141 Comments
May 10, 2022Liked by el gato malo

And what about the PRECLINICAL studies? I have not heard one word about any that were done anywhere. I worked 37 years as a data technician for MPI Research, and this going straight to human (clinical) testing is simply not done! Before one ever tests anything in humans there is a whole battery of preclinical animal studies that need to be conducted, of varying lengths and in different species, looking at things like carcinogenicity, neurotoxicity, reproductive problems, cardiovascular problems. Where is the data for these studies? Who did them? (Hint: It wasn't MPI!)

Expand full comment
author

this is an excellent question and one i have wondered about myself.

mRNA has a seriously nasty history in animals both in terms of failing safety trials for therapeutics and awful outcomes from vaccines, esp around auto-immune triggering and flat out cytokine storm cascades akin to dengue 2.

if these trials took place, i sure have never seen them.

if they did not, well, that's just horrifying.

i have a sneaky suspicion that this predates pfizer and moderna and that to get at those animal trials (and just where the NIH and bioNtech got their mRNA drugs in such a hurry) we're going to wind up in china before long and names like daszak, baric, etc are going to pop up again.

Expand full comment

Well, I can tell you that as far as I know (and I believe that I was in a position to know) that MPI Research was NOT working on mRNA studies back in 2017 when my position was eliminated prior to MPI's sale to Charles River. MPI Research was at the time one of the top three preclinical research laboratories in the nation (the other two being Charles River and Covance). As such it would have been entirely logical for MPI to be involved in such research, but I do not recall hearing about any discussions on the subject. I think that you are right, that the road leads to China.

Expand full comment
May 10, 2022·edited May 10, 2022Liked by el gato malo

Found it.. these are just examples that jump out to a non-science person but the entire section looks to be filled with questionable assumptions and substantial equivalents.

2.4.3.2. Methods of Analysis

No methods of analysis have been validated to support GLP TK studies of components of BNT162b2; however, a qualified LC/MS method was developed to support quantitation of the two novel LNP excipients for the non-GLP IV PK study in rats.

2.4.3.3.1. In Vitro Absorption

No absorption studies were conducted for BNT162b2, as the administration route is IM.

2.4.3.3.2. Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics

An intravenous rat PK study (PF-07302048_06Jul20_072424; Tabulated Summary 2.6.5.3)was performed using LNPs containing surrogate luciferase RNA, with the identical lipid composition as BNT162b2.

Pharmacokinetic studies have not been conducted with BNT162b2 and are generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005; WHO, 2014)

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_24_nonclinical-overview.pdf

Expand full comment
author
May 10, 2022·edited May 10, 2022Author

thanks.

a PK study is just looking at absorption rates and blood serum levels.

it does not address efficacy or safety.

so this is of pretty limited clinical value.

this study also did not even use the actual drug.

"was performed using LNPs containing surrogate luciferase RNA"

it used lipid nanoparticles with a payload of bioluminescent oxidative enzymes.

you would generally do animal studies for toxicity, safety, side effects, and possibly even efficacy before going to humans.

PK is an initial babystep.

Expand full comment

Pre-clinical testing was done, and IMO, presented insufficient evidence to move to clinical trials. See my analysis here:

https://secureservercdn.net/166.62.107.20/e1v.c54.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/FactsYouNeedToKnow.pdf

Expand full comment

Gallows humor: They will not get feedback from the dead. I was torn between smile and teeth clenching.

Expand full comment

I have been thinking this was all tested by DOD DTRA types in classified operations years before. David Martin's patent history helps to provide the framework for that supposition. So when they went out "Warp Speed" they handed a partly tested product to Moderna, Pfizer.

Expand full comment

Pfizer issued a press release in September 2020 giving info on pre-clinical trials with mice and rhesus macaques. I haven’t looked at in detail.

https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-announce-data-preclinical-studies-mrna

Expand full comment

I have, and I wrote about it last year. It was a horrible study from such the only potential "benefit" (could be detriment) they could cite was insanely elevated IgG levels which is no evidence of any level of efficacy.

https://secureservercdn.net/166.62.107.20/e1v.c54.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/FactsYouNeedToKnow.pdf

Expand full comment

I vaguely remember the existence of said animal studies being a “fact checked” conspiracy this time last year, with something along the lines of they were done simultaneously or on the back of previous studies, but never providing the source.

Expand full comment

I'm not doubting what anyone said, I am just saying that if animal studies were conducted, they were not conducted while I was at MPI Research. I know of only one study where it was decided not to proceed further due to extremely high mortality in the test subjects. This study did not involve mRNA. It may very well be that the animal studies were conducted elsewhere. However, because of my background in the field, I was deeply, deeply suspicious of the vaccines right from the start. I felt that we were not being given enough information, at least I was not being given enough information, to make a truly informed decision, and I stand by what I said. I believe that these so-called vaccines were rushed into production and that shortcuts were taken.

Expand full comment

Sorry, my tone didn’t come through correctly. I don’t believe the “fact checkers” one iota. Their explanation was sufficient for the person who reads their article and stops seeking, but digging deeper you can find references to the challenges that mRNA had in animal trials as late as 2018, especially when it came to multi course treatments because of increasing toxicity.

Basically, they Jedi mind tricked the world that that step had been properly done.

Expand full comment

darpa pandemic prevention platform (PPP) hired moderna in 2013 to do mrna....

Expand full comment

The following is probably a gross over-simplification, owing to me being a layman whose knowledge is limited to reading sites like this, as well as the occasional book like RFK Jr.'s slightly unflattering biography of Fauci.

There may be others who've covered it, but Whitney Webb's two articles (haven't found the third part in a promised trilogy) seems to give a good account of Moderna's shady past.

TLDR: Moderna is inextricably linked to shadowy government projects. They had been trying for years for save and effective mRNA therapies for cancer etc. Problem: mRNA in multiple doses was toxic or otherwise not indicated. So they unwillingly pivoted to vaccines which (in theory!) we single shot. Come the Covid-19 manufactured pandemic, they suddenly had a market for their product with little oversight, guaranteed markets and exemption from liability.

While Webb singles out Moderna, there is a whole eco-system of such firms and sundry government and NGO teats they rely upon. I'm not doubting that much of this is needful, but the problem is the risk of exploitation, which appears to have happened big time with the Covid-19 "vaccines."

Granted, I've never checked the literature other than a few superficial searches. Provisionally, I doubt there are any studies pre-Covid that show these mRNA therapies are of much good. If there were, they would have been shouted from the housetops. And something prior to EUA "vaccines" would have been the first commercial mRNA products, developed by something resembling traditional (harder) methods of proof.

I see no reason why BioNTech would not have faced the same technical problems. I've not seen any reports on their history, but perhaps one exists.

The real "crime" here is that -- perhaps -- no laws were broken, but it sure looks like ethics and standards were ignored in the mad rush for a "cure" which of course means big buck for the few well-connected. I doubt it'll ever see the light of day, but a forensic investigation into stock trades of MRNA and several other firms would probably reveal some very interesting patterns.

All that said, I would have no problem for judgments and long prison sentences for all involved, if it can ever be proven that fraud and other willful crimes were committed in the gold rush to force these shoddy, dangerous products upon a gullible populace.

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/10/investigative-reports/moderna-a-company-in-need-of-a-hail-mary/

Expand full comment

I will go back and look at my notes and try to find the reference to see if my memory is playing tricks but betcha a nickle there is a section that referenced previously published, animal trial studies and extrapolated from that.

Certainly it was the case with the LPN because the wording was so similar to the gmo food studies and use of the horrid concept of substantial equivalent as a scientific measure that did make a powerful impression.

Expand full comment

When people learn that under 5-12 was approved based on immunobridging to 16 year olds, and that immunobridging is just a fancier way of saying its a SWAG (Slightly Wild Ass Guess) i would hope they lose their minds, but probably not as they are begging for it under 5.

Expand full comment

Phangsters are seeking immunity and the only way is to get on the children's schedule.

Expand full comment

" immunobridging is just a fancier way of saying its a SWAG (Slightly Wild Ass Guess) "

Thank you, wonderful insights and so many more terrifying possibilities.

Expand full comment

I thought they were allowed to skip the animal trials because of "Operation Warp Speed."

Expand full comment

Someone suggested to Trump what became OWS. They KNEW what would happen.

They played Trump, and Trump knows it.

Expand full comment

I think that is why he clings to promoting the idea that the vaccine is GREAT!. People boo him. And not his detractors, but people who will vote for him. He would win a lot of hearts and minds if he would just lay out all the deep state ways that screw the everyman and consolidate power and money for the unelected government "servants". Lay it out, lock arms with the little guy and act like a savage when you get into office. He is surely wise to who the traitorous are. Get your "for the people"'s and get to shredding.

Expand full comment

trump's mistake was to hand over the keys to ivanka and her team.

he should have run the show himself. he got played.

Expand full comment

🙌 Preach!

Expand full comment

MERS DNA vaccine trials in South Korea : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28314561/

This is 2017 ! "DNA vaccine encoding Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus S1 protein induces protective immune responses in mice"

Expand full comment

I remember seeing the claim that animal trials of previous mrna vax candidates had shown safety, but not efficacy, so animal trials for safety were going to be done concurrent with human for efficacy, due to "emergency."

I still believed these lying psychopaths at that point. 😵

Expand full comment

Apparently the "new normal" as far as declaring a substance "safe" is that none of the subjects die immediately after exposure to the substance under test.

Expand full comment

There were the 44 french pregnant mice. Naomi Wolf talks about this in her posse's analysis. The outcomes there weren't good by the way.

Expand full comment

I have heard somewhere that mRNA has been around quite a while (decades?), they WERE tested on animals & the animals always died, which was why - until 2019 or so - they’d never been able to make them into “vaccines” for human use.

Expand full comment

I'm certainly no expert. But I've been reading this stuff for over two years now. "All the animals died" is, I think, one of the slogans (meme, if you like) of us vaccine skeptics. I have browsed a few clinical studies and there were some where large numbers of test animals sickened and died. (If it matters, it was for a non-mRNA SARS vaccine, if I recall). I'm only replying here to point out the problem of rumor: it's often inaccurate, sometimes completely so.

[Again, with limitation that I"m just a layman:] The worst indictments against mRNA probably are that it was of limited efficacy in earlier trials. Response to the "drug" quickly faded and/or there were other side effects. Multiple doses seemed problematic. This is why at least in Moderna's case, they moved to vaccine applications, even though it would be lower profit (single dose.) (Source: Whitney Webb articles). Oh, I almost forgot, there is little to no history of long-term safety, or even efficacy, for any mRNA product (so far as I know.) If such evidence existed, I'm sure we would have learnt of it by now.

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/10/investigative-reports/moderna-a-company-in-need-of-a-hail-mary/

Expand full comment

"no history of long-term safety," - the real issue. What is this novel creation actually doing in humans? What do we do with stories of reactivating long ago issues? Who is at risk from the jabs? Is anybody looking?

Expand full comment

I don’t disagree & I’m certainly no expert.

But virtually all rumors &/or conspiracy theories seem to be turning out to be true (spoiler alerts!) so almost anything is possible. What we DO know is that these are not “vaccines”, they have no ability to prevent spread or getting it, that they have dangerous & sometimes deadly side effects & that they were used as one of the most demonic “experiments” on human beings. Short & long term effects still largely unknown.

Expand full comment

That has been Malone's assertion so he was quite interested in the way Pfizer and Moderna were formulating their mRNA. He noted that in his 10 years he was not successful in defeating the immune system and his later 10 years of review affirmed how hard it was. We need someone of his caliber to dig into the data.

Expand full comment

I concur, and conclude that <they simply didn’t conduct those studies>.

Appalled? Knock me down with a feather.

I recently had cause to have Pfizer’s non clinical package reviewed at high level. Not the findings, simply a listing of what you’d expect to have been done vs what is in the regulatory dossier.

Most of the standard tests are absent.

Expand full comment

Pre-clinical testing was done, and IMO, presented insufficient evidence to move to clinical trials. See my analysis here:

https://secureservercdn.net/166.62.107.20/e1v.c54.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/FactsYouNeedToKnow.pdf

Expand full comment

Much less going direct to inject with the pregnant and breast feeding ladies. Not done.

Expand full comment

Animal mRNA studies of vaccines ended in dead animals.

Expand full comment

Actually, that's not a very good argument by itself and I'll tell you why. The majority of animal studies have 100% mortality. Why? Because ALL animals, including the controls (untreated) are generally euthanized at the end of study so that their organs and tissues can be examined and compared to the various dosage groups. So if someone asked me about Product X, and I said "all the animals died" technically I would be telling the truth, but I would not be telling the truth. What you want to know, and what I would be interested in, is what percentage of animals died on study compared to the controls, and at what dosage levels and what ages.

Expand full comment

Your argument is absurd. They died from the mRNA shots.

Expand full comment

Even the control animals? Please tell me YOUR credentials in this industry. I have had nearly four decades experience working in preclinical pharmaceutical research as a data technician. I have worked with some of the top people in the business. BUT, as I have so often found out, it's people who've never set foot in where I work, and have never read a study protocol who know ALL about what I do. That said, it is very rare that a compound would have such obvious and immediate ill effects as to require a study being terminated only after the first dose. I can recall only one, and it was a dermal (topical) study in rabbits, and no, the control group was not affected. Sometimes what looks like test article toxicity may be due to other causes, so it is very important to look at the whole picture. I have not seen any of these mRNA studies; I haven't even heard what labs did them, so I am withholding my judgement regarding them, except to say that they came to market awfully quick which makes me suspicious that testing wasn't done the way it was supposed to be.

Expand full comment

This is exactly what I suspected and is why I will not be getting any of the COVID vaccines.

We had a study at MPI Research that caused such toxicity in the animals that the study was immediately terminated. It involved a product that was already on the market but which had been reformulated. No one expected that the new formula would do what it did to the animals because, after all, the original product was out there without apparently causing any harm in humans. But they added another ingredient (one which also had been out there without causing any harm) and it seems that the combination was too toxic for the particular species being studied. One dose was all it took to kill the animals! Now, maybe it was that particular species, and maybe it would have been ok in humans, but I can tell you that everyone who was associated with that study, if you asked them if they wanted to take a chance on this new and improved product, they would have all said NO! Needless to say, it did not make it to market.

It really really concerns me that Moderna and other companies are taking shortcuts and rushing things to market; it sounds almost like they are panicking and don't want to take the time to do things right. I can name several products and I'm sure you can too that went through animal testing, were approved as safe by the FDA, and then down the road, guess what, they really weren't all that safe after all.

Expand full comment

That these trials were fraudulent should be the expected outcome given that there has never been evidence of efficacy.

https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/vrbpac-presentation-the-ultimate?s=w

Expand full comment

How many judges in the US are liberal? If they're liberal, they're jabbed. How many of them will even consider that there could be fraud and they could be headed for a lifetime of health problems because of their bad decision?

My guess is that no court will take up a Pfizer pfraud case.

Instead, there will be some sort of bland statement from the FDA/CDC that some vaxxines had some problems, but we have to be reasonable; Big Pharma did the best they could under difficult circumstances, most people did not have problems, and those who did die, well, they are casualties in our War on C0VID.

Now shut up prole and take your monthly booster.

Expand full comment

⬆️THIS⬆️

To quote you: "We are so far past screwed..."

Expand full comment

Thank you. Downloaded to read this week. This massive wave of findings and all the high level commentary and analysis from readers is astounding.

Expand full comment

You need be be more selective searching for efficacy and limit to a 28 day window with one metric and voila it works! *smirk*

https://web.archive.org/web/20200918085932/https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-announce-data-preclinical-studies-mrna

Expand full comment

True, and the FDA document that came in first FOIA release ... pg. 13/38 has the proof in the agency's own words what the coding for lack of efficacy, and what they defined as "Vaccine Failure" its all there....... https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

Expand full comment

What does this speak to but the reality of institutional rot? Individual Substack writers are doing work that the FDA, CDC, NIH, and major news organizations with hundreds of journalists haven't even begun to allow themselves to notice.

Anyway, I can't wait for the moment when a 24 year-old factchecker with a journalism degree spends thirty minutes typing up a piece ruling that questions about Pfizer's clinical trials are disinformation.

Expand full comment

"now, anyone who has ever run a clinical trial is already probably jumping up and down like this: bullshit"

I'm going to disagree here. I know a hard leftist who runs clinical drug trials for Pfizer. She was on the C0VID trials in 21. If I asked her about this... which I can't, because she can't be reasoned with, she would say that it was a worldwide health crisis and people stepped up, nothing to see here.

Or she would say that it's incredibly difficult to manage sites, especially with so many people. This is really, REALLY hard work people! REALLY DIFFICULT because of incompetent people on the ground.

If I persisted (I've tried to show her info twice, and ran into an angry, angry wall,) my guess is her next argument would be "Even if mistakes were made, it doesn't matter, because the vaxxine is the only way to save people from dying of c0vid."

She literally believes that unless you get vaxxed, you will DIE of C0VID.

Expand full comment

I've run clinical trials. It's not physically possible to do what they said they did.

Consenting people, getting their demographics, their full medical history, filling in the many standardised questionnaires, going through the patient information sheet, explaining the trial, getting their signed consent. It all takes time. You can't do it in 5 minutes.

And that's once you've found them, persuaded them to take part, and made an appointment for them to turn up.

Expand full comment

Never argue with a man/woman whose job depends on not being convinced.

Expand full comment

Even as the trap door was being sprung at Nuremberg more that one "hangee" was protesting his innocence.

Expand full comment

Only obeying orders.

Expand full comment

and every arrogant convict who still thinks they're smarter than the system.

Expand full comment

Let alone the prep and lead up to recruiting. That alone is not possible in this timeframe.

Expand full comment

Exactly.

Normal practice is that it takes 6 months to set the trial up.

The first hurdle is ethical committe approval. It takes months to write the necessary documents to present to the ethical committee. They want to see everything. Full protocol and all patient-facing documents. You can't prepare this stuff overnight.

Expand full comment
May 10, 2022·edited May 10, 2022

I don't doubt your word regarding clinical trials; however, I do think there are apologists that will rationalize anything, because "it was either vaxxination or death." They don't care if protocols were not followed, corners were cut and data was corrupted. "Vaxx or death."

That being said, perhaps there is another way to do the enrollment:

Let's say that "doctors in Argentina" got a letter/email/call from their "government" and were told "participate or else." Or simply... "you have been chosen, and you'll curry favor with the regime if you choose to participate."

Each "doctor" could have then been told they needed to enroll "X number of patients in X time. Or else."

A bit far fetched IMHO, but that is a way it could have been done. I'd say fraud was more likely.

Expand full comment

I think gato touches on this when he wrote "this site [BA] alone comprises over 10% of enrollment...in a locale famous for fraud and non-extradition."

Expand full comment

You needn’t even go as far as the location. Just look at the company….how many millions of dollars in fines have they paid? How many times? That in itself is reason enough not to trust them. Fraud and fines are just the cost of doing business. It’s not like the are going to jail or anything….😾

Expand full comment

Not millions; billions. One single criminal fine cost them $1.195 billion.

"The company paid a criminal fine of $1.195 billion. Pfizer also forfeited an additional $105 million. Bextra was withdrawn from the market in 2005.

The Justice Department also said in 2009 that Pfizer paid $1 billion to resolve allegations of civil wrongdoing under the False Claims Act that the company illegally promoted Bextra and three other drugs: the antipsychotic Geodon, the antibiotic Zyvox and the anti-epileptic drug Lyrica."

Expand full comment

👍🏻 What’s the old saying? A zebra doesn’t change its stripes? There is nothing trustworthy about these people. It’s mind boggling how anyone can’t see this.

Expand full comment

Argentina is a fascinating nation with a "colorful" history. I've never visited there, but I have visited and lived in several Latin American nations, as well as studied the language and culture. Suffice to say that Argentina, although nominally a nation primarily settled by White Europeans, has managed to combine the worst elements of traditional Latin American corruption with the same chaotic "democracy" one finds in Italy, where a lot of its population hailed from.

As such, I suspect your two scenarios are both inaccurate. It's far more likely that Dr. Martinelli (or whoever) received a discreet envelope full of (foreign) cash and was asked to write his reports a certain way. That's the way lots of business gets done in South America, as well as many other parts of the globe. Americans and some others may frown upon bribery and corruption, but to a large degree, it's an accepted part of the culture many places.

Actually, I concede you a point: It's more likely maybe that a higher level official in their Ministry of Health or whatever, received a phone call from some foreign contact, asking him to influence the trial in various ways. For his trouble he receives a deposit to one of his overseas accounts.

Yes it could have been threats and coercion, but cash and other benefits work much better.

Expand full comment

Regarding cash... very good point. I know nothing about the way things are done in Argentina or anywhere in S. America. I was just trying to stretch my imagination in terms of "well, maybe this happened." Maybe is quite different than probably. Your scenario I think is more probable.

Expand full comment

Their argument of vaxx or death will not counter fraud.

Expand full comment
May 11, 2022·edited May 11, 2022

same with my sister w/masters in nursing and Bro in law MD, interesting, they both have autoimmune diseases and so does her mother who's a nurse! (we share fathers,not mothers). They pop pills, antibiotics and I'm sure vaxx like crazy. I am 100% natural and holistic, only vaxx since childhood was dtap and I was pissed that my doc mentioned it so casually since I work with my hands a lot...I felt intermittently ill for months. Early in the scamdemic I sent sister some alternate sites opposing the narrative, she never responded, so we don't talk about it. When ppl aren't humble enough to receive truth, it's to their own peril. Ever wonder why "Jesus is the way" to Father God....you have to be humble in order to know Him and hear truth. I'm no saint, but the only way to God is thru humility which is what Jesus came to show us an example of. Not blind faith in others(they'll fail you), blind faith in the bible and what God speaks to us through it. Arrogance repels God (no amount of 'man' wisdom will trump what God will give freely to the humble)

Expand full comment

If only sincerely held beliefs would make Reality fall into line! Alas, thousands of years of field research has produced little evidence that works. But many people keep trying.

Expand full comment
May 10, 2022·edited May 10, 2022

Pro tip: don't do a web search for "penile vein thrombosis".

(It might cause some, ahem, vaccine hesitancy).

Expand full comment

Yikes. I'm going to leave that one to you brave souls.

Expand full comment

Simply being hesitant to be injected with an experimental potion with zero history of efficacy or safety, against a pathogen that was little more deadly than a common flu, and two years later more akin to the common cold, does it for me.

Expand full comment

I had a chance once to review the raw data of a pharmaceutical trial. Doing so made it clear that the entire industry was full of fraud. Anyone with an adverse reaction, including death, was held to be "unrelated to the subject medication". What was submitted for approval had been altered so many times that it barely reflected anything in the raw data.

Expand full comment

We have had evidence of fraud and malfeasance all along. Even prior to these court ordered data dumps. From the 1st release there we near equal amounts of infections in treatment vs control groups and there was increased all cause mortality. This happened even tho ALL control participants were tested and ONLY those injected that were adjudicated to need to be tested were then tested. IF they had tested ALL injected then there near certainly would have been NEGATIVE EFFECTIVENESS. THEN the Fauci Feign® which is to remove the control group - CASE CLOSED. ANY measure indicating positive efficacy and safety was dubious mathematical gymnastics and or outright concealment of factual data. Spiced with mixing Relative with Absolute reduction. NO DEMOGRAPHIC should receive these injections.

Expand full comment

I'll believe nothing until U2 play in the subway in Buenos Aire.

Expand full comment

😆 Then it's real!!

Expand full comment

And important!

Expand full comment

OMG! Funny. These zealots better watch out, Franklin Graham boosted with Moderna and landed 3 weeks later in heart surgery removing his heart sac because of pericarditis squeezing his heart! Unfortunately he's not connected any dots yet. That is arrogance. What makes ppl want to control others and STRONGLY advise them to do something? And I thought christian ppl understood this principal. You always encourage others that they are capable of thinking for themselves and keep reminding them to get still and seek God for counsel.

Expand full comment

This making pfun of their pfabrications is rather pfrivolous.

Expand full comment

" .... likely invalidate the liability protection granted under EUA ..." - that's key. Fraud vitiates contracts - long standing legal principle. Back in March, Edward Dowd (the renegade ex Blackrock analyst) seemed to be leading the charge on that; or at least, claiming that money interests on Wall St (insurance sector) were going to blow sky high on that claim and take big pharma down. I don't doubt his good intentions and veracity - but we are out almost two months from his initial claims and so far, crickets. It's damnably complex - vax liability protection, I think, rests on more than one shot EUA maneuvers - it is hard written into law for a long period - any litigation would take minimal a decade plus. And meanwhile the "next pandemic" will be on us. Well, the more chirping crickets - the more mice rummaging - the better - keep at it guys! - Thank you!

Expand full comment

Saw this yesterday on Steve Kirsch's stack. My only thought is that perhaps, because it is a military hospital that they recruited military personnel - or told them they had to do it - hence the ease of finding so many willing participants so quickly. They would all be fairly young and healthy probably too - which may skew the data - but that is another thing. All sounds a bit fishy to me.... so cats might want to get dug further in then.....

Expand full comment

Are you telling me that Big Pharma, who was heavily incentivized with billions of potential profits and no legal liability whatsoever, might have fudged the books on the trials? Well, knock me over with a feather!

Expand full comment

moderna mrna went to work for def advanced research program agency (darpa) in 2013..... it did not result in anything discoverable on the www. wondering why!

i entered the azn 2222 trial in usa in nov 2020. my intake took well over 2 hours including the doc doing the physical discovering my functional murmur and almost cutting me, the last step was the injection and 15 minute wait...... second shot in dec 2020. i learned i received the real thing in feb when i could get the shots from the state. seemed this site was doing 3 to 5 subjects in a flow, about 1 hour space.

my last blood submission will be nov 2022!

Expand full comment
author

also worth noting is that they did not, best i can tell, develop their own vaccine for covid.

they licensed it from NIH.

"where did NIH get it?"

now there is an interesting question.

i'd love to ask the same of bioNtech, the little oncology co that had never done vaccine work before a sudden massive investment from bill gates in late 2019.

Expand full comment

And China, I heard.

Expand full comment

The entire point of testing or a trial is to study on a small scale what might be too costly or dangerous to study on a large scale. This concept applies to all sorts of things: product marketing, bridge building, chemical reactors, drug testing, etc. While the details differ with each area of study there is nothing fundamentally different about trials in these various areas: Once you set up a proper test you are able to predict with some level of certainty what will happen on a large scale. Regardless of the discipline testing ALWAYS occurs. You can skip the test and watch the bridge collapse when cars finally drive on it. But, this too is a test. Just a very expensive one. From the collapsed bridge you can recover the parts, reassemble the bridge and draw some conclusions why the failure occurred. A "fudged" test might also produce a collapsed bridge and a reassembly will again reveal the cause. If you compare this work with the previously accepted but "fudged" test you have very strong evidence of testing fraud.

Vaccine testing is no different. If what you see when millions of arms have been jabbed does not correlate with the testing results then you have prima facie evidence that the testing was wrong. It could be wrong for only one of two reasons: It was poorly designed or the results were fraudulently reported (or created, same thing). If the testing protocol was sound (on paper, at least) then the only other alternative left is fraud or perhaps praud in this case.

Expand full comment

Do you know that famous and well-respected lawyer Robert Barnes who is representing Pfizer whistleblower always mentions your substack articles? This time he mentioned that it’s similar to his whistleblower claims. I just hope and pray your discoveries will help with their lawsuit!

Expand full comment

I worked my entire adult life as a medical clinic administrator with some exposure to clinical trials. From the get-go this whole vax scene seemed extremely suspicious, rushed and non-transparent. Thanks you for an amazing and very interesting piece!

Expand full comment