193 Comments

All of this while people are being fired from jobs - healthcare and military too, even IF they have had Covid. We are seriously running out of time to mobilize against this. The mandates must end and even continuing the vaccine program is a question we must ponder.

Expand full comment

Interesting thing to watch for....100% compliance hospitals and business and the amount of positive CV cases among them.

Expand full comment

when patriots coach belichek let cam newton go bc he refused the harmful jab a reported asked about vax v unvaxed in the lockeroom bill said vax and unvaxed the same

the story was newton and not bill being honest with short words bill.

Expand full comment

Reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. The UK is not seeing the fully vaxxed be infected at a greater rate, in a way explainable by base rate fallacy. Scandinavian countries are not halting Moderna for some or all demographics because of short-term safety signals. Natural immunity is not sufficient, and definitely not more effective vs. Delta than vaccination alone.

Get vaccinated. It is the final, most essential command.

Expand full comment

Boy have you been brainwashed!

Expand full comment

I think he forgot the /s

;-)

Expand full comment

It was a rift on 1984.

Great book, awesome author ;)

Expand full comment

*in a way UNexplainable by base rate fallacy

Oof.

Expand full comment

You are joking, right? Right?

Expand full comment

PSYOP-19 was Phase 1, and is about to escalate to PSYOP-21, where the actual pandemic is the "vax" and the coverup is the "variants" propaganda. Phase 3 is going to be even more the horror show. Stay strong.

Expand full comment

While Pharma makes billions and authoritarian Government actors around the world hang their careers on the vaccine we won't have any kind of honest, open study on the effect they are having. Maybe in a hundred years.

Have to say, I was weary of the nonexistent long term testing but I never expected to see the vaccines fail so soon. Less than a year and they've completely lost any legitimacy imo. The overt authoritarian pressure and Pharma's crazy dishonest behaviour surrounding them has permanently damaged my confidence in future vaccines, too.

Expand full comment

Yeah, basically this has pushed me into being fully anti-vaccine. I never used to be but this shit show proves vaccines and the companies who make them cannot be trusted.

Expand full comment

This is exactly what happened to me too. I'm not even sorry about it.

Expand full comment

Even if they called a halt to all vaxxing tomorrow, I suspect there is enough damage to credibility that it will haunt institutions for decades. A relatively useless set of vaccines would be relatively easy to forgive. But if serious vaxx-related injuries and deaths pile up, that will be much worse. Perhaps the worst thing, beyond excessive deaths, is if the slow-motion tyranny continues apace. 😟

Expand full comment

Something that I forgot to add, but is mention in Denninger's post is we are being told that the virus is evading the vaccine. While that may in part be true, why are the titers dropping so quickly from synthetic immunity? Is it due to lack of B Cell memory recall? Remember the Japan study that showed no detectable antibodies after 198 days? Did they know this and is that why they "cranked up" the dosing to overcompensate for fact that these Amazing and Wonderful feats of medical technology just fizz out like a dud firecracker?

Expand full comment

If you look at the titers of the vaxes post jab, they are 10-100x higher than the sero-recovered and the decay at a significantly higher rate as well. This begs the question, why dose the patient to achieve such high titers? Did they know the decay rate was so fast they a "standard" dose would have made the trials fail well before the truncated 4 months period?

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243442

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.22.457114v1.full.pdf

Expand full comment

from page 3 of the UK Health Security Agency report: "Based on antibody testing of blood donors, 98.0% of the adult population now have antibodies to COVID-19 from either infection or vaccination compared to 19.0% that have antibodies from infection alone. Over 96% of adults aged 17 or older have antibodies from either infection or vaccination.

98% with antibodies and cases going up yet within the same report they claim 65-95% effective.

el gato malo - my guess is that the only reason the vax shows much effectiveness at all is due to those who have had covid, recovered and then were vaccinated. In these cases it is not the vax being effective but natural immunity.

Expand full comment

I have wondered about this. So many people had the infection and the vaccine. They are attributing success to the vaccines when it may be immunity from the infection.

Expand full comment

exactly. vaccines didn't start until a year (maybe longer) later and they refused to measure who had prior immunity before giving the vaccines. AND the specifically declare that "people who've had covid STILL NEED the shot." So yeah, no way now to pull the two groups apart. Excellent way to make it look like it works. And the data from the initial study was beyond weak.

Expand full comment

Yes, I’m wondering if the vax actually doesn’t work at all.

Expand full comment

And seasonality, and attenuation.

One reason They are pushing the vax so hard is this whole thing would end anyway if only the most vulnerable got the vax and none of things government did made much difference but government agnecies and pols needs to look like they were the saviors

Expand full comment

We've been watching this picture develop like a Polaroid print, and now it's pretty clearly in focus.

Congratulations to Biden and others who are championing the mandates and pushing for them to be forced on lower and lower age groups. Doing their part to prolong the pandemic while at the same time reversing a 200+ year run of the ideal of personal freedom.

Expand full comment

A run which turns out to have been rather isolated to a few states. American states in the northeast and West coast throughout the 1800s and 1900s were public health board autocracies ruling over compliant cowards.

Expand full comment

I rather think we've since shown them up as rank amateurs, mere dabblers in the arts of tyranny.

Expand full comment

If one was making it worse with vaccines and one had also coerced people into taking them and even mandated them, how could we possibly expect one to do anything other than double down to the bitter end? One would do anything to stop that truth from being revealed.

Expand full comment

Could we skip to the bitter end now please? Missing out the bit where we drag children into the experiment.

Expand full comment

Its shocking that the worse the vaccines fail, the more the government is pushing them. Forcing them. To the point of ruining careers. This is sinister.

Expand full comment

https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/06/world-renowned-psychiatrist-global-predators-fauci-gates-and-schwab-behind-the-covid-reign-of-terror/

“The doctor said that it was important to disabuse people of the notion that the pandemic is a result of bad luck. The terrible state of affairs throughout the globe is not the result of chance, he maintained, stressing that people need to stop questioning why policymakers are making so many counterproductive decisions.

“It’s time to face it and get rid of the idea that this is chance, or crazy, or bizarre, or makes no sense,” Breggin said.”

Expand full comment

I got a copy of the draft of Breggin's new book by odering before the end of August. It's pretty damning and has ~ 1000 citations. Looking forward to RFK's due out shortly to compare notes.

Expand full comment

What a terrifying article. He's right, though. I knew something was seriously wrong when they destroyed HCQ , rather than embracing it for treatment. If Covid was as serious as they were telling us, and HCQ was well known, safe, effective and inexpensive, there was zero downside to trying it. Worst case - it didn't work. But if it did, then pandemic over, people saved! Yay! But no, they screeched so loudly and made such a mockery of it all, it was obvious they weren't looking to help people and something else was going on.

Expand full comment

Yowza. Thanks for the harrowing data and accompanying analysis. I was thinking ADE and then you echoed my suspicions.

I suspect Israeli data would only reinforce your conclusions. A spread accelerant, indeed. Yeah, let’s keep screaming toward that concrete wall at warp speed. How very scientific.

Expand full comment

Damn! This confirms my fears of this vax strategy. We're heading into a dim fall and a dark winter - this combined with a dark age in science and data collection and misinformation. A rational human is now confined to "gut feel" for the way forward. Good times ahead!

Expand full comment

When the vaxxines started to fail, I wondered if it was waning immunity or the Delta variant or both. It seems it is both. Isn't injecting people again with another dose of last year's potion going to increase the risk of ADE?

Expand full comment

Due to original antigenic sin, re-injecting them with the same original Wuhan spike peptide will do nothing but RECALL all of their old, original antibodies they made to their first vaccines. That’s how this phenomenon got its cute little name. Boosteroos and Boosterettes are only subjecting themselves to more spike-induced peptide harms including, but not limited to cardiovascular, hematological, neurological, and immunological harms.

Expand full comment

My knowledge of immunology is pretty kindergarten (but probably most of us here meet that definition!) Still, I envision the way the mRNA jabs work is they essentially make the immune system make up a huge order of antibodies (T cell?) against the spike protein and nothing else. This temporarily (you hope it's temporary) overtaxes the immune system, which may explain the 2 week "worry window" as Gato calls it. Mel, you probably have it pegged. A booster is just forcing the body to produce more of the "last year's model" antibodies, that may be less effective against the latest variants. Perhaps totally ineffective. A better technique, which perhaps we'll see, would be boosters tailored to the latest mutations. Of course, this probably would not avoid all, perhaps none, of the existing faults of the jabs, known and unknown.

When one takes a dose of an mRNA product, how long does the body's immune system remain out of whack, that is, in worse than normal defensive mode? Does anyone really know?

Expand full comment

Thanks for posting this. Let me see if I understand your point, using my less-than-kindergarten level of immunology understanding. Because they did nothing to "improve" the vaccine(s) against subsequent strains, and why would they, if they can sell the same crap for more loot, the effect is actually positive in terms of ADE? (Even if negative for all the original reasons!)

Expand full comment

yes, along with the risks of myocarditis and thrombosis......

ADE ONE THING

and associated protein/immune response with neirologic antipathy....

Expand full comment

the government declares "war on drugs" opioid OD deaths do up not down, government creates the federal reserve to fight inflation and ends up creating cosmic levels of inflation and destroys the currency in a crack up hyperinflationary death spiral ( which will happen soon). Government tries to make housing and college more affordable, these things end up becoming more expensive. See the trend here? OK one more. Gov tries to spread "democracy" and remake entire societies into friendly client states, ends up destabilizing the world wasting trillions and countless innocent lives are lost. So we really dont need charts and graphs to see where this is going. gov tries to "save" us from a virus the result: millions of people die in a mass causality event because this non sterilizing gene therapy triggered ADE and bred superbugs. Systemic failure on a global scale.

Expand full comment

When ideology supercedes objectivity then Chernobyl-like events are more likely to happen, and that it seems is what we are witnessing in real time.

But this "Chernobyl" will be a lot worse than the original one.

Expand full comment

This could still be the Covid vaccinated playing catch-up after the evaporation of infection efficacy / "sterilizing" immunity. I would bet $104.62 it is more than catch-up, however. What is needed is to compare seroprevalence for N protein in another month or so, which should indicate whether the Covid vaccinated ended up being more infected per cap.

I forget if I already posted that here on another thread.

Expand full comment

Yikes! This made me revisit this addendum: (from this publication... 'mRNA, Nanolipid Particles and PEG: A Triad Never Used in Clinical Vaccines is Going to Be Tested on Hundreds of Millions of People'...(https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.005501.php)

"In view of the previously detailed information, the question we must ask ourselves is at what point should we place the new Pfizer mRNA vaccine and Moderna that contain mRNA wrapped in LNP and PEG. If there is verifiable data that this technology has been used to introduce genetic material into the nucleus, to treat cancer and other genetic diseases, we simply cannot accept that this vaccine will not do it, especially when no specific studies were carried out at the preclinical level to evaluate said effect. If we also know that eukaryotic cells have their own endogenous RTs and that they are capable of converting RNA into DNA, how can you ensure that this vaccine will not integrate into our genome? There are too many doubts in this regard to authorize the clinical use of vaccines of this type. Manufacturers of mRNA vaccines claim that since they do not use the entire virus, its use cannot infect those vaccinated. However, since vaccination in residences began, massive infections and deaths have been originating among the elderly in these residences. This is an undeniable clinical fact, and no one gives an adequate answer to why these infections originate shortly after vaccination [77,78]. In our opinion, its indiscriminate use in hundreds of millions of people around the world to prevent a disease with a mortality in the general population between 0.3 and 1% [79] is simply a reckless lack in ethical sense."

Expand full comment

First sentence doesn't even make sense

Expand full comment

agree. The first sentence wasn't constructed properly, but old Gen X folks like me, retired from medical field, understand the point and get what the author was trying to convey. I do not care about sentence structure and proper english, I do care about the content and what the author is exposing. Did you read the whole article? I put the link in, for context to the addendum.

Expand full comment