can you even remember the last time a school you went to or had kids in closed because too many teachers were sick?
in my entire childhood, i cannot remember a single one.
yet here we had such a “large number of staff have a negative reaction to the covid booster shot” that they had to cancel school.
is “booster day” the new snow day? because this sounds pretty significant.
i also bet it’s going to get prevalent. they just generally won’t be this honest about it.
note that there is also a substitute teacher shortage.
between boosters and folks quitting/fired over mandates, both teachers (increasing demand for subs) and subs (decreasing supply) it’s perhaps not difficult to imagine why this staffing shortfall has become acute…
brace for more of this. the endless wreckage of this crop of con artists is going to really start piling up.
Amazing part is that this school district actually admitted the boosters were the problem. Had this originated from a media source...obfuscation. If only Gavin Newsome would be so forthcoming.
My dad's wife got a booster about two months ago. She is sick and tested positive a few days ago. So much for that 3rd shot, huh? My dad tested positive today. And this is all thanks to a vaccinated person who gave it to them. Awesome.
I didn't used to believe in sluffing of vaccinations until I ended up with "covid" after visiting friends for a day who had just proudly got their J&J's a few days prior. I hadn't been anywhere else or around anyone else and ended up with this bio-weapon illness. I totally believe in quarantine for the INJECTED!
When my co-workers ran out to get jabbed (and literally applauded each other for it) I came down with a week long vomiting episode. Nothing else wrong with me, no fever, no covid-like symptoms. Never had anything like it, and it wasn't consistent with food poisoning or viral vomititis ("stomach flu" was the diagnosis but I didn't have any symptoms that matched except throwing up).
There's no VAERS for vaccinated-adjacent adverse events so I just sit and wonder if it might have been a shedding issue or what.
I heard n a podcast (so I’m sure it must be true) that Pfizer told their people to observe any AEs in family members or roommates of people in the trial. It seems they knew of shedding.
Just think about all the kids being exposed to shedding if all the teachers are getting boosters now. Maybe it’s a good thing that schools get shut down for a while.
I’ve heard of that but for some reason I don’t think it happens with all. My son dated a gal and he was around her a lot during her jabs. I was concerned but nothing happened.
There are scientists outs there saying that there are saline placebos with the covid label on the vial, and I've wondered with some of my patients having NO reaction AT ALL to either injection if maybe they got those...but then weeks or months later, like everyone else who's injected, they come up with 'unexplained' inflammatory issues in their body.
All I'm saying is that it's possible that some of these vials are in fact NOT whatever is in the covid injections...and could be placebo...but then again, maybe they just didn't react to the injection at the time. There are so many unknowns we're dealing with here.
As I remember there was at least one doctor who got ahold of five vials of one of the "vaccines", I think from the same batch, and tested them. Two of the vials had only saline solution in them. I'm pretty sure there were some other cases where people found vials that had only saline in them. Until then, the idea that some shots were placebos was just a theory, but this seems to confirm it. If this example is representative, that would suggest 2/5ths of the jabs, at least initially, were placebos.
Yes, it's hard to find this sort of information out there, and when we do, it's just a handful of scientists (or usually just 1-2) doing this research. It never makes it to the mainstream news (why would it?!?!). I also worry about the longevity of the lives of the people doing this testing!! But when it doesn't make to the mainstream media (which is being carefully monitored), who cares if the Truth is out there, right? The only people watching it and reading about it are people like us, who have at least SOME idea of what is really going on.
The worrying thing is, if up to 2/5ths of a batch are causing this amount of adverse reactions & deaths (and yes, some batches might be worse than others as other research seems to have shown), what would happen if ALL injections were 'full strength'...? The mind boggles, for sure.
But we have to remember - the madness driving this comes not from sane people like you or I. It comes from psychopaths, sociopaths, narcissists, megalomaniacs, and any other words you want to insert here! They care not about the little minions of the world. The lab workers at Big Pharma are 'just doing their job' and most people just 'follow the rules'.
The only reason this covid crap is upon us NOW is because there is finally the technological know-how/ability to perform a full-scale attack on the people of the world.
If some are, wouldn't the purpose of them to be to measure the difference from the other biotechnology? That would not be possible if the batches had a mixture of some real and some placebo.
Another thought is a percentage, say 20%, is left placebo because there will be a need for some "healthy" people to keep the "ghost in the machine" operating for a time.
Or maybe the pharma companies are unable to actually produce the fully-toxic vexxation due to it's elements being either difficult to obtain or create for the entire globe at one time...
I'm just trying to noodle it out... which, when one is their level of diabolical is more challenging.
Dunno if there’s “proof” like in many claims tday, but I know our local LtG did a show n tell booster after long time advertising he didn’t need any shots since he had the virus. Just don’t think he’d risk his health, so did fake jab.
Nah. That's just as bad as the other. Look up Terrain theory and keep an eye on what goes into your stomach, exercise and if its winter make sure you have your vitamin D daily.
And they're trying to explain it away by blaming it on teachers taking an extra long holiday weekend. Funny, I always remembered teachers I knew having their last minute vacation denied when there weren't available substitutes.
I am retired and sub teach. My public school here in VA just required the shot for all staff. We part ways in January and they will be short another sub.
I’m just waiting for the media to tell us how this is really a good thing for our children and the teachers alike and it means the injection is working so well and the kids will be better-protected and silly you for thinking this is bad in any way. Oh wait, never mind. They won’t say a word about this.
It continually amazes me that the same people who who are fraidy-cats about getting covid and getting sick without vaccines don't appear to be in the least bit worried about the vaccines themselves making them sick! Disconnect, anyone?
So excruciatingly true—although I’m beginning to believe most of these people don’t READ, period. And they’d be hard-pressed to tell you who Orwell even is.
His other famous book, Animal Farm, has a wonderful passage about the cat which I shall reproduce here in honor of our host:
“And the behaviour of the cat was somewhat peculiar. It was soon noticed that when there was work to be done the cat could never be found. She would vanish for hours on end, and then reappear at meal-times, or in the evening after work was over, as though nothing had happened. But she always made such excellent excuses, and purred so affectionately, that it was impossible not to believe in her good intentions.” (p. 12) 😺
Or "The Children's Story...but not just for children" by James Clavell. Copyright 1963.
It begins..."the teacher was afraid. And the children were afraid. All except Johnny. He watched the classroom door with hate. He felt the hatred deep within his stomach. It gave him strength."
I haven’t had a chance to read it yet, but the children’s book format can be very disarming and may permit a little truth slip to through the brainwashing, as several attested regarding my fairy tale (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/the-vapor-the-hot-hat-and-the-witches), which was also written for adults and children alike.
don't think they believe the hundreds or thousands or millions of stories of vaxxx injured people, "rare" breakthrough cases, and deaths. brainwashed cats, heads full of catnip.
And even when I point out the potential connection, it still takes a while for it to sink in...and that's ONLY if they've been feeling like rubbish for a while. If it's a smaller problem, not life-threatening, or totally zapping their energy levels for months, then they just pass it off. Getting through to people whose minds are closed is REALLY REALLY HARD!!!! And really frustrating!
Same here. A lot have small issues right now, tinnitus, myalgia, one’s husband has a heart arrhythmia, tingling in hands. No one wants to hear that it’s the vax. It’s like they are putting their hands over their hears and saying nononono like little kids. Yet, they are all getting the boosters. It’s CRAZY!
big bird said so, it must be good, right, ugh, and Walensky agreed with the yellow bird, too, plus $100 incentives for the kids, and told they are super heroes ... Steve Kirsch asks how come no one can explain why 14 kids died during the trials
Horrifying. Let's hope that what is predicted doesn't come true as so-called "parents" rush their children aged 5 - 11 down to get the EXPERIMENTAL shot!
Wow. First all the healthcare workers quit because they don't want to be poisoned. Then airlines have to ground their machines due to pilots either too sick to fly or quit. Now school closed because too many poisoned teachers...
I've long maintained that the Vaccine is the best diagnostic tool created to spot and eliminate all cause frailty some of which would include Covid susceptibility. Its a genius way to show people who might have died from Covid, but we ensured a peaceful death first.
Seems likely, but the signal for such an effect is hard to make out, since the vaccine was preceded by the virus which probably already calibrated "pending" deaths to below-trend levels.
And this is part of the reason why we home school our children now!
1. They'll actually GET an education
2. They'll get a proper, well-rounded education
3. They'll be healthy whilst they learn (no masks, no experimental injections, no hanging around sick, injected people etc)
Best part is that they are FAR happier being home schooled! Sure, it's way more work for my poor hubby, and especially me, but this is the next generation: we need to take care of them and keep them safe, and I mean that in its truest form, not the way the govt says they'll 'keep you safe'...
If you'd seen what happened with not just the school down the road, but how our state education system is run (I'm in Australia) you'd know there was no other option!
I can only imagine: things are also quite grim here in Canada.
Public health doctors (who have all turned into media whores) are trying to outdo each other on the doom and gloom and the school boards lap it up. I've seen children wearing masks outside during recess (school is across the street), I makes me want to weep.
I think is even more than that. I think forcing kids to be behind a mask all day will ultimately cause mental issues like fear, paranoia, anxiety, depression etc. Time will tell unfortunately.
These people are teaching the youth of America and were dumb enough to not only take the first two Phase III trial experimental serum(s), they went long on the third and totally un-tested-not-even-in-any-phase-trial experimental serum. Trust the plan.
Thank you for that comment. Wry amusement: on the one hand, Big Brother ignores old standards (rigorous testing), changes them (e.g. PCR test), OK's drugs (upon what research?) or modifications of their uses: e.g. authorize boosters when these were never tested, for cohorts never in what passed for formal Phase 3 trials (e.g. pregnant women, kids 5-11, and ?? ), advocates mix & match of different products and who knows what other malarkey. Then they are annoyed when us Proles are self-medicating with "horse dewormer," snorting iodine and hydrogen peroxide, or what have you.
What I don’t get: don’t ppl on tge Left love their kids also? Surely they must. And let’s face it: there are so many questions surrounding vaccine and kids, school closures and kids, masking and kids. Remember alar and apples? Distrust of corporate entities used to be a leftist thing. I don’t get it. I actually suspect many more of them than will admit it share our doubts.
I believe that this has become a weird cultish religion. I am a Christian and no one could change my mind about my beliefs no matter what they did and how much they tried to convince me. The same thing applies to these indoctrinated people. Once it becomes a "religion" to them it's nearly impossible to reverse. Horrifying.
The political ideologies have flip flopped. Left is now pro-law and order, at least as far as enforcing mandates are concerned, and the right is now extremely vocal about my body my choice.
Main Street Democrats are just now starting to realize they are the party of Wall Street, "Lockdown" corporations such as Wal-Mart and Amazon, the party of the media, the party of endless war........
I'm so far left that I can't stomach Democrats, and totally distrust corporations and authoritarian governments. I don't recognize the left anymore. Here's something I wrote today:
It seems clear that Trump Derangement Syndrome has had a profound effect on the brains of Democrats. I think it irreversibly activated the reptilian parts of their brains. That results in an inability to think clearly on subjects that activate. The condition makes cognitive dissonance intolerable. Hence, the aggression towards the unvaxxed. I don't see that anything can be done about it.
Dose 3 in a never ending series would be more honest.
If 1& 2 haven't done the trick, why keep going?
It's a bit like the obsession with testing children in school which plagued the latter years of my teaching career. The mentality of politicians being: 'If we keep measuring them- they'll do better'.
If they just keep rolling out boosters, but gradually reduce the "active ingredient' until it's all saline, they be able to declare victory when herd immunity is finally allowed to ensue.
THAT is a future I could cope with better. Although the damage will still have been done by then.
But you think it'll gradually morph into a saline solution...??! Ha ha ha! I don't think thought processes like this ever see the light of day in the brainwaves of the psychopaths behind all this covid crap...
I'm not sure I buy the "saline" conspiracy theory. Like many conjectures, it is possible, but is it probable? In the first place, adulterating medications or even mislabeling is at least sometimes a serious felony. If they were going to flout such laws, at the least, they would probably experiment with different formulations and covertly track the results using computerized medical records.
Testing has its uses. But at least applied to schools, the goal is to to find someone to blame. This of course, is usually the teachers. Children under-performing? Must be the teachers' fault. Violence and disorder in the halls? Must be the teachers' fault. Consideration of other causative factors is usually discouraged, at least by anyone that wishes to keep their job.
You’re right, it’s not a booster. It’s the same liability free shot as the first two. The only one that has been approved and has liability is Comirnaty and that one has not been released yet. If it ever will.
Definitely not a "booster" in the usual sense. Rather, it appears to be just another SHOT (not vaccine). Maybe the mentality is now "If we just keeping shooting up everyone, maybe the shot will eventually work".
No, the mentality is "get them hooked on endless boosters, so we can roll out the vaxx passports." And then the "social credit" system. https://postlmg.cc/BXykMy0T
He gave a great talk at the Florida Covid Symposium last week, and indeed says one-and-done. You don't need, or want, to add a dose of spike protein to another dose. He also says once you catch Covid, don't test anymore. This just clouds the picture and feeds the narrative of doom.
Note that the power brokers need neither test nor shot. The construction industry runs our state — both the economy and the politicians. Their mandates are none. And the politicos and staff need not vax. Ppl — why do you not think enough red flags?
wow, thank you, just saw this. no, we had snow days back in the day, not a huge amount of sick teachers. everywhere that there has been mass vaccinations, a large number, Vermont, other countries, suddenly, yeah sure right, a whole lot of people are filling up the hospitals and the miscreants cannot figure out why that is. from the weather, the air, the water, the boosters.
My daughter was an elementary teacher for 11 years (before she decided to go into nursing). Every single year beginning in about October, kids started getting sick and then teachers usually got sick too.
"A fully vaccinated plane passenger, 51, was infected with coronavirus and found dead in his seat on Pegasus Airlines Flight 1043 from Istanbul, Turkey, to Hamburg, Germany."
What if you were flying on a plane with a fully boosted person who died mid-flight and the government said that the post mortem report cannot contain Covid because flying with covid is not allowed which is why the vaccine is mandated. They couldn't have died from the vaccine, because they are safe and effective.
So we are thinking about creating a new category of death - "Not Covid or Covid Vaccine" Death.
Apparently, they have a way to measure these types of death in UK and they appear to be 10x for single vs double dosed.
See prof. Norman Fenton's Analysis from All-cause Mortality data.
Can someone with the expert knowledge tell me why the single dose of the vaccine is allowing itself to be found in the dead bodies of people at 10 times the rate its finding itself in bodies of double dosed?
I don't know much about Fenton's work but it seems like he's being confusing on purpose.
"1st dose mortality rates" don't start to climb until week 20+, right where his chart begins, as the elderly who are not in health crisis get their 2nd dose, reducing the denominator until those who had a reason not to get the second dose are left in that group - including, of course, those whose reason was "health crisis." If he showed the rates before the "not in crisis" elderly were selected out of the 1st dose group, the per-100k rates would be quite lower.
It isn't much different for the "unvaccinated" elderly except the selection bias (removal of the healthy elderly from the denominator) probably takes effect many weeks earlier.
After he wrote that and told ONS to release the age stratified raw data for all cause mortality they promised him they would and they did. Except they released it stratified only for population over 60. And everyone from 10-59 was clubbed together. You can guess why.
Important to note: The data excludes the most crucial periods. The beginning of vaccination on December 8 2020 when most of the elderly died within a few days after vaccination, and the booster period which started recently and where 1 dose deaths with covid started to compare poorly with unvaccinated as well.
Prof. Fenton basically showed that the assumptions
1) the denominators are accurate
2) All cause mortality and covid mortality for vaccinated is lower for over vaccinated in over 60s only
3) Vaccine causes no harm
cannot all be true, if a single dose is killing faster than no dose.
So the denominators must be wrong (his contention is that the vaccinated are inflated and unvaccinated undercounted)
If we believe the denominators are wrong but in the other direction as the people who disbelieve negative Vaccine Effectiveness suggest, then Prof. Clare Craig shows that it would imply negative infection rates in vaccinated or completely test evading variant/non-testing or 7.5m vaccinated just disappearing. She contends all those are impossibilities so the VE cannot be 90 or whatever claimed in the new UKHSA report especially if the want to claim protection from severe disease and death as using ONS denominators would imply very fast killing in the 80+ which is by far the most at risk.
In short, they are both trying to suggest that something is wrong with the denominators and that the denominators are not wrong in the direction the people claiming high Vaccine Effectiveness against infection claim it is. It's in the opposite direction according to some.
Of course, this is not the only possibility. Since the denominators could be right or wrong and still give us the same answer if we simply look at rates and knowns. So one easy sanity check is only relying on what we can measure. We cannot measure the number of unvaccinated directly but we can measure the vaccinated with some confidence and measure the outcomes of those that move from unvaccinated to vaccinated with 1 dose to vaccinated with 2 doses.
This movement should be population non-specific and if some common risk factor is present then we will see the same relative risk no matter when or where we look.
Prof. Fenton is picking on the single dose to demonstrate that the outrageous rate has to explained. It's not expected that the rate of death of upon starting a treatment regime will be substantially higher than before or after the treatment regimen while also claiming its safe.
It's not specific to England. You look at Scotland's latest PHS report and you find the same effect even when they club the 1 dosed within 21 days to unvaccinated. The same effect in Singapore where the partially vaccinated dying faster than vaccinated. Same in many other jurisdictions.
I can link if someone wants to see the reports.
"In three of the last four weeks’, age-standardised mortality rates for COVID-19 deaths shown in Table 20 are lower for people who have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine compared to individuals that are unvaccinated or have received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
In the last week, age-standardised mortality rates for COVID-19 deaths are similar for people who have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine compared to individuals that are unvaccinated or have received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, however the confidence intervals for the unvaccinated age-standardised mortality rates are wide. In the last week, the mean age of unvaccinated individuals with a confirmed COVID-19 related death was 71.5 years old, whereas the mean age of individuals that received 2 doses of vaccine and had a confirmed COVID-19 related death was 77.5 years old."
My basic point is that the effect is real and not a local statistical anomaly. The fact that ONS UK wouldn't release the age stratified data for 60 and under should give people a clue as to what's happening. All cause in this aggregate is higher for vaccinated. Why? and which group? And when?
The answers to those questions have been published independently by the UK government reports. Let's just say - the hospitalization rate after the 1st dose for people under 60 increases non-linearly.
And we know the most vulnerable elderly already died within days to weeks of the start of the vaccination campaign so their deaths won't be counted in the dataset they released making the averages look even more suspicious. You'd have to explain why the covid vaccines are saving people from dying of any cause unless you believe that this group is systematically lower risk (making comparisons with vaccinated impossible) or if the method of protection is more along the lines of depletion of susceptibles before the counting begins (AKA all V.E. protocol for Covid Vaccines, never start counting until everyone who can die or recover from the vaccine has already died or recovered)
I don't disagree that the denominator for the unvaccinated is unreliable.
I still don't understand why the 1st dose data is being rendered so unnecessarily confusing. This is not a controlled experiment, "let's give X 60 year old volunteers only 1 dose and see how they fare." Fenton and co, by your description, seem to be willfully pretending that this is the case. In real life plenty of "only 1 dose" recipients are still alive and kicking - which is exactly why they went on to have a 2nd dose, leaving those who had health complications in the "only 1 dose" cohort.
They are not pretending, they are showing the data. Plenty of people were given a single dose and they waited 12 weeks to their second. These people shouldn't die faster than people who got no dose. There is no way around this.
Scotland data shows same. If it cannot be established that a single dose is safe, then there is no point of talking about the safety of the second.
The safety of the second *is* the safety of the first. You can't have the second without having the first. Looking at "only" first, after most of the population has moved on to the second, creates selection bias for ill health. That's all.
In that case the safety of the Covid disease is better than the vaccine in people under 60. Since most people with Covid disease appear to have fared better in all cause.
I don't buy this logic, but it follows from your assertion.
All cause mortality data is not available by booster in UK death data yet. However until before the boosters from Jan 2 to September 24th they found all-cause death in people under 60 to be 2x unvaccinated. In the 60-69 age group like others over 60, the consistent pattern was seen where someone getting a single dose was dying of any cause at a rate almost 10 times that of people who made it to the double dose.
In other words. The UK is covering up the age stratified deaths in people in under 60, and where they are not covering it up, we see that the unvaccinated have a lower risk of death than those that chose to get vaccinated but couldn't make it to their second.
So, if you are confident that you won't die in your first dose, then yes, your second dose might protect you from deaths of all causes compared to the unvaccinated in people over 60.
This actually really just proves 1 thing and 1 thing only: The people who are vaccinated repeatedly only have a better mortality than those who chose not to vaccinate in that age group not because the vaccine protected them from covid, but because the vaccine filters people who will be able to survive it. Meaning, the vaccine didn't protect you, you protected you, and gave credit to the vaccine because it didn't kill you yet.
This one is tricky to analyze, because if you die after your first shot you never make it to the second. So those who get two are somehow hardier. For now anyway.
I've not explained something far more critical and decisive yet because I've noticed that people are not emotionally ready for it, but I will explain it in a few months when the evidence will be undeniable and the anomalous deaths start piling up in people who were double vaccinated or recovered and young.
The specific case of the mid-flight death of a 51 year old double vaccinated who was SARS-COV-2 negative at boarding, without symptoms but dropped dead at 20,000 ft should give pause to people who are overconfident about this insidious problem we are facing. Here's a clue about what one should know before declarative statements about the causality of covid vaccines and sudden covid positivity at death. I wish I could make pronouncements now but I cannot because I don't have the data to prove something is happening but I believe we will see something very odd soon with the speed at which we are interfering with children's immune system. We will see a tsunami.
"Latent herpes virus reactivation has been demonstrated in astronauts during shuttle (10–16 days) and International Space Station (≥180 days) flights. Following reactivation, viruses are shed in the body fluids of astronauts. Typically, shedding of viral DNA is asymptomatic in astronauts regardless of mission duration; however, in some cases, live/infectious virus was recovered by tissue culture that was associated with atopic-dermatitis or skin lesions during and after spaceflight. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axes activation during spaceflight occurs as indicated by increased levels of stress hormones including cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. These changes, along with a decreased cell mediated immunity, contribute to the reactivation of latent herpes viruses in astronauts. Currently, 47/89 (53%) astronauts from shuttle-flights and 14/23 (61%) astronauts from ISS missions shed one or more herpes viruses in saliva/urine samples. Astronauts shed Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and herpes-simplex-1 (HSV-1) in saliva and cytomegalovirus (CMV) in urine. Larger quantities and increased frequencies for these viruses were found during spaceflight as compared to before or after flight samples and their matched healthy controls. The shedding did not abate during the longer ISS missions, but rather increased in frequency and amplitude. These findings coincided with the immune system dysregulation observed in astronauts from shuttle and ISS missions. VZV shedding increased from 41% in space shuttle to 65% in ISS missions, EBV increased 82 to 96%, and CMV increased 47 to 61%. In addition, VZV/CMV shed ≤30 days after ISS in contrast to shuttle where VZV/CMV shed up to 5 and 3 days after flight respectively. Continued shedding of infectious-virus post-flight may pose a potential risk for crew who may encounter newborn infants, sero-negative adults or any immunocompromised individuals on Earth. Therefore, developing spaceflight countermeasures to prevent viral reactivation is essential. Our spaceflight-developed technologies for saliva collection/rapid viral detection have been extended to include clinical applications including zoster patients, chicken pox, post-herpetic neuralgia, multiple sclerosis, and various neurological disorders. These protocols are employed in various clinics and hospitals including the CDC and Columbia University in New York, as well as overseas in Switzerland and Israel."
But are you saying that we should expect to see all sorts of reactivation of previous illnesses in people having the covid injections? That something (potentially latent) they have in their system will play up? And are you suggesting that it could be not just EBV, CMV, HSV etc as mentioned above, but also previous problems like cancer, diverticulitis, heart conditions, disc (spinal) problems, headaches, sinus issues, allergies etc...?
I'm already noticing that almost all my patients who have had covid injections have had adverse reactions of one sort or another, often delayed by 3-6 months, but sometimes happening (very) soon after the injection. Sometimes they're minor issues, but definitely a deviation from that patient's 'normal'. Easier to see if you've been treating them for many years: you have a better gauge of what is 'normal' for that patient. But sometimes the issues are quite serious. The body is hardy, but things catch up with us eventually.
I can see, at least anecdotally, that things are a-changing. I have read many science papers and it confirms changes I am seeing in my clinic. The future DOES look grim. I think you should reconsider our emotional readiness and put your thoughts on the table, AlmostWrong. We need to be as awake as possible to survive our future, and if people can steel themselves against what is to happen, then that sounds good in my books! I also practice astrology (have done since I was 10 years old!) so I'm able to look into the crystal ball a bit, shall we say? But one can just be good at solving puzzles and assimilating information to also see what is currently happening. Being good at science and understanding human nature + economics helps!
Thanks for sharing. My fear is that speaking too soon may jeopardize our collective efforts to end this pandemic, because without convincing proof, I may not be able to persuade anyone to force their local officials to do specific tests or release specific data. And since most of these conversations are monitored by people in the know, they maybe able to pickup on what we are discussing and send people to sabotage to misdirect discussion to irrelevancies. I once posted an analysis of the raw data from a paper that showed something uncomfortable for the vaccinated. Within 2 days of my posting my analysis of the raw numbers, that file was literally deleted from the University Website. There was no good reason given except the new dataset contained fewer datapoints and made the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated such that they appeared identical. This was not the case in the original dataset and it looked worse for vaccinated. Similarly, you might be aware of Project Salus VE results from DOD following the over 65 cohort in the US which was abruptly removed because it didn't show what they claimed it would show all summer.
When they keep removing information that as you said are small pieces of the puzzle, it becomes increasingly difficult to near impossible to make a case without referencing "secret knowledge". In science, nothing should be secret but if they keep deleting stuff thats highly relevant to the pandemic and there is no way to get them to reproduce it, people will have to take me at my word that something I am showing is the real dataset and not manipulated. For example, I do have the dataset saved with the CT values, infectious viral culture titers and symptom onset data from the Wisconsin study in breakthrough cases. But why would someone believe an anon account's analysis if the original is missing from the website? They shouldn't.
Which is why I've decided I will try to figure out everything end to end, present it all at once so that if it's wrong, it can be easily evaluated. If it's not wrong, then someone can follow the evidence to build on it and hopefully get authorities to look at the data and explain why the scenario presented can be dismissed.
But telling people what can't be demonstrated (yet) will do nothing to convince anyone but will give those that are worried that publicly available data can be used to show the impact of the health campaign is disastrous will swiftly move to remove those clues. We cannot afford more censorship right now, because the people who we trusted to do their jobs are not capable anymore.
But to your first question: Notice these stories:
"Fifty-two passengers on one flight from Delhi to Hong Kong test positive for coronavirus after landing - despite ALL presenting a negative test while boarding"
This is pointing to something more general than space flight - Rapid changes in (Atmospheric) pressure likely leads to immune regulatory failures. Does it have any implications for people who are doing anything that involves rapid changes in pressure like diving into a swimming pool? Can medications help here?
And the powers are saying take the flu shot and the booster at the same time. Are the powers nuts? People should know better too. We are so F’ing with our immune systems.
I wonder if this is why airline and military pilots are resisting these shots so hard. Maybe they are aware of the effects of high altitude on their bodies. I have read they are exposed to radiation (x rays? gamma rays?) at those heights regularly.
I don't doubt that the booster can cause immediate nasty reactions, but from what my teacher friends tell me about being in the schools this year, they'll do ANYTHING for a sick day. Were they eligible for a free sick day to deal with side effects? Are "vaccine side effects" actually a code for "our teachers needed a break from your kids, who are throwing chairs and cursing at us because they are so broken?"
Australia health minister whining that hospitals overwhelmed with covid cases. The country is 81.5% double vaxxed..so with 18.5 % un-vaxxed, dispersed across the country, it’s unlikely hospitals being overwhelmed by un-jabbed. The interesting party…the narrative for pandemics of the vaxxed across the globe are now coy by using “covid cases” rather than “breakthrough.” Wait for it to happen in the US. Saginaw committed an egregious crime of truth.
They can't help themselves, they just have to keep the narrative of the unvaxxed going. I just read an article in my local paper written by a prominent local doctor. He stated yet again that all the local "case spread" was due to the unvaxxed and that you get far BETTER immunity from vaccines than from the natural immunity of having had Covid. Aggghhhhhh!
During 1968 flu they had to close my school for a week. Not to keep people “safe,” but because most were too sick to attend. I, my sister and 56 yo mother all pulled through.
And then in 69 they had Woodstock and it became iconic, especially for the left. Now it would be banned in blue states and labeled a superspreader if a red state held it.
I live in the Denver area, and there are 4 different school districts that are closing school on Friday and maybe longer due to a shortage of teachers. Some regular teachers are sick or out for other reasons, and there are not enough subs to fill in.
My son in Michigan just graduated college and plans on substitute teaching for a year until returning for master’s degree to obtain certification. He’s finally getting fingerprinted and background checked (his dad updated me). He stupidly voluntarily jabbed so they’ll love him subbing.
He still isn’t calling me back or texting. He was mad before I wouldn’t get vaxxed, don’t believe it’s safe, and wish he hadn’t gotten vaxxed, and now just won’t bother talking with me. He’s mad I didn’t want him to get Gardasil either. I’m not anti vax, just anti new vaxxes.
This crap is just unbelievable. Aside from the truly bad side effects, everyone I know who has had it has had flu-like symptoms for a day or two. I was in the military and travelled to 3rd world countries with the US government. I've had every damn shot in the book, including flu every year, and never once have I had ANY side effects. There is clearly something wrong with these and it's been obvious from the start.
They are hiring substitute teachers in MI, there is indeed a shortage...but also requiring the shot, of course. I think if you're in retirement age and don't want to take unnecessary risks you can pull the plug. Or take some time off until the "coast clears."
The honesty does seem surprising, but I like to think it is the beginning of the undeniability of this Crime Against Humanity. After all, while "they" want it to be so, everyone is not complicit in it.
There was also a moderately publicized call for a WORLD WIDE walkout 8-11 Nov. Could be civil disobedience. Given that we are talking about teachers though, I doubt it.
Amazing part is that this school district actually admitted the boosters were the problem. Had this originated from a media source...obfuscation. If only Gavin Newsome would be so forthcoming.
You can bet that someone received a severe reprimand for being so forthcoming with the truth.
don't need to look to know it is pathetic depravity. Sorry your father didn't do his ONE JOB.
My dad's wife got a booster about two months ago. She is sick and tested positive a few days ago. So much for that 3rd shot, huh? My dad tested positive today. And this is all thanks to a vaccinated person who gave it to them. Awesome.
I didn't used to believe in sluffing of vaccinations until I ended up with "covid" after visiting friends for a day who had just proudly got their J&J's a few days prior. I hadn't been anywhere else or around anyone else and ended up with this bio-weapon illness. I totally believe in quarantine for the INJECTED!
What symptoms did you have?
When my co-workers ran out to get jabbed (and literally applauded each other for it) I came down with a week long vomiting episode. Nothing else wrong with me, no fever, no covid-like symptoms. Never had anything like it, and it wasn't consistent with food poisoning or viral vomititis ("stomach flu" was the diagnosis but I didn't have any symptoms that matched except throwing up).
There's no VAERS for vaccinated-adjacent adverse events so I just sit and wonder if it might have been a shedding issue or what.
I heard n a podcast (so I’m sure it must be true) that Pfizer told their people to observe any AEs in family members or roommates of people in the trial. It seems they knew of shedding.
Knew of the transmission because most assuredly it is part of the design.
So difficult to process that.
Just think about all the kids being exposed to shedding if all the teachers are getting boosters now. Maybe it’s a good thing that schools get shut down for a while.
Agreed
I’ve heard of that but for some reason I don’t think it happens with all. My son dated a gal and he was around her a lot during her jabs. I was concerned but nothing happened.
She probably got the placebo.
A placebo instead of the real thing? How did you hear about this?
There are scientists outs there saying that there are saline placebos with the covid label on the vial, and I've wondered with some of my patients having NO reaction AT ALL to either injection if maybe they got those...but then weeks or months later, like everyone else who's injected, they come up with 'unexplained' inflammatory issues in their body.
All I'm saying is that it's possible that some of these vials are in fact NOT whatever is in the covid injections...and could be placebo...but then again, maybe they just didn't react to the injection at the time. There are so many unknowns we're dealing with here.
As I remember there was at least one doctor who got ahold of five vials of one of the "vaccines", I think from the same batch, and tested them. Two of the vials had only saline solution in them. I'm pretty sure there were some other cases where people found vials that had only saline in them. Until then, the idea that some shots were placebos was just a theory, but this seems to confirm it. If this example is representative, that would suggest 2/5ths of the jabs, at least initially, were placebos.
Yes, it's hard to find this sort of information out there, and when we do, it's just a handful of scientists (or usually just 1-2) doing this research. It never makes it to the mainstream news (why would it?!?!). I also worry about the longevity of the lives of the people doing this testing!! But when it doesn't make to the mainstream media (which is being carefully monitored), who cares if the Truth is out there, right? The only people watching it and reading about it are people like us, who have at least SOME idea of what is really going on.
The worrying thing is, if up to 2/5ths of a batch are causing this amount of adverse reactions & deaths (and yes, some batches might be worse than others as other research seems to have shown), what would happen if ALL injections were 'full strength'...? The mind boggles, for sure.
But we have to remember - the madness driving this comes not from sane people like you or I. It comes from psychopaths, sociopaths, narcissists, megalomaniacs, and any other words you want to insert here! They care not about the little minions of the world. The lab workers at Big Pharma are 'just doing their job' and most people just 'follow the rules'.
The only reason this covid crap is upon us NOW is because there is finally the technological know-how/ability to perform a full-scale attack on the people of the world.
Welcome to WWIII, people!
About placebos...
If some are, wouldn't the purpose of them to be to measure the difference from the other biotechnology? That would not be possible if the batches had a mixture of some real and some placebo.
Another thought is a percentage, say 20%, is left placebo because there will be a need for some "healthy" people to keep the "ghost in the machine" operating for a time.
Or maybe the pharma companies are unable to actually produce the fully-toxic vexxation due to it's elements being either difficult to obtain or create for the entire globe at one time...
I'm just trying to noodle it out... which, when one is their level of diabolical is more challenging.
Dunno if there’s “proof” like in many claims tday, but I know our local LtG did a show n tell booster after long time advertising he didn’t need any shots since he had the virus. Just don’t think he’d risk his health, so did fake jab.
Nah. That's just as bad as the other. Look up Terrain theory and keep an eye on what goes into your stomach, exercise and if its winter make sure you have your vitamin D daily.
Here in Seattle the schools are closed Friday due to staffing shortages. I've lived here for 35 years and this has never happened before.
And they're trying to explain it away by blaming it on teachers taking an extra long holiday weekend. Funny, I always remembered teachers I knew having their last minute vacation denied when there weren't available substitutes.
"We have to vaccinate everybody so we can keep schools open."
*Vaccinates all the teachers, bad reactions close schools.*
LMAO.
Watch Booster Day become a federal holiday where all schools are closed for a day every 4 months. 🤦♀️
I am retired and sub teach. My public school here in VA just required the shot for all staff. We part ways in January and they will be short another sub.
And it is their loss :(
I’m just waiting for the media to tell us how this is really a good thing for our children and the teachers alike and it means the injection is working so well and the kids will be better-protected and silly you for thinking this is bad in any way. Oh wait, never mind. They won’t say a word about this.
It continually amazes me that the same people who who are fraidy-cats about getting covid and getting sick without vaccines don't appear to be in the least bit worried about the vaccines themselves making them sick! Disconnect, anyone?
CMCM, that’s exactly right—disconnect, doublethink, and cognitive dissonance are the hallmarks of Covidianism!
Maybe just not enough people read '1984'...or if they did, they thought: "It's just a story"...
So excruciatingly true—although I’m beginning to believe most of these people don’t READ, period. And they’d be hard-pressed to tell you who Orwell even is.
Let alone that Orwell was only his pen name!
Thinking is just faux pas, daahling...
*lol* That would *really* confuse them!
His other famous book, Animal Farm, has a wonderful passage about the cat which I shall reproduce here in honor of our host:
“And the behaviour of the cat was somewhat peculiar. It was soon noticed that when there was work to be done the cat could never be found. She would vanish for hours on end, and then reappear at meal-times, or in the evening after work was over, as though nothing had happened. But she always made such excellent excuses, and purred so affectionately, that it was impossible not to believe in her good intentions.” (p. 12) 😺
One of my favorite quotes from AF!!
they can watch the movie on Amazon Prime Video now.
They'd find it too boring, I fear 🙄
You're absolutely right on the mark....a great many simply DO NOT READ. Not anything. They are utterly clueless about a lot of what is going on.
Or more insidiously, as some smart asses have noted, believed it a training manual 🙂
Or "The Children's Story...but not just for children" by James Clavell. Copyright 1963.
It begins..."the teacher was afraid. And the children were afraid. All except Johnny. He watched the classroom door with hate. He felt the hatred deep within his stomach. It gave him strength."
It's about a 20 minute read.
I found the PDF at archive.org for anyone who’s interested: https://ia800402.us.archive.org/5/items/TheChildrensStory-ButNotJustForChildren_224/tcs.pdf
I haven’t had a chance to read it yet, but the children’s book format can be very disarming and may permit a little truth slip to through the brainwashing, as several attested regarding my fairy tale (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/the-vapor-the-hot-hat-and-the-witches), which was also written for adults and children alike.
Wow, that sounds fantastic. Thanks for the rec, Amy!
don't think they believe the hundreds or thousands or millions of stories of vaxxx injured people, "rare" breakthrough cases, and deaths. brainwashed cats, heads full of catnip.
I think they don’t believe the numbers because they are fine, the people they know are fine so it’s all fine.
Frustrating.
They're not fine though. Every injectee I know has had some weird health issue since getting the shot. Most of them refuse to make the connection.
And even when I point out the potential connection, it still takes a while for it to sink in...and that's ONLY if they've been feeling like rubbish for a while. If it's a smaller problem, not life-threatening, or totally zapping their energy levels for months, then they just pass it off. Getting through to people whose minds are closed is REALLY REALLY HARD!!!! And really frustrating!
Double agreed!
Agreed
Same here. A lot have small issues right now, tinnitus, myalgia, one’s husband has a heart arrhythmia, tingling in hands. No one wants to hear that it’s the vax. It’s like they are putting their hands over their hears and saying nononono like little kids. Yet, they are all getting the boosters. It’s CRAZY!
Good point!
big bird said so, it must be good, right, ugh, and Walensky agreed with the yellow bird, too, plus $100 incentives for the kids, and told they are super heroes ... Steve Kirsch asks how come no one can explain why 14 kids died during the trials
Horrifying. Let's hope that what is predicted doesn't come true as so-called "parents" rush their children aged 5 - 11 down to get the EXPERIMENTAL shot!
Wow. First all the healthcare workers quit because they don't want to be poisoned. Then airlines have to ground their machines due to pilots either too sick to fly or quit. Now school closed because too many poisoned teachers...
Our private school had to go remote last February because too many teachers were out sick from their 2nd shots.
Or you mean third.
That means it's working...
Can't get the virus if the shot kills you first
I've long maintained that the Vaccine is the best diagnostic tool created to spot and eliminate all cause frailty some of which would include Covid susceptibility. Its a genius way to show people who might have died from Covid, but we ensured a peaceful death first.
Seems likely, but the signal for such an effect is hard to make out, since the vaccine was preceded by the virus which probably already calibrated "pending" deaths to below-trend levels.
"Can't get the virus if the shot kills you first" - checkmate virus!
LOL
And this is part of the reason why we home school our children now!
1. They'll actually GET an education
2. They'll get a proper, well-rounded education
3. They'll be healthy whilst they learn (no masks, no experimental injections, no hanging around sick, injected people etc)
Best part is that they are FAR happier being home schooled! Sure, it's way more work for my poor hubby, and especially me, but this is the next generation: we need to take care of them and keep them safe, and I mean that in its truest form, not the way the govt says they'll 'keep you safe'...
I wish I could hit the "like" button a million times: you and your hubby are doing the best thing for your children!!! 💖💖💖
Thanks so much DebMG :-)
If you'd seen what happened with not just the school down the road, but how our state education system is run (I'm in Australia) you'd know there was no other option!
I can only imagine: things are also quite grim here in Canada.
Public health doctors (who have all turned into media whores) are trying to outdo each other on the doom and gloom and the school boards lap it up. I've seen children wearing masks outside during recess (school is across the street), I makes me want to weep.
You've just described a "purity spiral." Like everything else in the universe, there is s a Wikipedia article about it.
Wow, I've never heard of that term, but it absolutely nails it in describing what's going on around us.
Especially when you consider that the oxygen deprivation from mask-wearing in children may negatively affect their brain development....
I think is even more than that. I think forcing kids to be behind a mask all day will ultimately cause mental issues like fear, paranoia, anxiety, depression etc. Time will tell unfortunately.
...not to mention the adults around them existing in a state of mass psychosis...
These people are teaching the youth of America and were dumb enough to not only take the first two Phase III trial experimental serum(s), they went long on the third and totally un-tested-not-even-in-any-phase-trial experimental serum. Trust the plan.
"they went long on the third and totally un-tested-not-even-in-any-phase-trial experimental serum" - possibly mix and matching as they did so.
Thank you for that comment. Wry amusement: on the one hand, Big Brother ignores old standards (rigorous testing), changes them (e.g. PCR test), OK's drugs (upon what research?) or modifications of their uses: e.g. authorize boosters when these were never tested, for cohorts never in what passed for formal Phase 3 trials (e.g. pregnant women, kids 5-11, and ?? ), advocates mix & match of different products and who knows what other malarkey. Then they are annoyed when us Proles are self-medicating with "horse dewormer," snorting iodine and hydrogen peroxide, or what have you.
Maybe the muddling mix-n-match is a fail safe in case they can't, after all, sufficiently eliminate the control group.
What I don’t get: don’t ppl on tge Left love their kids also? Surely they must. And let’s face it: there are so many questions surrounding vaccine and kids, school closures and kids, masking and kids. Remember alar and apples? Distrust of corporate entities used to be a leftist thing. I don’t get it. I actually suspect many more of them than will admit it share our doubts.
I believe that this has become a weird cultish religion. I am a Christian and no one could change my mind about my beliefs no matter what they did and how much they tried to convince me. The same thing applies to these indoctrinated people. Once it becomes a "religion" to them it's nearly impossible to reverse. Horrifying.
The political ideologies have flip flopped. Left is now pro-law and order, at least as far as enforcing mandates are concerned, and the right is now extremely vocal about my body my choice.
Main Street Democrats are just now starting to realize they are the party of Wall Street, "Lockdown" corporations such as Wal-Mart and Amazon, the party of the media, the party of endless war........
I'm so far left that I can't stomach Democrats, and totally distrust corporations and authoritarian governments. I don't recognize the left anymore. Here's something I wrote today:
It seems clear that Trump Derangement Syndrome has had a profound effect on the brains of Democrats. I think it irreversibly activated the reptilian parts of their brains. That results in an inability to think clearly on subjects that activate. The condition makes cognitive dissonance intolerable. Hence, the aggression towards the unvaxxed. I don't see that anything can be done about it.
I despair that people refer to this as a booster.
Dose 3 in a never ending series would be more honest.
If 1& 2 haven't done the trick, why keep going?
It's a bit like the obsession with testing children in school which plagued the latter years of my teaching career. The mentality of politicians being: 'If we keep measuring them- they'll do better'.
If they just keep rolling out boosters, but gradually reduce the "active ingredient' until it's all saline, they be able to declare victory when herd immunity is finally allowed to ensue.
THAT is a future I could cope with better. Although the damage will still have been done by then.
But you think it'll gradually morph into a saline solution...??! Ha ha ha! I don't think thought processes like this ever see the light of day in the brainwaves of the psychopaths behind all this covid crap...
I'm not sure I buy the "saline" conspiracy theory. Like many conjectures, it is possible, but is it probable? In the first place, adulterating medications or even mislabeling is at least sometimes a serious felony. If they were going to flout such laws, at the least, they would probably experiment with different formulations and covertly track the results using computerized medical records.
And then a new virus!
I wish!
Testing has its uses. But at least applied to schools, the goal is to to find someone to blame. This of course, is usually the teachers. Children under-performing? Must be the teachers' fault. Violence and disorder in the halls? Must be the teachers' fault. Consideration of other causative factors is usually discouraged, at least by anyone that wishes to keep their job.
You’re right, it’s not a booster. It’s the same liability free shot as the first two. The only one that has been approved and has liability is Comirnaty and that one has not been released yet. If it ever will.
Is there a link between 'Comirnaty' and Pfizer?
1) If there is then I presume that the parent company will claim the same 'You can't blame me' rights.
2) If the two aren't linked, the same lack of time constraints of insufficient time for proper completion of clinical trials will still apply.
Definitely not a "booster" in the usual sense. Rather, it appears to be just another SHOT (not vaccine). Maybe the mentality is now "If we just keeping shooting up everyone, maybe the shot will eventually work".
No, the mentality is "get them hooked on endless boosters, so we can roll out the vaxx passports." And then the "social credit" system. https://postlmg.cc/BXykMy0T
this is exactly the plan.....
"is “booster day” the new snow day?" Indeed as "bad weather" becomes the pseudonym for mandated inflicted disaster. #LetsGoBrandon
Those teacher absences just mean the booster is working as intended.
Dr McClaough (sp) says getting covid your one and down.
So the jab can make you sick and it doesn’t keep you from getting covid so they stand a chance getting really sick twice. Sounds good.
He gave a great talk at the Florida Covid Symposium last week, and indeed says one-and-done. You don't need, or want, to add a dose of spike protein to another dose. He also says once you catch Covid, don't test anymore. This just clouds the picture and feeds the narrative of doom.
Note that the power brokers need neither test nor shot. The construction industry runs our state — both the economy and the politicians. Their mandates are none. And the politicos and staff need not vax. Ppl — why do you not think enough red flags?
You have to make yourself sick with the jab so you MAYBE don't get sick later with the bug.
It's science.
wow, thank you, just saw this. no, we had snow days back in the day, not a huge amount of sick teachers. everywhere that there has been mass vaccinations, a large number, Vermont, other countries, suddenly, yeah sure right, a whole lot of people are filling up the hospitals and the miscreants cannot figure out why that is. from the weather, the air, the water, the boosters.
It’s the unvaccinated. When in doubt, it is always the unvaccinated 🙄
I’ve heard from nurses that will come forward that the hospitals are filled with vaccine injured folks. Definitely not the unvaxxed.
My daughter was an elementary teacher for 11 years (before she decided to go into nursing). Every single year beginning in about October, kids started getting sick and then teachers usually got sick too.
"A fully vaccinated plane passenger, 51, was infected with coronavirus and found dead in his seat on Pegasus Airlines Flight 1043 from Istanbul, Turkey, to Hamburg, Germany."
What if you were flying on a plane with a fully boosted person who died mid-flight and the government said that the post mortem report cannot contain Covid because flying with covid is not allowed which is why the vaccine is mandated. They couldn't have died from the vaccine, because they are safe and effective.
So we are thinking about creating a new category of death - "Not Covid or Covid Vaccine" Death.
Apparently, they have a way to measure these types of death in UK and they appear to be 10x for single vs double dosed.
See prof. Norman Fenton's Analysis from All-cause Mortality data.
https://twitter.com/profnfenton/status/1456403059983196164?s=20
Can someone with the expert knowledge tell me why the single dose of the vaccine is allowing itself to be found in the dead bodies of people at 10 times the rate its finding itself in bodies of double dosed?
I don't know much about Fenton's work but it seems like he's being confusing on purpose.
"1st dose mortality rates" don't start to climb until week 20+, right where his chart begins, as the elderly who are not in health crisis get their 2nd dose, reducing the denominator until those who had a reason not to get the second dose are left in that group - including, of course, those whose reason was "health crisis." If he showed the rates before the "not in crisis" elderly were selected out of the 1st dose group, the per-100k rates would be quite lower.
It isn't much different for the "unvaccinated" elderly except the selection bias (removal of the healthy elderly from the denominator) probably takes effect many weeks earlier.
But I don't know where Fenton is getting the age breakdown, I only see all ages by cvax status at https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datalist
Discrepancies and inconsistencies in UK Government datasets compromise accuracy of mortality rate comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated
Martin Neil, Norman Fenton and Scott McLachlan Queen Mary, University of London, UK
27 October 2021
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/10/comparing-all-cause-mortality-rate-by.html
After he wrote that and told ONS to release the age stratified raw data for all cause mortality they promised him they would and they did. Except they released it stratified only for population over 60. And everyone from 10-59 was clubbed together. You can guess why.
http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~norman/papers/inconsistencies_vaccine.pdf
Here's the deaths by Vaccination Status for England. They estimate it's about 85% of the deaths.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/file?uri=%2fpeoplepopulationandcommunity%2fbirthsdeathsandmarriages%2fdeaths%2fdatasets%2fdeathsbyvaccinationstatusengland%2fdeathsoccurringbetween2januaryand24september2021/datasetfinalcorrected2.xlsx
Important to note: The data excludes the most crucial periods. The beginning of vaccination on December 8 2020 when most of the elderly died within a few days after vaccination, and the booster period which started recently and where 1 dose deaths with covid started to compare poorly with unvaccinated as well.
Prof. Fenton basically showed that the assumptions
1) the denominators are accurate
2) All cause mortality and covid mortality for vaccinated is lower for over vaccinated in over 60s only
3) Vaccine causes no harm
cannot all be true, if a single dose is killing faster than no dose.
So the denominators must be wrong (his contention is that the vaccinated are inflated and unvaccinated undercounted)
If we believe the denominators are wrong but in the other direction as the people who disbelieve negative Vaccine Effectiveness suggest, then Prof. Clare Craig shows that it would imply negative infection rates in vaccinated or completely test evading variant/non-testing or 7.5m vaccinated just disappearing. She contends all those are impossibilities so the VE cannot be 90 or whatever claimed in the new UKHSA report especially if the want to claim protection from severe disease and death as using ONS denominators would imply very fast killing in the 80+ which is by far the most at risk.
In short, they are both trying to suggest that something is wrong with the denominators and that the denominators are not wrong in the direction the people claiming high Vaccine Effectiveness against infection claim it is. It's in the opposite direction according to some.
https://twitter.com/ClareCraigPath/status/1457966578021044225?s=20
Of course, this is not the only possibility. Since the denominators could be right or wrong and still give us the same answer if we simply look at rates and knowns. So one easy sanity check is only relying on what we can measure. We cannot measure the number of unvaccinated directly but we can measure the vaccinated with some confidence and measure the outcomes of those that move from unvaccinated to vaccinated with 1 dose to vaccinated with 2 doses.
This movement should be population non-specific and if some common risk factor is present then we will see the same relative risk no matter when or where we look.
Prof. Fenton is picking on the single dose to demonstrate that the outrageous rate has to explained. It's not expected that the rate of death of upon starting a treatment regime will be substantially higher than before or after the treatment regimen while also claiming its safe.
It's not specific to England. You look at Scotland's latest PHS report and you find the same effect even when they club the 1 dosed within 21 days to unvaccinated. The same effect in Singapore where the partially vaccinated dying faster than vaccinated. Same in many other jurisdictions.
I can link if someone wants to see the reports.
"In three of the last four weeks’, age-standardised mortality rates for COVID-19 deaths shown in Table 20 are lower for people who have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine compared to individuals that are unvaccinated or have received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
In the last week, age-standardised mortality rates for COVID-19 deaths are similar for people who have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine compared to individuals that are unvaccinated or have received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, however the confidence intervals for the unvaccinated age-standardised mortality rates are wide. In the last week, the mean age of unvaccinated individuals with a confirmed COVID-19 related death was 71.5 years old, whereas the mean age of individuals that received 2 doses of vaccine and had a confirmed COVID-19 related death was 77.5 years old."
They are literally having to explain just like UKHSA why vaccinated are dying faster per 100,000. page 47 Table 20. https://www.publichealthscotland.scot/media/9994/21-11-03-covid19-publication_report.pdf
Singapore did something worse. Removed data because it didn't fit their narrative. I wrote about it here: https://almostwrong.substack.com/p/censorship-is-not-going-to-get-us/comments
My basic point is that the effect is real and not a local statistical anomaly. The fact that ONS UK wouldn't release the age stratified data for 60 and under should give people a clue as to what's happening. All cause in this aggregate is higher for vaccinated. Why? and which group? And when?
The answers to those questions have been published independently by the UK government reports. Let's just say - the hospitalization rate after the 1st dose for people under 60 increases non-linearly.
And we know the most vulnerable elderly already died within days to weeks of the start of the vaccination campaign so their deaths won't be counted in the dataset they released making the averages look even more suspicious. You'd have to explain why the covid vaccines are saving people from dying of any cause unless you believe that this group is systematically lower risk (making comparisons with vaccinated impossible) or if the method of protection is more along the lines of depletion of susceptibles before the counting begins (AKA all V.E. protocol for Covid Vaccines, never start counting until everyone who can die or recover from the vaccine has already died or recovered)
I don't disagree that the denominator for the unvaccinated is unreliable.
I still don't understand why the 1st dose data is being rendered so unnecessarily confusing. This is not a controlled experiment, "let's give X 60 year old volunteers only 1 dose and see how they fare." Fenton and co, by your description, seem to be willfully pretending that this is the case. In real life plenty of "only 1 dose" recipients are still alive and kicking - which is exactly why they went on to have a 2nd dose, leaving those who had health complications in the "only 1 dose" cohort.
They are not pretending, they are showing the data. Plenty of people were given a single dose and they waited 12 weeks to their second. These people shouldn't die faster than people who got no dose. There is no way around this.
Scotland data shows same. If it cannot be established that a single dose is safe, then there is no point of talking about the safety of the second.
The safety of the second *is* the safety of the first. You can't have the second without having the first. Looking at "only" first, after most of the population has moved on to the second, creates selection bias for ill health. That's all.
In that case the safety of the Covid disease is better than the vaccine in people under 60. Since most people with Covid disease appear to have fared better in all cause.
I don't buy this logic, but it follows from your assertion.
Do you mean the booster? Or dose 1?
All cause mortality data is not available by booster in UK death data yet. However until before the boosters from Jan 2 to September 24th they found all-cause death in people under 60 to be 2x unvaccinated. In the 60-69 age group like others over 60, the consistent pattern was seen where someone getting a single dose was dying of any cause at a rate almost 10 times that of people who made it to the double dose.
In other words. The UK is covering up the age stratified deaths in people in under 60, and where they are not covering it up, we see that the unvaccinated have a lower risk of death than those that chose to get vaccinated but couldn't make it to their second.
So, if you are confident that you won't die in your first dose, then yes, your second dose might protect you from deaths of all causes compared to the unvaccinated in people over 60.
This actually really just proves 1 thing and 1 thing only: The people who are vaccinated repeatedly only have a better mortality than those who chose not to vaccinate in that age group not because the vaccine protected them from covid, but because the vaccine filters people who will be able to survive it. Meaning, the vaccine didn't protect you, you protected you, and gave credit to the vaccine because it didn't kill you yet.
This one is tricky to analyze, because if you die after your first shot you never make it to the second. So those who get two are somehow hardier. For now anyway.
Thank you for explaining this so clearly.
I've not explained something far more critical and decisive yet because I've noticed that people are not emotionally ready for it, but I will explain it in a few months when the evidence will be undeniable and the anomalous deaths start piling up in people who were double vaccinated or recovered and young.
The specific case of the mid-flight death of a 51 year old double vaccinated who was SARS-COV-2 negative at boarding, without symptoms but dropped dead at 20,000 ft should give pause to people who are overconfident about this insidious problem we are facing. Here's a clue about what one should know before declarative statements about the causality of covid vaccines and sudden covid positivity at death. I wish I could make pronouncements now but I cannot because I don't have the data to prove something is happening but I believe we will see something very odd soon with the speed at which we are interfering with children's immune system. We will see a tsunami.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00016/full
"Latent herpes virus reactivation has been demonstrated in astronauts during shuttle (10–16 days) and International Space Station (≥180 days) flights. Following reactivation, viruses are shed in the body fluids of astronauts. Typically, shedding of viral DNA is asymptomatic in astronauts regardless of mission duration; however, in some cases, live/infectious virus was recovered by tissue culture that was associated with atopic-dermatitis or skin lesions during and after spaceflight. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axes activation during spaceflight occurs as indicated by increased levels of stress hormones including cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. These changes, along with a decreased cell mediated immunity, contribute to the reactivation of latent herpes viruses in astronauts. Currently, 47/89 (53%) astronauts from shuttle-flights and 14/23 (61%) astronauts from ISS missions shed one or more herpes viruses in saliva/urine samples. Astronauts shed Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and herpes-simplex-1 (HSV-1) in saliva and cytomegalovirus (CMV) in urine. Larger quantities and increased frequencies for these viruses were found during spaceflight as compared to before or after flight samples and their matched healthy controls. The shedding did not abate during the longer ISS missions, but rather increased in frequency and amplitude. These findings coincided with the immune system dysregulation observed in astronauts from shuttle and ISS missions. VZV shedding increased from 41% in space shuttle to 65% in ISS missions, EBV increased 82 to 96%, and CMV increased 47 to 61%. In addition, VZV/CMV shed ≤30 days after ISS in contrast to shuttle where VZV/CMV shed up to 5 and 3 days after flight respectively. Continued shedding of infectious-virus post-flight may pose a potential risk for crew who may encounter newborn infants, sero-negative adults or any immunocompromised individuals on Earth. Therefore, developing spaceflight countermeasures to prevent viral reactivation is essential. Our spaceflight-developed technologies for saliva collection/rapid viral detection have been extended to include clinical applications including zoster patients, chicken pox, post-herpetic neuralgia, multiple sclerosis, and various neurological disorders. These protocols are employed in various clinics and hospitals including the CDC and Columbia University in New York, as well as overseas in Switzerland and Israel."
So space travel is stressful on the body.
But are you saying that we should expect to see all sorts of reactivation of previous illnesses in people having the covid injections? That something (potentially latent) they have in their system will play up? And are you suggesting that it could be not just EBV, CMV, HSV etc as mentioned above, but also previous problems like cancer, diverticulitis, heart conditions, disc (spinal) problems, headaches, sinus issues, allergies etc...?
I'm already noticing that almost all my patients who have had covid injections have had adverse reactions of one sort or another, often delayed by 3-6 months, but sometimes happening (very) soon after the injection. Sometimes they're minor issues, but definitely a deviation from that patient's 'normal'. Easier to see if you've been treating them for many years: you have a better gauge of what is 'normal' for that patient. But sometimes the issues are quite serious. The body is hardy, but things catch up with us eventually.
I can see, at least anecdotally, that things are a-changing. I have read many science papers and it confirms changes I am seeing in my clinic. The future DOES look grim. I think you should reconsider our emotional readiness and put your thoughts on the table, AlmostWrong. We need to be as awake as possible to survive our future, and if people can steel themselves against what is to happen, then that sounds good in my books! I also practice astrology (have done since I was 10 years old!) so I'm able to look into the crystal ball a bit, shall we say? But one can just be good at solving puzzles and assimilating information to also see what is currently happening. Being good at science and understanding human nature + economics helps!
So...want to share your views some more? :-)
Thanks for sharing. My fear is that speaking too soon may jeopardize our collective efforts to end this pandemic, because without convincing proof, I may not be able to persuade anyone to force their local officials to do specific tests or release specific data. And since most of these conversations are monitored by people in the know, they maybe able to pickup on what we are discussing and send people to sabotage to misdirect discussion to irrelevancies. I once posted an analysis of the raw data from a paper that showed something uncomfortable for the vaccinated. Within 2 days of my posting my analysis of the raw numbers, that file was literally deleted from the University Website. There was no good reason given except the new dataset contained fewer datapoints and made the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated such that they appeared identical. This was not the case in the original dataset and it looked worse for vaccinated. Similarly, you might be aware of Project Salus VE results from DOD following the over 65 cohort in the US which was abruptly removed because it didn't show what they claimed it would show all summer.
When they keep removing information that as you said are small pieces of the puzzle, it becomes increasingly difficult to near impossible to make a case without referencing "secret knowledge". In science, nothing should be secret but if they keep deleting stuff thats highly relevant to the pandemic and there is no way to get them to reproduce it, people will have to take me at my word that something I am showing is the real dataset and not manipulated. For example, I do have the dataset saved with the CT values, infectious viral culture titers and symptom onset data from the Wisconsin study in breakthrough cases. But why would someone believe an anon account's analysis if the original is missing from the website? They shouldn't.
Which is why I've decided I will try to figure out everything end to end, present it all at once so that if it's wrong, it can be easily evaluated. If it's not wrong, then someone can follow the evidence to build on it and hopefully get authorities to look at the data and explain why the scenario presented can be dismissed.
But telling people what can't be demonstrated (yet) will do nothing to convince anyone but will give those that are worried that publicly available data can be used to show the impact of the health campaign is disastrous will swiftly move to remove those clues. We cannot afford more censorship right now, because the people who we trusted to do their jobs are not capable anymore.
But to your first question: Notice these stories:
"Fifty-two passengers on one flight from Delhi to Hong Kong test positive for coronavirus after landing - despite ALL presenting a negative test while boarding"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9512239/Fifty-two-passengers-one-flight-Delhi-Hong-Kong-test-positive-Covid-19-landing.html
And this Vaccine Efficacy Result From Qatar Study: -75% after 6 months for travelers often flying.
Page 26: Table s10
https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2114114/suppl_file/nejmoa2114114_appendix.pdf
This is pointing to something more general than space flight - Rapid changes in (Atmospheric) pressure likely leads to immune regulatory failures. Does it have any implications for people who are doing anything that involves rapid changes in pressure like diving into a swimming pool? Can medications help here?
Why did so many pilots die? https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-unsubstantiated-claims-follow-deaths-of-british-and-indian-airline-pilots/
This is only a small part of the puzzle.
yes, Covid vaccines can cause reactivation for other viruses the most well known one is Herpes Zoster but young people have died with antibodies to Chickenpox too. https://www.change.org/p/health-minister-post-vaccination-mis-a-awareness-and-antibody-testing-required?redirect=false
I’ll be interested in what you say when you can say it.
Let's hope I have the evidence and the understanding sooner than they get rid of the data.
EBV is a particularly nasty bug if your immune system is not handling it properly. You will get lymphatic cancer.
CMV only shows itself in people with destroyed immune systems like HIV patients or recently transplanted patients.
The shot must be terrible for the immune system.
And the powers are saying take the flu shot and the booster at the same time. Are the powers nuts? People should know better too. We are so F’ing with our immune systems.
I wonder if this is why airline and military pilots are resisting these shots so hard. Maybe they are aware of the effects of high altitude on their bodies. I have read they are exposed to radiation (x rays? gamma rays?) at those heights regularly.
That might be some of it! https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/covid-boosters-closing-schools/comment/3591783
Oh no
Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156793/Fully-vaccinated-air-passenger-infected-Covid-dead-flight-Turkey-Germany.html
I don't doubt that the booster can cause immediate nasty reactions, but from what my teacher friends tell me about being in the schools this year, they'll do ANYTHING for a sick day. Were they eligible for a free sick day to deal with side effects? Are "vaccine side effects" actually a code for "our teachers needed a break from your kids, who are throwing chairs and cursing at us because they are so broken?"
Australia health minister whining that hospitals overwhelmed with covid cases. The country is 81.5% double vaxxed..so with 18.5 % un-vaxxed, dispersed across the country, it’s unlikely hospitals being overwhelmed by un-jabbed. The interesting party…the narrative for pandemics of the vaxxed across the globe are now coy by using “covid cases” rather than “breakthrough.” Wait for it to happen in the US. Saginaw committed an egregious crime of truth.
They can't help themselves, they just have to keep the narrative of the unvaxxed going. I just read an article in my local paper written by a prominent local doctor. He stated yet again that all the local "case spread" was due to the unvaxxed and that you get far BETTER immunity from vaccines than from the natural immunity of having had Covid. Aggghhhhhh!
During 1968 flu they had to close my school for a week. Not to keep people “safe,” but because most were too sick to attend. I, my sister and 56 yo mother all pulled through.
If I recall correctly, in 1968 The Science was still functioning properly.
Everything changed with 1986 Vaccine Modernization Act waiving all liability for harm.
And then in 69 they had Woodstock and it became iconic, especially for the left. Now it would be banned in blue states and labeled a superspreader if a red state held it.
I live in the Denver area, and there are 4 different school districts that are closing school on Friday and maybe longer due to a shortage of teachers. Some regular teachers are sick or out for other reasons, and there are not enough subs to fill in.
The black flag flies in many different colors. Find yours today.
On the other hand, teachers are always happy to get a day off, so consider the incentives for them to exaggerate or fabricate the reaction to the jab.
My son in Michigan just graduated college and plans on substitute teaching for a year until returning for master’s degree to obtain certification. He’s finally getting fingerprinted and background checked (his dad updated me). He stupidly voluntarily jabbed so they’ll love him subbing.
He still isn’t calling me back or texting. He was mad before I wouldn’t get vaxxed, don’t believe it’s safe, and wish he hadn’t gotten vaxxed, and now just won’t bother talking with me. He’s mad I didn’t want him to get Gardasil either. I’m not anti vax, just anti new vaxxes.
Taiwan halts 2nd-dose BioNTech vaccinations for ages 12-17 amid concerns of myocarditis
CECC says approval of COVID vaccines for children under 12 will not be considered until 2nd dose issue settled
This crap is just unbelievable. Aside from the truly bad side effects, everyone I know who has had it has had flu-like symptoms for a day or two. I was in the military and travelled to 3rd world countries with the US government. I've had every damn shot in the book, including flu every year, and never once have I had ANY side effects. There is clearly something wrong with these and it's been obvious from the start.
Chicago public schools are closed tomorrow so students can get the poison jab.
They are hiring substitute teachers in MI, there is indeed a shortage...but also requiring the shot, of course. I think if you're in retirement age and don't want to take unnecessary risks you can pull the plug. Or take some time off until the "coast clears."
Never saw anything like that before in my years in schools. Vacine mak me helth?
Ah, is you again Mon. Go back to de Island! 😎
Suddenly I feel safe flying only Southwest (if, you know, I can find a flight that is running).
The honesty does seem surprising, but I like to think it is the beginning of the undeniability of this Crime Against Humanity. After all, while "they" want it to be so, everyone is not complicit in it.
There was also a moderately publicized call for a WORLD WIDE walkout 8-11 Nov. Could be civil disobedience. Given that we are talking about teachers though, I doubt it.
Love the train wreck photo - good for a laugh.
Good one - crop of con artists.