have regulators been pushing the wrong vaccines?
Denmark also shot down the masks and vaccine passports. Democrats will now ban danishes from menus to fight this dangerous misinformation.
When it walks like a gigantic global conspiracy and talks like a gigantic global conspiracy it's ... transphobic racist paranoia to identify it as a gigantic global conspiracy.
More seriously, the reason none of this is discussed is probably a mixture of the covidians tripling down on the sanctity of their sacrament, and the Machiavellians understanding full well that admitting they were this wrong and this mendacious would end with literal heads on literal pikes. Since they control corporate, state, and media power, they don't have to admit anything. So they don't.
I find it odd to say the least that AZ & JNJ reduce CV deaths given they, like all four c19 agents, induce thromboembolic events.
I’d be interested to hear Prof Norman Fenton’s review of the way the clinical information has been used here.
There have been claims in the past with these agents which turn out not to be true & arose from data fraud.
Isn’t it interesting that other countries are doing the work that the United States just won’t do? I am so disappointed in the USA right now. Joe Biden is a complete fraud.
What troubles me most is, why the worldwide coercion to vaccinate? It's one thing to make this garbage available to everyone who wants it, but to force people, under threats of dismissal and loss of freedoms, is unconscionable.
If someone wants to proffer an innocent explanation for this, I'd love to hear it. As it stands, I remain at Defcon 2 until further notice.
The biggest fraud in history might be the medical industrial complex.
Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in deaths from all infectious diseases, decreasing to relatively minor levels by the early 1900s. The history of that transformation involves famine, poverty, filth, lost cures, eugenicist doctrine, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests over vaccine refusal, and more. We are told that medical interventions increased our lifespan and single-handedly prevented mass death.
Vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. For the past 100 year or more "modern medicine" has been claiming credit for things that builders, sewerage workers, water treatment plants, gutter designers, roofers, fridge inventors, electricians etc have created.
The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.
The more of these poisons you pump into your body, the closer you are to your doom. Not from any fake "Covid", but from your immune system crashing into dust. Those spiky little proteins get into your blood and destroy your cells and also wreck the protective layer inside your main arteries that helps create nitric oxide for your blood.
As I think you know- there was no pandemic- it was murder. Several hundred thousand (mainly elderly) were killed through the forced procedures of Remdesivir/Fentanyl/Ventilators done in the US/Brazil/Peru etc. and forced procedures of Midazolam/Morphine in the UK/France/Italy etc.
This is one hell of an article and one hell of a study. The conclusions have been anecdotally known for some time now, but to see it quantified like this is infuriating and seems to be totally indicative of corruption within the government agencies charged with ensuring the safety of the public.
People have literally forgotten that they were duped into this with the unequivocal promise that the shot would prevent illness and transmission. Rachel Maddow said this verbatim: "The virus stops with every vaccinated person… A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot use that person to go anywhere else.”
Well, at least I didn’t get the 3rd shot :( … been a year since I had my second … wish I didn’t fall for the whole “it will stop transmission” bullshit
J and J and AZ both have caused way too many thrombotic events of all kinds, including clots in the lungs, ovarian veins, liver, brain, deep veins in the legs, heart, etc to EVER be considered “better” in any way, shape, or form. All of these formulations were not ready for prime-time release. These viral vectored vaccines were banned in many countries for younger age groups due to the high risk of thrombotic events. Never, ever, forget that.
Hmmm… so the same people who touted the precautionary principle as a justification for draconian Covid restrictions completely ignored that principle when it came to mRNA vaccines?
“Using the precautionary principle requires that products be rigorously tested before reaching the market. This can be both time consuming and expensive, so one way companies work around this is to put out products with only minimal testing and then recall products that turn out to be unsafe. This approach is much like a criminal trial - the technology or product is innocent until proven guilty.
“The benefit of using this approach is that new technologies and products can reach the market faster and cost less to produce because of the limited testing. The problem with this approach is that the effects of the products are unknown until the product is proven 'guilty.' Products that are unsafe can have short-term and long-term effects on human and environmental health, and giving consumers access before these effects are known is a risky gamble.
“The precautionary principle is based on the opposite assumption - that products and technologies are guilty until proven innocent. The idea is that products need to be thoroughly tested to fully understand any harm they may do, and not allow these products to reach the market until that time.”
Gottlieb you say? "Scott Gottlieb (born June 11, 1972) is an American physician and investor..." The investor? no way he'd capture regulatory authority and try to exploit and capitalize on any of that for his own gains? Do Bill Gates next.
People are still suffering from clotting and other cardiovascular issues from the JnJ vax. My 19 y.o.'s doctor is pushing this jab as safe and effective. It's taken me over 12 months to talk her out of the "ledge". The mandates of all these new vaccines is criminal considering all the previously healthy people who have suffered severe AEs including death. The feds and blue states are going after our your adults on a 24/7 campaign of misinformation. It's infuriating to see, and exhausting to save our kids from it.
Those who are about to die, CoVid salutes you.
Given that the people who die /by/to/with/from CoVid are maxed out on life expectancy, or in a parlous state of health, vaccination could serve only to increase slightly the time spent in God’s waiting room, so it is not surprising the mRNA happy juice has had no overall effect on mortality reduction.
Plenty of data now showing all-cause mortality has averaged out to the same levels as previous years’ averages, due to deaths being displaced, so overall CoVid has caused no additional deaths. If there are no additional deaths, the pseudo-vaccines cannot have saved any lives as there were none to save and there is no vaccination against death.
Hasn’t this been the great fudge from Day 1? It’s a discriminating virus targeting a specific, narrow, moribund cohort of relatively small size.
Everything has been an exercise in futility to ‘protect’ the unprotectable, and to ‘protect’ the not at risk. The consequence being the unprotectable died anyway, the not at risk were placed very much at risk from vaccine injury and death, compromised immune systems and other possible future health problems just coming to light. Further booster doses apparently increased risk and hastened deaths across the population. And all at vast cost for no benefit.
In the UK the term for this is an ‘omnishambles’.
Roll up, roll up, get your fourth dose.
I think it was Dr. Peter McCullough (apologies if my memory is off) made the point very early on how strange it was that the Big Regulators were insisting on "vaccination", while not specifying which vaccine to take. They treated them as interchangeable, even though we knew at the time they were all different in important ways.
His point, at the time, was that if you have 4 products there has to be one that has the best safety/efficacy profile. And, if you are coercing people to take "a shot" and allowing them to take a suboptimal one, then you are by definition causing relative harm.
saved them from "covid", but killed them via heart attack .. and pharma laughed all the way to the bank