I’ve actually never tried to create a Substack account.
Anyone can find dozens of interviews by using search engines other than the fully captured ones like Google and Safari.
Use those & you get ten pages of Reuters smear pieces.
Try Yandex, Brave and you get a different picture. Which in itself is interesting, no?
I’ve definitely had disappearing post syndrome everywhere. I guess it depends on whether I’m controversial enough in a given moment to bother to actively censor. Very often, comments are deleted as I watch, unusually under YT videos. On Twitter I’m not even under my own name & using a VPN. I’m pretty sure many tweets can’t be liked or replied to.
In retrospect, I was perhaps the most serious threat to the U.K. arm of the plandemic crime during 2020. Now, I’m kryptonite to any authority because the number of crimes is so large that I can point them out convincingly using reason and science & to be irrefutable. So my reach has to be minimised.
If they weren’t able to do this technically, they’d have had to intern, abduct of murder me, so I suppose I should be grateful that they’re very good at what they do.
I’m not in the least frightened by the perpetrators. It’s not personal, them to me, the way it is vice versa.
I often say to doctors, if you’re scared of speaking out, just listen to what’s going to happen to you and your children if you don’t.
I just read your Off-Guardian piece linked above. The last paragraph -- and your point about the "asymmetry of risk" -- is spot-on, and should be chilling to anyone who is still "on the fence."
If you listen to the mainstream narrative, and you/they are wrong, you lose your life at best. At worst, you have purchased a subscription to a living hell of tyranny and iatrogenic illness.
If you listen to the "conspiracy theorists," and you are wrong, you will be looked at askance at best. At worst, you will be openly laughed at by your peers.
Unfortunately, the threat of public ridicule is a fate worse than death to many. For some individuals, it is their own version of hell. That social conditioning, I believe, is truly what we're up against -- demonic be damned; we're fighting basic Human biology. (Eek!)
For sure and I like that line of thinking! ;) However ... Therein begs the question.
I've had this conversation with a number of people, largely offline, and we simply cannot figure out WHY the WEF crowd does not seem to see that. Are they truly that stupid and blind? ... Why would they enact a plan that is guaranteed to leave behind those who are most likely to oppose them?
Your first point is very valid on the surface, but ... I think that perhaps that view is a bit on the negative side (though I wholly appreciate where it comes from). I think it also depends on what you are really hoping to accomplish, and on what level.
In my mind, my very existence is in opposition to their goals. I have a medical doctorate and have not taken the vaxx. Although I am far less vocal than you are about it, I do gladly and readily tell anyone I encounter what I know from my research (beginning in 2021 with the brilliant summary by Doc Spartacus). I'm not shy about discussing the vaxx with people, and I'm able to do so without alienating them.
I can see that you're across the pond ... Over here, we have a phrase, which is probably more legend than fact: Three percent. This refers to the supposed fact that only 3% of the American colonists actually bothered to stand up to British rule, thus sparking the revolution and founding the USA. Again, it's probably totally bogus and certainly whitewashed in the extreme, but it's a worthwhile rallying cry. Another way to look at the same concept might be the 80/20 rule. Sure, 80% of the population are blithering sheep, but they only cause 20% of the problems for the WEF crowd. The 20% who are not sheep give them 80% of the grief. In this case, it might even be 90/10 or above ... That's enough to keep me motivated ;)
As to subsequent plans ... I don't know. Nuclear disaster would not create a fun paradise for the WEF ghouls to live out their days, nor would any other non-voluntary dystopia. I think that they WANT you (us) to believe that their rule is inevitable, so that you (we) will CHOOSE their oppression.
It's all about choice ... Obviously my post is skeeving off SOMETHING in the algorithm, because it keeps giving me an error message. Hmm!
I don’t think their rule is inevitable, though I think it’s reasonable to believe nobody plans to take over the world without a plan they’re pretty sure will succeed.
AI may turn out not to be the easy fix they seem to think, for real time decisions on CBDC. If it isn’t instantaneous, it’s no use.
Regrettably I do think what’s inevitable is the demolition of modern life. They’re well on their way and no hint of effective opposition from the street or elsewhere.
Aah, yeah. It won't "Go back to Normal," that's for sure. I think the big questions are: How bad is it going to get, WHY is it going to get that bad, and how long is it going to last that way?
CBDC sure does seem inevitable. I don't think that's going to go over very well with a lot of us ... That might be The Big One, in a Biblical sense (the mark referred to in Revelation, which so many seem to think is the shot -- I don't think it's that, but I do think that part of the prophecy is going to come along soon). Probably not, since it seems to obvious, but that's my current working hypothesis.
The AI angle fascinates me. I used to enjoy chatting with the super rudimentary chatbot programs that existed when I was a kid, trying to see if Elisa and Dr. Sbatso had any spark of consciousness. I have weird theories about that, but they are truly weird. Probably need to save that for a personal 'blog post.
Thank you for clarifying and thank you for your courage.
For a full year, I have considered The Covid Lies (37 page PDF) the Definitive Mike Yeadon written statement. (There's really not a whole lot more to be said, until maybe the "next Pandemic" which Dr Faucci apparently has just hinted may be right on time for election year 2024).
Thanks. I’ve to add another: that there was never even a release of a novel respiratory pathogen. Of course! Why break a winning streak. 100% lies. Well done, perpetrators.
I’ve actually never tried to create a Substack account.
Anyone can find dozens of interviews by using search engines other than the fully captured ones like Google and Safari.
Use those & you get ten pages of Reuters smear pieces.
Try Yandex, Brave and you get a different picture. Which in itself is interesting, no?
I’ve definitely had disappearing post syndrome everywhere. I guess it depends on whether I’m controversial enough in a given moment to bother to actively censor. Very often, comments are deleted as I watch, unusually under YT videos. On Twitter I’m not even under my own name & using a VPN. I’m pretty sure many tweets can’t be liked or replied to.
In retrospect, I was perhaps the most serious threat to the U.K. arm of the plandemic crime during 2020. Now, I’m kryptonite to any authority because the number of crimes is so large that I can point them out convincingly using reason and science & to be irrefutable. So my reach has to be minimised.
If they weren’t able to do this technically, they’d have had to intern, abduct of murder me, so I suppose I should be grateful that they’re very good at what they do.
I’m not in the least frightened by the perpetrators. It’s not personal, them to me, the way it is vice versa.
I often say to doctors, if you’re scared of speaking out, just listen to what’s going to happen to you and your children if you don’t.
I just read your Off-Guardian piece linked above. The last paragraph -- and your point about the "asymmetry of risk" -- is spot-on, and should be chilling to anyone who is still "on the fence."
If you listen to the mainstream narrative, and you/they are wrong, you lose your life at best. At worst, you have purchased a subscription to a living hell of tyranny and iatrogenic illness.
If you listen to the "conspiracy theorists," and you are wrong, you will be looked at askance at best. At worst, you will be openly laughed at by your peers.
Unfortunately, the threat of public ridicule is a fate worse than death to many. For some individuals, it is their own version of hell. That social conditioning, I believe, is truly what we're up against -- demonic be damned; we're fighting basic Human biology. (Eek!)
Yes, and human biology is often such that, as one psychologist told me, “People would prefer to die with the herd than to leave the herd”.
That leaves as potential survivors only those who don’t follow herds!
For sure and I like that line of thinking! ;) However ... Therein begs the question.
I've had this conversation with a number of people, largely offline, and we simply cannot figure out WHY the WEF crowd does not seem to see that. Are they truly that stupid and blind? ... Why would they enact a plan that is guaranteed to leave behind those who are most likely to oppose them?
1. I’m not sure how effective we’ve really been at “opposing them”. I don’t claim I’ve even slowed them down, sadly
2. They don’t care who goes first as they believe their subsequent plans will take out most of the rest?
Your first point is very valid on the surface, but ... I think that perhaps that view is a bit on the negative side (though I wholly appreciate where it comes from). I think it also depends on what you are really hoping to accomplish, and on what level.
In my mind, my very existence is in opposition to their goals. I have a medical doctorate and have not taken the vaxx. Although I am far less vocal than you are about it, I do gladly and readily tell anyone I encounter what I know from my research (beginning in 2021 with the brilliant summary by Doc Spartacus). I'm not shy about discussing the vaxx with people, and I'm able to do so without alienating them.
I can see that you're across the pond ... Over here, we have a phrase, which is probably more legend than fact: Three percent. This refers to the supposed fact that only 3% of the American colonists actually bothered to stand up to British rule, thus sparking the revolution and founding the USA. Again, it's probably totally bogus and certainly whitewashed in the extreme, but it's a worthwhile rallying cry. Another way to look at the same concept might be the 80/20 rule. Sure, 80% of the population are blithering sheep, but they only cause 20% of the problems for the WEF crowd. The 20% who are not sheep give them 80% of the grief. In this case, it might even be 90/10 or above ... That's enough to keep me motivated ;)
As to subsequent plans ... I don't know. Nuclear disaster would not create a fun paradise for the WEF ghouls to live out their days, nor would any other non-voluntary dystopia. I think that they WANT you (us) to believe that their rule is inevitable, so that you (we) will CHOOSE their oppression.
It's all about choice ... Obviously my post is skeeving off SOMETHING in the algorithm, because it keeps giving me an error message. Hmm!
I don’t think their rule is inevitable, though I think it’s reasonable to believe nobody plans to take over the world without a plan they’re pretty sure will succeed.
AI may turn out not to be the easy fix they seem to think, for real time decisions on CBDC. If it isn’t instantaneous, it’s no use.
Regrettably I do think what’s inevitable is the demolition of modern life. They’re well on their way and no hint of effective opposition from the street or elsewhere.
Aah, yeah. It won't "Go back to Normal," that's for sure. I think the big questions are: How bad is it going to get, WHY is it going to get that bad, and how long is it going to last that way?
CBDC sure does seem inevitable. I don't think that's going to go over very well with a lot of us ... That might be The Big One, in a Biblical sense (the mark referred to in Revelation, which so many seem to think is the shot -- I don't think it's that, but I do think that part of the prophecy is going to come along soon). Probably not, since it seems to obvious, but that's my current working hypothesis.
The AI angle fascinates me. I used to enjoy chatting with the super rudimentary chatbot programs that existed when I was a kid, trying to see if Elisa and Dr. Sbatso had any spark of consciousness. I have weird theories about that, but they are truly weird. Probably need to save that for a personal 'blog post.
Thank you for clarifying and thank you for your courage.
For a full year, I have considered The Covid Lies (37 page PDF) the Definitive Mike Yeadon written statement. (There's really not a whole lot more to be said, until maybe the "next Pandemic" which Dr Faucci apparently has just hinted may be right on time for election year 2024).
https://doctors4covidethics.org/the-covid-lies/
(duckduckgo actually put that on top of the helpful slew of fact checkers!)
And, of course, I always keep a hard copy readily available - a samizdat fall back strategy should be part of any prepper's repertoire.
Thanks. I’ve to add another: that there was never even a release of a novel respiratory pathogen. Of course! Why break a winning streak. 100% lies. Well done, perpetrators.