Well, it sounds thrilling and hopeful, everything you urge.
But find me a roomful--even a small uncomfortable roomful--of people who aren't in one way or another secret or overt authoritarians. It's just they don't want "them guys" telling them what to do. They want to be the ones telling "them guys" what to do.
This is a natural human impulse. Fighting it is hard. Always has been. Every dissident group ever, that ran away from the authoritarians of their times and places to make brave new free worlds, just recreated the patterns.
Yeah--Elon. A guy who makes EVs and is devoted to space exploration and depends for his various nefarious products reliable access to very bad actors was never gonna be a friend of freedom.
Everyone here: how much freedom do you really want people you hate to have?
There's a lot of talk on Substack these days about the sad sorry state of education in the US and how that might be rectified.
I got a plan. Teach kids to be competent at reading, writing and arithmetic. For subject matter work, say, history and civics: present extracts to the class from a quality conservative historian and a quality liberal historian, and have them read, think about and discuss each perspective and what they think is a correct interpretation and an incorrect one, and why. Do that for science too. Give the kids an overview of how "scientific truth" has changed over the centuries and why it will of course continue to do so.
How many people really truly have the stones to let kids examine both or many sides of everything? Or they really just want the kids taught *their* side?
Aha! You want them to THINK! Not just turn into a bunch of happy little blank-fillers!
Alas, that train last left the station in the 1970s, and then the station was taken over by filth and rats and eventually bulldozed. Now nobody even remembers what used to be there... there was a sign once, but it was graffiti'd so bad that even that was ignominiously and unceremoniously removed.
It's hard to find a group of even two where one does not want to tell the other what to do, think, or be. Just attend a PTA or HOA board meeting, if you don't believe it. A bunch of wanna-be tyrants. And they are your friends and neighbors...
The only way Gato's plan works is for it to evolve organically, without a center or a plan or a manager. Such an evolution is inefficient (because it goes down so many blind alleys) but it is more likely to produce an egalitarian result than any sort of managed program. I'd argue that it is already underway but we just can't see it, which is an inevitable consequence of such a beast -- you can't describe it, you can't define it, you would not recognize it if you saw it. But one day it will just seem to be there, and it will almost be as if it were always there. Because in a way, it always was.
It might not surprise you that in my brief volunteer term on a city council (they call this place a city but...) advisory committee, I was the sole representative of the peasants' rebellion and I rebelled so much they were perpetually troubled about my--uh--tone. These types I know over-well.
I do like your last paragraph here. We should always remember what those weeds do to concrete, eventually. Even as a kid, I loved seeing it.
Doesn't surprise me at all. And after you've lived in a place like NYC, the word 'city' takes on a special meaning that no little burg of ten or twenty thousand can hope to match. They can call it 'the City of Newtown' or whatever they want... it is still a crossroad to those whose experience of a city is something more profound.
Detroit after the riots of 1967 went through a 'weed renaissance' as you might call it. At the time (before the riots) Detroit was the 4th most populous and one of the richest cities in the USA. The Motor City -- home of American manufacturing know-how. Whole blocks were deserted, the population cratered and will likely never come back. Nature abhors a vacuum, something will fill it. Ragweed lives almost everywhere.
I have a hard time with the word 'allowed' in this context. Events like riots are not planned; they have a life of their own. Even if someone starts them intentionally, like the Antifa 'summer of love' in 2020, how it plays out can rarely be foretold. You can light the fire, but you cannot control the wind.
This is true. Or perhaps partially true. There's a type of person who imagines himself to be a leader but is really just an instigator of chaos. That person does indeed light the match and really gets off on the thrill of the spark. There's always a moment of choice--"which way do I push them?"
And they will never accept responsibility for it, or even feel regret for it.
During the 68 riot in Detroit, the radio played the Doors "Baby won't you light my fire" about every ten minutes. The riot was not just allowed, but promoted.
Have you tried Gab? That's basically them in a nutshell.
As a free-speech-ist I do feel like wanting to find some middle ground, where people can create whatever they want (that is legal) yet not have unwanted things shoved in front of you... perhaps the concept of "consent" can be extended to sexual content in general, so that you have to get an informed "ok" first before posting porn to someone? (But drawing the line between 'sexy models' to 'porn' will be hard...)
Yes, Gab has a very much "no porn, no exceptions" policy, but anything other than that is pretty much "anything you like so long as it is legal, and if people don't like it it's on them to block you".
I think I used Gettr and Gab a little but never too much. I like the general "community" (Lol) I am following on Twitter and too lazy to start over.
Yes, now that you say it we should be able to opt in or out of pornagraphic material as part of our account settings and any user posting porn should have a special setting allowing it. Then, violators get dumped. The pretty girls (porn in clothing) are annoying but much more tolerable to the crazy stuff I have accidentally seen on Twitter. I didn't even know people did those things! Images burned in my brain and forever traumatized!
Substack is privately owned and is not a protocol. Nor is it peer to peer. But those peer to peer networks are often hard for non-tech people to figure out. For those of us who grew up in IRC, it brings back the halcyon days of text chat without the dumbass ads.
I see this place as a nice big allowed-to-run-wild back yard with lots of tables and lawn chairs. Eventually we all figure out who we want to sit down with and kibitz, and who don't necessarily suit our temperaments. But there's enough room for everyone.
Just visited home page of matrix. I’m 50-50 about how easy it might be to use, I may check it out for real. Thanks for posting!
A consideration that I rarely find in discussions about technology use, is the application of a multi-generational approach. We currently have a wide disparity between younger generation who has never know life without software, laptops, servers, personal devices of one sort or another; and the older generations who used dial-up telephones with party lines, recall the advent of teletype and fax machines, may or may not have adopted personal computers as soon as they were affordable, entered DOS commands to execute functions(thereby risking wiping out company hard drives, as yours truly did early on)...etc.
I am eager to witness a “decentralized information infrastructure”... I can tell you far too many in my world will just be overwhelmed.
I anticipate AI scraping this platform, and shutting down contrary content, maybe it’s already happening. 🤷♀️ Does anyone know if the brains behind this operation put safeguards in place?
Husband has an instance running, not federated with other matrix servers, but getting friends (even tech aware ones) to connect to our server requires that they do some black magic incantation. The wife acceptance factor of the "create account" process is low. 🤣
But it's mostly just chitchat as text. You can upload files, images, etc.
Offspring doesn't know how to use the basic phone app (I assume) because he defaults to secure calls over our server.
It ain't no joke I'd like to be Empress of the Universe. Remember what I said about finding any non-authoritarian types? I'm as impure as any. The thing is, I recognize my tendencies.
Twitter is supposed to be the place of free speech and your point has little to do with what's now going to happen at twitter as the authoritarians start to find other more subtle ways to censor opinions.
Talking about inherent human nature is a completely different subject.
Here! I'm willing to let you speak your mind about anything you like. Just be aware that incompatible concepts is a thing and I reserve my right to tune you out or, if you are attempting to appeal to my baser instincts, altogether block you.
Authority chains are necessary. Its just the question of which and how large. The gargantuan psychopathic , parasitic and bureaucratic states of Present times aren't it
What kind of cat hangs out in your house? HOUSE CAT!
What kind of cat hangs out in the alley? ALLEY CAT!
What kind of cat is a chocolate candy bar? KIT KAT!
What kind of cat are you? What kind of cat are you?
Tell me tell me true, what kind of cat are you?
I'll give you some clues. What kind of cat are you?
What kind of cat has the first name of Tom? TOM CAT!
What kind of cat is really really scared? SCAREDY-CAT!
What kind of cat hangs out at the copy shop? COPYCAT!
What kind of cat is actually a fish? CATFISH!
What kind of cat breaks into places at night? CAT BURGLAR!
What kind of cat hangs out with Bat Man? CAT WOMAN!
What kind of cat has a thousand legs? CATERPILLAR!
What kind of cat is a big expensive car? CADILLAC!
What kind of cat is a great big disaster? CATASTROPHE!
What kind of cat is an even bigger disaster? CATACLYSM!
What kind of cat rhymes with that and is a long religious recitation?
CATECHISM!
What kind of cat is connected to the engine of your car?
CATALYTIC CONVERTER!
What kind of cat facilitates a chemical reaction? CATALYST!
What kind of cat comes in the mail from Sears? CATALOGUE!
What kind of cat is a group of things that are similar? CATEGORY!
What kind of cat is a whole bunch of cows? CATTLE!
What kind of cat throws stuff over the wall of a castle? CATAPULT!
What kind of cat tunnels under the castle? CATACOMB!
What kind of cat floats on two pontoons? CATAMARAN!
What kind of cat takes a picture of the inside of your body? CAT SCAN!
What kind of cat obscures your vision? CATARACT!
What kind of cat is being followed by a moon shadow? CAT STEVENS!
What kind of cat is the capital of Nepal? KATMANDU!
What kind of cat carries your golf clubs? CADDY!
--------------
Regarding free speech and censorship, at the risk of sounding like a broken record:
Give up your free speech at your peril. Once they are able to silence you, the game is over. The loss of all of your other freedoms will follow immediately after. Anyone that advocates to censor you, or to unmask your anonymity is your adversary. Treat them like one - no matter what else they say.
---
Why is it so vital and necessary for the combined monolithic apparatus of government, corporations, and NGOs, to brute force censor everyone while decimating the careers and reputations of the dissenters? Here is why:
The reason the First Amendment is prime directive order 1, is because it is the most important freedom we have for the same reason it is the first target an adversary subverts, disrupts, and destroys during a crime, a war, or a takeover—preventing a target from assembling, communicating, and organizing a response to an assault grants an enormous advantage to the aggressors.
This is and has been occurring all across the globe since the minute this COVID-19 fraud was propagated to every corner of the earth.
The Second Amendment is second because it is the remedy for anyone trying to subvert the First.
While I fully understand why you may think property ownership is more important than free speech--You do not actually have rights that involve land property. If you do not believe me void paying your land taxes for ten years. This may interest you: https://bitchute.com/video/D3SzbLyk0SAV [23 mins]
You are not wrong. Property rights would be equal to speech in the enlightenment model. They are not because not having ownership over the land is the ultimate source of slavery the only defense of which is speaking out against such tyranny (speech).
Tell more more, about why this matters to you, please.
I said elon will make it worse. My prediction was that he will force everyone to verify their identity and then with this profile you can say whatever you want. If you dare. But shadowbanning also works...
Yes, probably, oh... fall 2024. Just like Glenn Beck got taken off CNN in 2008, just before Obama's first selection. And from FOX in 2012, before the 2nd. And like Sun News Canada was shut down in 2015 before Trudope's selection... the truth can be inconvenient at times, especially when you are a wanna-be dictator.
While I don’t disagree with much of what you say, these are I think relevant points, admittedly, my opinions:
1) Elon has realized he has bitten off more than he can chew. While I was there the censorship never went away, my posts got buried and remained unseen. He was not able to control it.
2) Yaccarino was a desperate effort to fix the losing profitability battle. Poor judgment yes, but it wasn’t because he liked her WEF ties or whatever censorship she may have been involved in.
3) I see only minor differences here, except here it’s likely all profitability. If I criticize a user, however justifiably and that user is making them money, my criticism shall not be seen.
Basically the premise becomes, you can say what you like unless people notice.
As far as changing the circumstances, yuh, that’ll be as easy as was the American Revolution.
I seem to recall Elon himself musing publicly about what kind of person would be foolish enough to take the CEO job. I think he had to take what he could get.
I remember that too. Funny thing about people. Some think they’re not necessarily responsible for outcomes to things they’ve done or will do. Elon belongs to a second group that recognizes responsibility.
Globalists and the usual corporate types are in the first group.
In the first place we can learn quite a bit from our brothers and sisters in totalitarian states like China who developed their language online to evade censorship. And who in times prior to the net used fable and story to speak truth to power. In the second place, frankly, for 30 years I have championed from BBS to the WWW political organizing and free speech used to create a new community. A fascinating What If to be sure, what if the energy and enthusiasm from 1963-1980 had been able to be harnessed online? It hasn't. It won't. An incessant babbling about brutality but no direct actions, simply hands on keyboards reporting on the Home Front Casualties caused by the Civil Defense Community-CDC-will. And nothing changes. Tweedle Dumb holds power until pried from the hands of Democrats. Tweedle Dee will be just as bad. And the beat goes on:
i fear that such "coded speech" will fail in the face of AI and self learning large language models. the censorship wars are about to get hopelessly more complex with suppression, subversion, tinsel, gaslighting, thematic burying, and "agree and extend to absurdity" operations to discredit taking place so fast it will be hard to discern what is real.
the only solution here will be a verified reputation economy. everything else is going to become static.
I know that you're not a huge fan of bitcoin, but those many of those folks are very serious about privacy and freedom. And they're good at tech. Please take a look at Nostr
A.I. is not really needed though of course deployed. I am sure China uses A.I but as you see speech is more than hammering a nail.
I personally favor plain speech in political discourse and direction action is speech. During the bombing of El Salvador Americans resisting this war did alter billboards to present US planes bombing. There many other examples of speech modifying billboards. We have to resist. Open discourse is best. Speaking the truth to shame the devil's disciples. The devil does not care.
So if A.I. did not it is a routed to human eyeballs in Torrance, CA at the PLA Knowledge Intercept site where for about 1/3d of 2022 minimum wage cadre can come to California for a job and settle in barracks and then in LA.
Long before the Web, there was Usenet. The agora was the set of "news groups". They were collections of text email messages posted to the groups. Anyone could start a new group, and anyone could read it. The communication protocol was UUCP (Unix to Unix Copy). Communication was entirely decentralized: A computer would contact one or more other computers (over dial-up modems) periodically and transfer the new messages, and thus the messages were spread. Anyone could add their computers to Usenet. The owner of each computer would decide which outside computers it would share data with, and which groups it would share. Each computer held the entire database of messages - the net was quite small then. In time, the system became bogged down by spam messages.
Some time after the Web was born, Google took over the Usenet groups, put them under centralized control, and renamed them "Google Groups". They may still exist, but I'm not sure.
Something like a modern version of the original Usenet is, I think, what would work.
I'm sure we could do a better version today. The problem I see is connectivity. Denial of service is happening to people, so what do you do if you can't find an ISP or they all have terms of service that forbid you from using your computer as a server or a node on this new network?
My knowledge of networks is at the chipped stone tool level, so I don't know anything about this, but maybe someone is looking for a way out of censorship hell.
What I observe is censorship had already succeeded in programming people to self-censor. I participate on a religious forum that leans progressive. The comments reveal an unshakable tribalism.
Recently a contributor argued that economic circumstances and outcomes proved the only viable vote was for Democrats. I responded that evidence showed it might be better to not support either major political party, and I shared the history of recent bipartisan government policies that bailed out corporate cronies, caused inflation and hurt the lower class.
The response to what I wrote was that I was completely wrong. Republicans were evil and Democrats were righteous. With such people truth has no value. What their tribe believes is the truth and that is what guides every thought and decision.
Come on everybody...think of Elon's big love..neurolink....he wants what's left of our brains...I believe he is a frontman for wef...he's having fun at our expense...
Great writing, as usual. In fact you are one of the best writers out there. And I have a feeling it's not what you trained in (for lack of a better word). Matt Taibbi and some of the other reporters are good at their job, doing what journalists should do. Maybe that's why they aren't memorable or moving stylists. Despite Taibbi's obsession with Hunter Thompson, he can't seem to access that state which turns prose into poetry. But this is the fourth of fifth essay of yours I've read that forces me to stop and inhale deeply, because it is somehow absurd for a 57 year old man to be brought to tears by an internet post, and I like to think I'm more dignified than that. But you are good. Your ability to invoke that "god damn fuckin' right!" feeling in your readers is invaluable. Even if this whole project is doomed it's still the only option, the only project worth anything.
Is a private employer allowed to demand I do not hold and express opinions contrary to company policy, in my own time on my own dime, under penalty of termination of employment?
If yes, then my freedom of speech/reach does not exist.
If no, who's going to enforce this right of mine over the power of the company?
If I'm sitting at a café, am I allowed to quietly read a book or paper that the management finds offensive?
If I want to print and publish a book, is the printer allowed to refuse based on content?
I could spend all night thinking up questions like these, where the censor is a private entity.
I think you need to study 19th century history real good, Gato. This isn't a new issue, just new tech.
Dearest Gato and GatoFollowers - Time to look at Nostr! It's decentralized and messages are sent along relays. There are clients (that are similar to Twitter, Instagram, etc) and you can keep your audience across the different clients.
It was clear when the mElon hired ardent communist Linda Yaccarino as ceo of Twitter that there would only be more and more censorship. I told him then that he had nothing worth paying him for. I see no reason to participate in my own enslavement. Substack is sub par for audience size but is providing freedom to publish. Even quite foul mouthed people who espouse ideas that would get them banned from the X-rated Twitter are free to post here on Substack.
Even when Elon was running Twitter by himself, he tweeted that "Freedom of speech does not equal freedom of reach", stating that shadow banning would continue. He unbanned some people, but continued to ban others like Alex Jones. He allows NAFO trolls to brigade people. He banned a Substack writer I follow, and banned tweets that link to Substack. It's extremely disappointing.
I anticipated my “permanent” ejection from the Twitterverse overruled the moment free speech was carried through the entry door within a kitchen sink. But mysteriously denial of repatriation continues. Anyone else experience issues at the turnstile of societal participation? Have your shoes been sniffed there at?
Well, it sounds thrilling and hopeful, everything you urge.
But find me a roomful--even a small uncomfortable roomful--of people who aren't in one way or another secret or overt authoritarians. It's just they don't want "them guys" telling them what to do. They want to be the ones telling "them guys" what to do.
This is a natural human impulse. Fighting it is hard. Always has been. Every dissident group ever, that ran away from the authoritarians of their times and places to make brave new free worlds, just recreated the patterns.
Yeah--Elon. A guy who makes EVs and is devoted to space exploration and depends for his various nefarious products reliable access to very bad actors was never gonna be a friend of freedom.
Everyone here: how much freedom do you really want people you hate to have?
There's a lot of talk on Substack these days about the sad sorry state of education in the US and how that might be rectified.
I got a plan. Teach kids to be competent at reading, writing and arithmetic. For subject matter work, say, history and civics: present extracts to the class from a quality conservative historian and a quality liberal historian, and have them read, think about and discuss each perspective and what they think is a correct interpretation and an incorrect one, and why. Do that for science too. Give the kids an overview of how "scientific truth" has changed over the centuries and why it will of course continue to do so.
How many people really truly have the stones to let kids examine both or many sides of everything? Or they really just want the kids taught *their* side?
Let me know.
Aha! You want them to THINK! Not just turn into a bunch of happy little blank-fillers!
Alas, that train last left the station in the 1970s, and then the station was taken over by filth and rats and eventually bulldozed. Now nobody even remembers what used to be there... there was a sign once, but it was graffiti'd so bad that even that was ignominiously and unceremoniously removed.
It's hard to find a group of even two where one does not want to tell the other what to do, think, or be. Just attend a PTA or HOA board meeting, if you don't believe it. A bunch of wanna-be tyrants. And they are your friends and neighbors...
The only way Gato's plan works is for it to evolve organically, without a center or a plan or a manager. Such an evolution is inefficient (because it goes down so many blind alleys) but it is more likely to produce an egalitarian result than any sort of managed program. I'd argue that it is already underway but we just can't see it, which is an inevitable consequence of such a beast -- you can't describe it, you can't define it, you would not recognize it if you saw it. But one day it will just seem to be there, and it will almost be as if it were always there. Because in a way, it always was.
It might not surprise you that in my brief volunteer term on a city council (they call this place a city but...) advisory committee, I was the sole representative of the peasants' rebellion and I rebelled so much they were perpetually troubled about my--uh--tone. These types I know over-well.
I do like your last paragraph here. We should always remember what those weeds do to concrete, eventually. Even as a kid, I loved seeing it.
Doesn't surprise me at all. And after you've lived in a place like NYC, the word 'city' takes on a special meaning that no little burg of ten or twenty thousand can hope to match. They can call it 'the City of Newtown' or whatever they want... it is still a crossroad to those whose experience of a city is something more profound.
Detroit after the riots of 1967 went through a 'weed renaissance' as you might call it. At the time (before the riots) Detroit was the 4th most populous and one of the richest cities in the USA. The Motor City -- home of American manufacturing know-how. Whole blocks were deserted, the population cratered and will likely never come back. Nature abhors a vacuum, something will fill it. Ragweed lives almost everywhere.
One may hope that the people who allowed the rotting of excellent well-designed housing stock are roasting forever in God's big tandoor in the sky.
I have a hard time with the word 'allowed' in this context. Events like riots are not planned; they have a life of their own. Even if someone starts them intentionally, like the Antifa 'summer of love' in 2020, how it plays out can rarely be foretold. You can light the fire, but you cannot control the wind.
This is true. Or perhaps partially true. There's a type of person who imagines himself to be a leader but is really just an instigator of chaos. That person does indeed light the match and really gets off on the thrill of the spark. There's always a moment of choice--"which way do I push them?"
And they will never accept responsibility for it, or even feel regret for it.
During the 68 riot in Detroit, the radio played the Doors "Baby won't you light my fire" about every ten minutes. The riot was not just allowed, but promoted.
Poetic, WB.
The network already exists IRL.
I’m surprised at the number of people I meet (both red and blue states) against authoritarian control. They don’t want any part of it.
To see it requires engaging without agenda or cynicism, not always easy to hold at bay.
George Washington was one of the only ones who walked away.
Can we pro free speech and anti porn at same time? I'm sick of accidentally running into porn on Twitter.
If the porn is produced by criminal means (trafficking, child rape and exploitation), sure.
If it's just skeevy disgusting crap produced by freely-able-to-consent adults, we gotta just avert our eyes and move on.
Have you tried Gab? That's basically them in a nutshell.
As a free-speech-ist I do feel like wanting to find some middle ground, where people can create whatever they want (that is legal) yet not have unwanted things shoved in front of you... perhaps the concept of "consent" can be extended to sexual content in general, so that you have to get an informed "ok" first before posting porn to someone? (But drawing the line between 'sexy models' to 'porn' will be hard...)
Is Gab more strict on porn then? If so maybe I should consider transitioning.
Yes, Gab has a very much "no porn, no exceptions" policy, but anything other than that is pretty much "anything you like so long as it is legal, and if people don't like it it's on them to block you".
I think I used Gettr and Gab a little but never too much. I like the general "community" (Lol) I am following on Twitter and too lazy to start over.
Yes, now that you say it we should be able to opt in or out of pornagraphic material as part of our account settings and any user posting porn should have a special setting allowing it. Then, violators get dumped. The pretty girls (porn in clothing) are annoying but much more tolerable to the crazy stuff I have accidentally seen on Twitter. I didn't even know people did those things! Images burned in my brain and forever traumatized!
Matrix.org is open source and freely available. You might find rooms/spaces of desirable people there.
I found my desirable people right here on Substack. Cup just about runneth over.
❤️❤️❤️
Substack is privately owned and is not a protocol. Nor is it peer to peer. But those peer to peer networks are often hard for non-tech people to figure out. For those of us who grew up in IRC, it brings back the halcyon days of text chat without the dumbass ads.
I see this place as a nice big allowed-to-run-wild back yard with lots of tables and lawn chairs. Eventually we all figure out who we want to sit down with and kibitz, and who don't necessarily suit our temperaments. But there's enough room for everyone.
But substack activity is dependent on an owner. It would not be hard (for tptb) to turn off the internet to substack and debank the owner.
And Elon bans linking to Substack in tweets.
Oho. Everybody else is here too, and ships are unloading huddled masses
Just visited home page of matrix. I’m 50-50 about how easy it might be to use, I may check it out for real. Thanks for posting!
A consideration that I rarely find in discussions about technology use, is the application of a multi-generational approach. We currently have a wide disparity between younger generation who has never know life without software, laptops, servers, personal devices of one sort or another; and the older generations who used dial-up telephones with party lines, recall the advent of teletype and fax machines, may or may not have adopted personal computers as soon as they were affordable, entered DOS commands to execute functions(thereby risking wiping out company hard drives, as yours truly did early on)...etc.
I am eager to witness a “decentralized information infrastructure”... I can tell you far too many in my world will just be overwhelmed.
I anticipate AI scraping this platform, and shutting down contrary content, maybe it’s already happening. 🤷♀️ Does anyone know if the brains behind this operation put safeguards in place?
Matrix is easy if you stay on its main servers.
Husband has an instance running, not federated with other matrix servers, but getting friends (even tech aware ones) to connect to our server requires that they do some black magic incantation. The wife acceptance factor of the "create account" process is low. 🤣
But it's mostly just chitchat as text. You can upload files, images, etc.
Offspring doesn't know how to use the basic phone app (I assume) because he defaults to secure calls over our server.
How many people really truly have the stones to let kids examine both or many sides of everything?
-----------
This is the only way to be confident in your knowledge.
One of the things I'm most proud of as a mother was telling my kid nobody has the right to tell anyone what to believe. It must be felt from inside.
And my guess is you've never even once considered running for office.
It ain't no joke I'd like to be Empress of the Universe. Remember what I said about finding any non-authoritarian types? I'm as impure as any. The thing is, I recognize my tendencies.
You're missing the point of this piece.
Twitter is supposed to be the place of free speech and your point has little to do with what's now going to happen at twitter as the authoritarians start to find other more subtle ways to censor opinions.
Talking about inherent human nature is a completely different subject.
"You're missing the point of this piece."
Am I?
Here! I'm willing to let you speak your mind about anything you like. Just be aware that incompatible concepts is a thing and I reserve my right to tune you out or, if you are attempting to appeal to my baser instincts, altogether block you.
Authority chains are necessary. Its just the question of which and how large. The gargantuan psychopathic , parasitic and bureaucratic states of Present times aren't it
Found your anthem el gato malo (disregard if you've seen this before):
https://youtu.be/W1N-V4mqV3k
Billy Jonas--What Kind of Cat Are You?
What kind of cat hangs out in your house? HOUSE CAT!
What kind of cat hangs out in the alley? ALLEY CAT!
What kind of cat is a chocolate candy bar? KIT KAT!
What kind of cat are you? What kind of cat are you?
Tell me tell me true, what kind of cat are you?
I'll give you some clues. What kind of cat are you?
What kind of cat has the first name of Tom? TOM CAT!
What kind of cat is really really scared? SCAREDY-CAT!
What kind of cat hangs out at the copy shop? COPYCAT!
What kind of cat is actually a fish? CATFISH!
What kind of cat breaks into places at night? CAT BURGLAR!
What kind of cat hangs out with Bat Man? CAT WOMAN!
What kind of cat has a thousand legs? CATERPILLAR!
What kind of cat is a big expensive car? CADILLAC!
What kind of cat is a great big disaster? CATASTROPHE!
What kind of cat is an even bigger disaster? CATACLYSM!
What kind of cat rhymes with that and is a long religious recitation?
CATECHISM!
What kind of cat is connected to the engine of your car?
CATALYTIC CONVERTER!
What kind of cat facilitates a chemical reaction? CATALYST!
What kind of cat comes in the mail from Sears? CATALOGUE!
What kind of cat is a group of things that are similar? CATEGORY!
What kind of cat is a whole bunch of cows? CATTLE!
What kind of cat throws stuff over the wall of a castle? CATAPULT!
What kind of cat tunnels under the castle? CATACOMB!
What kind of cat floats on two pontoons? CATAMARAN!
What kind of cat takes a picture of the inside of your body? CAT SCAN!
What kind of cat obscures your vision? CATARACT!
What kind of cat is being followed by a moon shadow? CAT STEVENS!
What kind of cat is the capital of Nepal? KATMANDU!
What kind of cat carries your golf clubs? CADDY!
--------------
Regarding free speech and censorship, at the risk of sounding like a broken record:
Give up your free speech at your peril. Once they are able to silence you, the game is over. The loss of all of your other freedoms will follow immediately after. Anyone that advocates to censor you, or to unmask your anonymity is your adversary. Treat them like one - no matter what else they say.
---
Why is it so vital and necessary for the combined monolithic apparatus of government, corporations, and NGOs, to brute force censor everyone while decimating the careers and reputations of the dissenters? Here is why:
The reason the First Amendment is prime directive order 1, is because it is the most important freedom we have for the same reason it is the first target an adversary subverts, disrupts, and destroys during a crime, a war, or a takeover—preventing a target from assembling, communicating, and organizing a response to an assault grants an enormous advantage to the aggressors.
This is and has been occurring all across the globe since the minute this COVID-19 fraud was propagated to every corner of the earth.
The Second Amendment is second because it is the remedy for anyone trying to subvert the First.
I would like to be a caterpillar, but a D-10, much harder to squash.
I’d argue that property rights are up there near the top. Maybe even first, whatever. Well said sir.
While I fully understand why you may think property ownership is more important than free speech--You do not actually have rights that involve land property. If you do not believe me void paying your land taxes for ten years. This may interest you: https://bitchute.com/video/D3SzbLyk0SAV [23 mins]
I agree that we don’t really have property rights. Your points are well taken. My point is simply that property rights are critical.
There is a reason freedom of speech is first. And the right to bear arms second.
Property rights come much lower down, because land is always subject to a government, so those "rights" are really a privilege.
Ok, point taken. I have a response but it’s too involved. I don’t want to attempt it here.
You are not wrong. Property rights would be equal to speech in the enlightenment model. They are not because not having ownership over the land is the ultimate source of slavery the only defense of which is speaking out against such tyranny (speech).
Tell more more, about why this matters to you, please.
Great comment! Thank you, tritorch.
“freedom of speech but not reach” - LMAO. Now that's creative writing that Orwell would be proud of.
It’s an ADL line.
Anyone who thinks Musk is a free speech advocate is hopeful or foolish. Same for Trump. Talk does nothing. And pushing posion jabs kill
I said elon will make it worse. My prediction was that he will force everyone to verify their identity and then with this profile you can say whatever you want. If you dare. But shadowbanning also works...
I hate it too they all.lie.
Dec. 17 tweet, Trump tweeted, “Get those ‘shots’ everyone!”
What is the story behind the picture of the yellow cat being carried away by two uniformed men?
What did the kitty do to warrant that treatment?
he spoke truth to power.
and those who wear the crown have a nasty tendency to speak power to truth in return.
Indeed, to speak violence.
Great piece. Will be interesting to see how substack fares.
"Will be interesting to see how substack fares."
It's only a matter of time.
Yes, probably, oh... fall 2024. Just like Glenn Beck got taken off CNN in 2008, just before Obama's first selection. And from FOX in 2012, before the 2nd. And like Sun News Canada was shut down in 2015 before Trudope's selection... the truth can be inconvenient at times, especially when you are a wanna-be dictator.
"Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing."
- Conquest's 2nd Law of Politics
https://www.isegoria.net/2008/07/robert-conquests-three-laws-of-politics/
That is an awesome page.
“it really does not matter what intentions one starts with or what high ideals are espoused.”
Perhaps the ultimate example of this abyss-staring inevitability is “Do[n’t] be evil.”
Only a few stand against the dazzling temptations.
While I don’t disagree with much of what you say, these are I think relevant points, admittedly, my opinions:
1) Elon has realized he has bitten off more than he can chew. While I was there the censorship never went away, my posts got buried and remained unseen. He was not able to control it.
2) Yaccarino was a desperate effort to fix the losing profitability battle. Poor judgment yes, but it wasn’t because he liked her WEF ties or whatever censorship she may have been involved in.
3) I see only minor differences here, except here it’s likely all profitability. If I criticize a user, however justifiably and that user is making them money, my criticism shall not be seen.
Basically the premise becomes, you can say what you like unless people notice.
As far as changing the circumstances, yuh, that’ll be as easy as was the American Revolution.
I seem to recall Elon himself musing publicly about what kind of person would be foolish enough to take the CEO job. I think he had to take what he could get.
I remember that too. Funny thing about people. Some think they’re not necessarily responsible for outcomes to things they’ve done or will do. Elon belongs to a second group that recognizes responsibility.
Globalists and the usual corporate types are in the first group.
Then again, maybe he just couldn’t wait to get his life back.
It’s always about the money.
Indeed.
In the first place we can learn quite a bit from our brothers and sisters in totalitarian states like China who developed their language online to evade censorship. And who in times prior to the net used fable and story to speak truth to power. In the second place, frankly, for 30 years I have championed from BBS to the WWW political organizing and free speech used to create a new community. A fascinating What If to be sure, what if the energy and enthusiasm from 1963-1980 had been able to be harnessed online? It hasn't. It won't. An incessant babbling about brutality but no direct actions, simply hands on keyboards reporting on the Home Front Casualties caused by the Civil Defense Community-CDC-will. And nothing changes. Tweedle Dumb holds power until pried from the hands of Democrats. Tweedle Dee will be just as bad. And the beat goes on:
https://youtu.be/OzkYYE6hmjg
i fear that such "coded speech" will fail in the face of AI and self learning large language models. the censorship wars are about to get hopelessly more complex with suppression, subversion, tinsel, gaslighting, thematic burying, and "agree and extend to absurdity" operations to discredit taking place so fast it will be hard to discern what is real.
the only solution here will be a verified reputation economy. everything else is going to become static.
Nostr
I know that you're not a huge fan of bitcoin, but those many of those folks are very serious about privacy and freedom. And they're good at tech. Please take a look at Nostr
Yes. Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?
Not to mention the reader has to know the code.
So let us reason together. There exist three choices. The objection of the key is not formidable as it worked in China. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/03/china-social-media-language-government-censorship-covid/
1. No speech
2. Plain speech
3. Coded speech or lingo
A.I. is not really needed though of course deployed. I am sure China uses A.I but as you see speech is more than hammering a nail.
I personally favor plain speech in political discourse and direction action is speech. During the bombing of El Salvador Americans resisting this war did alter billboards to present US planes bombing. There many other examples of speech modifying billboards. We have to resist. Open discourse is best. Speaking the truth to shame the devil's disciples. The devil does not care.
Honest question (I'm not very knowledgeable about computers et c), given Gato's reply:
Co ul dan AI d ec od eth iss ente nce?
You and I can read it (assuming neither of us is extremely dyslexic) with a little effort. A human censor could too.
But could a machine? I h one stlyd on 'tk now.
So if A.I. did not it is a routed to human eyeballs in Torrance, CA at the PLA Knowledge Intercept site where for about 1/3d of 2022 minimum wage cadre can come to California for a job and settle in barracks and then in LA.
It would take some additional programming effort, probably, but a machine could definitely be made to decode that.
Amen, brother.
Long before the Web, there was Usenet. The agora was the set of "news groups". They were collections of text email messages posted to the groups. Anyone could start a new group, and anyone could read it. The communication protocol was UUCP (Unix to Unix Copy). Communication was entirely decentralized: A computer would contact one or more other computers (over dial-up modems) periodically and transfer the new messages, and thus the messages were spread. Anyone could add their computers to Usenet. The owner of each computer would decide which outside computers it would share data with, and which groups it would share. Each computer held the entire database of messages - the net was quite small then. In time, the system became bogged down by spam messages.
Some time after the Web was born, Google took over the Usenet groups, put them under centralized control, and renamed them "Google Groups". They may still exist, but I'm not sure.
Something like a modern version of the original Usenet is, I think, what would work.
Haha, I met my wife on Usenet :-)
I'm sure we could do a better version today. The problem I see is connectivity. Denial of service is happening to people, so what do you do if you can't find an ISP or they all have terms of service that forbid you from using your computer as a server or a node on this new network?
I don't think you can encrypt the IP address. A cooperative VPN would be mandatory, but then the VPN company becomes the target.
Hey, I just found something that could be interesting: https://blueskyweb.xyz/faq
My knowledge of networks is at the chipped stone tool level, so I don't know anything about this, but maybe someone is looking for a way out of censorship hell.
What I observe is censorship had already succeeded in programming people to self-censor. I participate on a religious forum that leans progressive. The comments reveal an unshakable tribalism.
Recently a contributor argued that economic circumstances and outcomes proved the only viable vote was for Democrats. I responded that evidence showed it might be better to not support either major political party, and I shared the history of recent bipartisan government policies that bailed out corporate cronies, caused inflation and hurt the lower class.
The response to what I wrote was that I was completely wrong. Republicans were evil and Democrats were righteous. With such people truth has no value. What their tribe believes is the truth and that is what guides every thought and decision.
Come on everybody...think of Elon's big love..neurolink....he wants what's left of our brains...I believe he is a frontman for wef...he's having fun at our expense...
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/aug/11/elon-musk-mark-zuckerberg-cage-fight-italy-government
I hope they both maim and obliterate each other. Good riddance to complicit, democidal PSYCHOPATHS ‼️😡🤬
Great writing, as usual. In fact you are one of the best writers out there. And I have a feeling it's not what you trained in (for lack of a better word). Matt Taibbi and some of the other reporters are good at their job, doing what journalists should do. Maybe that's why they aren't memorable or moving stylists. Despite Taibbi's obsession with Hunter Thompson, he can't seem to access that state which turns prose into poetry. But this is the fourth of fifth essay of yours I've read that forces me to stop and inhale deeply, because it is somehow absurd for a 57 year old man to be brought to tears by an internet post, and I like to think I'm more dignified than that. But you are good. Your ability to invoke that "god damn fuckin' right!" feeling in your readers is invaluable. Even if this whole project is doomed it's still the only option, the only project worth anything.
people always seem to underestimate the therapeutic value of cats.
Is a private employer allowed to demand I do not hold and express opinions contrary to company policy, in my own time on my own dime, under penalty of termination of employment?
If yes, then my freedom of speech/reach does not exist.
If no, who's going to enforce this right of mine over the power of the company?
If I'm sitting at a café, am I allowed to quietly read a book or paper that the management finds offensive?
If I want to print and publish a book, is the printer allowed to refuse based on content?
I could spend all night thinking up questions like these, where the censor is a private entity.
I think you need to study 19th century history real good, Gato. This isn't a new issue, just new tech.
Dearest Gato and GatoFollowers - Time to look at Nostr! It's decentralized and messages are sent along relays. There are clients (that are similar to Twitter, Instagram, etc) and you can keep your audience across the different clients.
https://nostr.com/
examples threads in Primal (a twitter-like client): https://primal.net/p/npub1trr5r2nrpsk6xkjk5a7p6pfcryyt6yzsflwjmz6r7uj7lfkjxxtq78hdpu
https://primal.net/p/npub1jlvkktgww82fd54zg5aj4ayaep2z0tmysa83amfqq22hx8zureyst74fll
Agreed
nostr is still small but, it is evolving fast, and it already has good discussions there.
the new gossip model may help with descentralized server (relay) discovery for the use case of following people
https://mikedilger.com/gossip-model/
and there is already a substack equivalent (long well formated posts)
https://habla.news/
which accepts direct lightining tips to authors
Early stages but the landscape is evolving and there are many encouraging developments.
It was clear when the mElon hired ardent communist Linda Yaccarino as ceo of Twitter that there would only be more and more censorship. I told him then that he had nothing worth paying him for. I see no reason to participate in my own enslavement. Substack is sub par for audience size but is providing freedom to publish. Even quite foul mouthed people who espouse ideas that would get them banned from the X-rated Twitter are free to post here on Substack.
Even when Elon was running Twitter by himself, he tweeted that "Freedom of speech does not equal freedom of reach", stating that shadow banning would continue. He unbanned some people, but continued to ban others like Alex Jones. He allows NAFO trolls to brigade people. He banned a Substack writer I follow, and banned tweets that link to Substack. It's extremely disappointing.
The “freedom of speech does not equal freedom of reach” is a parroted ADL line.
I anticipated my “permanent” ejection from the Twitterverse overruled the moment free speech was carried through the entry door within a kitchen sink. But mysteriously denial of repatriation continues. Anyone else experience issues at the turnstile of societal participation? Have your shoes been sniffed there at?