconsin, USA had similar viral loads in nasal swabs, irrespective of vaccine status, during a time of high and increasing prevalence of the Delta variant. Infectious SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from 51 of 55 specimens (93%) with Ct <25 from both vaccinated and unvaccinated persons, indicating that most individuals with Ct values in this range (Wilson 95% CI 83%-97%) shed infectious virus regardless of vaccine status. Notably, 68% of individuals infected despite vaccination tested positive with Ct <25, including at least 8 who were asymptomatic at the time of testing."

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387v3

Expand full comment

Nice to see el gato on Substack. Twitter, living up to its name ever more loudly, is not the place for bright cats.

Expand full comment

we know a lot more now than in mar 2021.

design of the efficacy trial obvious over stated the test object by 8 fold!

there is no adequate safety data, the human body must be observed for 3 or more years, advent of side effects is not like electric circyuit failure propagation! which is the trick they use to say it is safe

the suspension of liability is bc the cdc/fda oversaw gross negligence

Expand full comment

shorter: the consumer risk of accepting the efficacy claims is now near 90%

the consumer risk of safety claim is 100% bc it is untested.

Expand full comment

An honest question. With regards to idea that the recovered immunity is stronger and vastly more sterilizing than vaccinated - did this come out of a study? Would love to take a look.

Expand full comment

Link to the Cleveland Clinic preprint contained within the article.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210608/No-point-vaccinating-those-whoe28099ve-had-COVID-19-Findings-of-Cleveland-Clinic-study.aspx

Also, the CDC claim that a study out of Kentucky proved C19 recovered have a higher risk than the vaxxed was misleading. The study was cherrypicked from all 50 states, and it compared recovered to recovered plus vaxx. Also, NIH Director Francis Collins gave the relative rate of infection...rather than the absolute rate. Very dishonest.

https://twitter.com/MartinKulldorff/status/1426607041406251009

Expand full comment

Que bueno! Mais gente dever se renunciar logo. Parabens.

Expand full comment