160 Comments

Here's who's not hiding the data: Walgreens.

Week after week, for those who test through Walgreens, broken down by vax and dose status, they've shown generally dose-dependent greater COVID positivity, or no beneficial effect of the vaccines against COVID positivity.

https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp

See page 3.

Expand full comment

Well, this is what it has come to. A private entity is showing the information where our own government agencies won't...

Expand full comment

The good news is the stacks' have already shredded the bureaucracy before they get to shredding.

Feels good!

Expand full comment

Sage Hana noted this the other day. I like when the all come to the same conclusion:

The Data cannot be Trusted.

Anyone else feel like they are living in an Old Soviet Union movie they used to show

us in school about how horrible it was to live there?

Expand full comment

Yes, I had cited the same series of Walgreens data, as of April 2022, in my book, Neither Safe Nor Effective: The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines

Expand full comment

Yes. Like standing in long lines, on Tuesday's, to get a pair of shoes with two different sizes.

That's what they want.

We're getting close to a REAL insurrection imo

Expand full comment

I'm still waiting for it...my neighbors are way complacent!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 30, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Sooo many things have went south. One knick at a time.

Much of it started under Bush senior

Expand full comment

The take over of 401K plans, pension funds, etc. E. Warren and some other slime in congress have been targeting them for years. Uncle Joe's proposed tracking of any financial transaction over 600 Yankeebux was an audacious move in that direction. This is where our working middle class may finally turn off Netflix and get angry.

Expand full comment

before I retired, I gave economic presentations. everyone always laughed at the chinese data because they knew/assumed it was fake. I always laughed at them because they assumed the u.s. data wasn't.

Expand full comment

I said this about Canada a year and a half ago

Expand full comment

What we used to call "journalism."

Expand full comment

It's always been omissions, half-truths and outright lies to some degree, but never in my lie, er, life (I'm 60) have I seen anything like what the mass media spews these days. Perhaps I take it to an extreme, but I literally approach most "news" these days with the starting assumption that I'm being lied to; the only difficulty is trying to suss out the details and motivations.

Expand full comment

Yes, of course, there's always been that factor. I'm 61. I can say from my own point of view as a former journalist and someone who reads a lot, it's never been like this! During wars, it gets a bit loose... But we've been in nearly constant war since Korea, and after the 70's, or maybe during them, things started going really really downhill. In my opinion. These days, I don't even look at MSM.

Expand full comment

You probably have at least a 70% chance of being right if you assume the truth of the _exact opposite_ of whatever the news says.

Maybe 90%.

Expand full comment

Maybe 100%, depending on the issue? ;)

Expand full comment

This is the kind of visual that ends wars. Notice how after Viet Nam, we in the US were not shown these kinds of things anymore. I remember reading, I think it was an issue of The Atlantic magazine, in which there was a photo of a dead US soldier being dragged through the street in I believe it was Somalia... People wrote in and complained that this photo was published-- No, we don't want to see this stuff-- It ENDS WARS.

Expand full comment

OUR SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED.

This is our #1 issue. We cannot rank anything higher than this issue. It is an issue we can and should all agree on. All political sides and all people.

It is like having a computer that has been hacked and corrupted. When we sit here arguing about hot button issues that is like arguing about what programs run better on the corrupted computer. NONE of them run better. Not until we fix the system. We have to put all of our attention on focusing the ACTUAL SYSTEM first. It's not that hard to do actually. We just need a movement. A decentralized one. And a plan.

What is the solution? Our systems have been corrupted by regulatory capture and special interest groups - we can't expect the system to fix itself. We need a NEW idea. One that makes the old one obsolete.

If our problem is systemic corruption the best cure is radical FORCED TRANSPARENCY.

I beg all of you to read this:

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/what-we-need-is-a-transparency-movement

Expand full comment

I don't see us arguing here... It seems that we're mostly agreeing--

And I agree with you also, we need transparency, absolutely. YES, our systems have been corrupted, and we need to find better means of making sure they cannot be corrupted. Because this problem goes WAY back, and is to do with the fact that we have long allowed those with the most MONEY to buy political power, at least that's how I see it, to be brief.

Right now we're in a situation like nothing we've EVER seen or been in before. I think we need to have more than ONE targeted approach to the more than ONE problem we're dealing with. I'm not clear about what you mean when you say "radical forced transparency..." Revolution? If that's what you mean, I think we'll get that soon enough, whether it's bloody or simply heavily demanded by enough people to bring it. Or both. Because generally speaking, when people realize they've been tricked, they've been harmed, and KILLED, their children killed, sterilized, and the things that are happening now ARE these things... Well, there's gonna be a LOT of rage...

What we have now is Law. We have a LOT of laws, and in my view, we are chasing our tails instead of having the guts to go directly to the issue of MONEY and POWER-- because our laws and our "leadership" is FULL OF MONEY AND POWER... So the problem is being left to those who created the problem! And it's been this way for thousands of years, with a few bright spots that got squelched by those WITH MONEY AND POWER.

We have had some heroes (I'm American, so I'll stick to Americans) who tried to set our ship to rights, like Lincoln, FDR, JFK... But when Big Money can come in and kill them, and undo their ideas, that's a problem!

Transparency is a subheading under Law, I would say. And while it is absolutely necessary, without question, it won't matter that much if the LAWS we have in place can be UNDONE by moneyed interests... BIG, BIG money. When money gets really really big, people seem to loose their integrity. Seems to me THAT is a vital issue, just as vital, if not more so, than transparency. Does that make sense? I'm saying that we must find a good way to ENSURE that money cannot influence the LAW and the political machinery...

There are good ideas STILL OUT THERE, and more coming... Check out Matthew Ehret... he's a great source of history and what I'm talking about here, because if we understand how things have gone before, we strengthen what we do now and in the future. I think there's PLENTY of room for PLENTY of voices on these issues. Centralized power is a HUGE ISSUE, in my view.

Expand full comment

that's the way it should have always been

Expand full comment

And anonymous accounts are analyzing it because they will be smeared and shut down if their name is revealed in public.

Expand full comment

Fauci & Co are probably scheming at this very moment to shut them down.

Expand full comment

OUR SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED.

This is our #1 issue. We cannot rank anything higher than this issue. It is an issue we can and should all agree on. All political sides and all people.

It is like having a computer that has been hacked and corrupted. When we sit here arguing about hot button issues that is like arguing about what programs run better on the corrupted computer. NONE of them run better. Not until we fix the system. We have to put all of our attention on focusing the ACTUAL SYSTEM first. It's not that hard to do actually. We just need a movement. A decentralized one. And a plan.

What is the solution? Our systems have been corrupted by regulatory capture and special interest groups - we can't expect the system to fix itself. We need a NEW idea. One that makes the old one obsolete.

If our problem is systemic corruption the best cure is radical FORCED TRANSPARENCY.

I beg all of you to read this:

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/what-we-need-is-a-transparency-movement

Expand full comment

Data and reality are extremely antivaxx and transphobic!

Expand full comment

And I just found out that truth is a "trigger" as well.

Expand full comment

"Data and reality are extremely antivaxx and transphobic!" And raaaaacist too!

Expand full comment

There we are!

Expand full comment

You forgot Rayyy -cyst!!!

Expand full comment

i have a terrible cyst

Expand full comment

lol!

Expand full comment

"Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen."

~ Friedrich Nietzsche

Expand full comment

One of the great truths of history.

Expand full comment

From a nihilist no less!

Expand full comment

The State is, by far, the most murderous, anti-human organization in history.

In just over the last century alone, it has slaughtered some 250 million people, most of them its own citizens.

Whether one lives under the yoke of, and pays tribute to, Biden, Zelensky, Macron, Trudeau, Putin or any of the other parasitic mountebanks and monsters ruling most of the planet, one's liberty and prosperity is infringed upon and at risk to one degree or another.

What never ceases to amaze me is that despite a nearly endless train of abuses and atrocities, vast numbers of people not only continue to cheer their own enslavement, but are willing to fight and kill the slaves of another ruler.

In order to become truly civilized, the State must be consigned to the dustbin of history.

No more rulers.

Expand full comment

Data cooking is the last refuge of a scoundrel!

Expand full comment

It's like, like oh, revisionist history!!!

Expand full comment

serial revisionist recidivist?

Expand full comment

Zactly! Dropped out of an advanced degree program when an advisor said "we must get rid of the traditional white male canon". Stop the focus on anything to do with the development of western civilization and focus on obscure sources from approved races and preferred gender (not male in case you were wondering)...this in a faculty/grad student meeting. This was back in the early 90s. So, it was a constant struggle back then to present history in a factual, objective manner because if you didn't toe the PC gender-bender line, oh, you didn't get funding or maybe you wouldn't pass your exams...

Expand full comment

Yup. They're pencil whipping. It's a parking lot deal with the big pharma.

Expand full comment

Gotta an itch, the glitch, is a data ditch, with a narrative switch...we da' snitch...whatta bitch.....

Expand full comment

Mic drop! Master RG 😜

Expand full comment

Good job!!! I am impressed!

Expand full comment

Well, look. Didn't at least one municipality have its essential infrastructure software hacked because the system was decades out of date?

The incompetence starts with the morons they hire and promote. But I'd certainly think a heavy dose of malfeasance has been stirred into the sludge they keep trying to force down our throats.

Expand full comment

That is NOT pleasant imagery!

Expand full comment

Tastes awful, too.

Expand full comment

"Voltage irregularity".

Right.

I've installed and run many server farms since the mid-90's, progressing from 20+ servers in my garage to 100's of boxes in co-location facilities.

Even back in the day we had redundant power supplies and backup power units with voltage regulators.

Never once did I, or anyone I worked with, have a server go down due to power issues.

Although, given it is the Feds, they could be running the entire show on some ancient Dell shitbox running Windows 2000 Server plugged into a wall socket in the janitor's closet (not all that far off from what I've actually seen), this does not come close to passing the smell test.

Expand full comment

His derogatory remarks are likely not far from the truth. Between mid 1980s-1990s, I worked as a contractor for a very large U.S. government agency network. While I did not work the field, I had plenty of phone experience with techs at hundreds of U.S. government offices both in and outside the USA. Our network consisted of various hardware ranging in value from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars each, and they were installed in locations that were specifically designed for such equipment (data centers) down to dubious rural offices where they box was plugged into unreliable power and the dust filters were never cleaned. It's amazing the gear worked as well as it did, given the often warehouse-like environments it had to operate in.

Expand full comment

Yes, rural power is notoriously dirty. There are those things (can't remember the term for them just this moment-Argh!) looked into them at one time! that helps bolster and even it up, essential for many applications. Wow, SD!

Expand full comment

Surge protectors? The big boxy kind.

Expand full comment

Sadly, the most reliable part of the setup you describe will be the wall socket in the janitor's closet.

Expand full comment

Calif is cooking their positive test data, and it is easy, because lots of unvaxxed out here have to test to keep their jobs, so the datat set is biased and never corrected. Check out the data, we unvaxxed, who are all testing positive, should all be dead, because we are over 5X as likely to test positive!!! Killer 🤡 Government.

https://covid19.ca.gov/state-dashboard/#postvax-status

Expand full comment

Those graphs are so horribly deceptive, because, as you say, employers are forcing unvaxxed to test more than vaxxed. California's reported data would be more honest if it were as Walgreen's in my comment above: Report the positive tests divided by all tests, rather than by 100,000 population. Then we could see a more reliable rate of positivity for each cohort.

Expand full comment

Better still, start questioning the TESTS. When doctors and hospitals are getting financial kickbacks for everything Covid, we would do WELL to follow the money.

Expand full comment

Yes, PCR is abysmal for testing infectious disease, as inventor Kary Mullis had warned, and he did not invent it for that purpose. The public's lack of knowledge of the variability of cycle thresholds, and the wild variation in the same from place to place and over the COVID era, allowed the absurd charade to take root and flourish.

Expand full comment

Indeed.

On another note, I am full of excitement and hope because today I learned that there is a federal case that's been filed... https://jdfor2024.com/2022/05/dr-david-martin-provides-explosive-evidence-and-summary-of-litigation/

and

prosecutenow.com gives you the summary...

CRIMINAL INDICTMENTS UNDERWAY... If anybody can get this done, it's David Martin and Leslie Manookian and George Wentz...

Expand full comment

The fact that David E. Martin has gone (through my inputs) very quiet for some months led me to start asking where he is, fearing "suicide" or "covid" or "heart attack" or whatever else those African Presidents die of.

The fact that he has now appeared twice in so many days on different platforms suggests to me he has been working on a BIG case, which is GREAT news.

Expand full comment

Yeah! And your thinking was like mine... Where is he? Now we know. That guy has been following this PLANNED coup d'etat since about the year 2000... The Bad Guys tried to get him to join their gang, but he said No. I'd love to see him as our President... He's not only freakin' brilliant, but he's Not For Sale. Cheers!

Expand full comment

And you think the "tests" are valid? And... harmless? Asking for a fiend.

Expand full comment

Haha, just like Brix, I hope the tests are harmless, or my wife and I are going to have some "rare" nose cancer.

Expand full comment

Well, if you're getting one of those long nasal swabs (wonder why a simple cheek swab no longer works? Hmm), you may be having just a little dab of graphene inserted into your nasal cavity right close to the blood/brain barrier. I'm not saying they're ALL tainted, these swabs, but-- wanna take a chance?

Expand full comment

Are you saying the government doesn't have my best interests at heart??? Noooo, color me surprised!

Expand full comment

LOL. Cheers. I'm the new dog in the cat room, so I don't know y'all. Seems like a good spot, tho! ^_^

Expand full comment

Ha Ha! I see what you did there! Clever!

Expand full comment

Asking for a FIEND! Fiends are why we are in this mess! LOL

Expand full comment

Damn straight, Skippy! I was trying to make a joke... guess it was a bad one. :P ^_^

Expand full comment

I always wonder what the heck is going on with the tests. My daughter works in a rehab-nursing facility, and has been there for 3 years and through all of this. She herself got covid in November 2020, and since her recovery from that she has had to do the ridiculous tests twice a week, so that's a heck of a lot of tests. Only one time did she test positive, and since she wasn't sick she tested again the next day and it was negative. So all these tests and only one false positive. We're in the foothills area above Sacramento, and I don't know of any entity in Calif. gets the data from all these tests of employees in hospitals and nursing homes.

Expand full comment

California also hasn't published final death stats for 2021. Only provisional, which doesn't include deaths that haven't been certified because cause of death may be in question. They released 2020 final #s around April or May of 2021. Significant delay this year.

Expand full comment

I don't find that fact surprising.

The Calif gov claimed that the shots were safe and effective, our own "California COVID-19 Scientific Safety Review Workgroup" said so!! Now, they may have to own the civil and criminal liability of lying and fraud. Whoops, nothing to see here!!! Of course, in the end, they'll just say they were lied to, like good politicians, and pass the buck.

Expand full comment

You say “they got caught.” If nobody heard about their malfeasance, and you tell the believers about how you read about the CDC fudging the data on substack and nobody believes they cheated even a little bit—did they really get caught?

Expand full comment

I don’t believe in coincidences…

Expand full comment

As a conspiracy analyst, all coincidences are signals.

IMO all the signs now are to throw the scent off the hunt.

It's hard to tell where you're going when there's too many signs.

Part of the cover-up

Expand full comment

Totally agree, Ryan.

Expand full comment

What they don't know is that eventually a confused mind says no.

But it's been the biggest Glengarry Glen Ross hard sell of all time. .

I think there's some hope we're hitting a tipping point. .

But it doesn't end until the masks are completely rejected

Expand full comment

The masks have always been key for me since day one. The signal a mask sends about one's fear, compliance without question, and "going along to get along" is a flashing neon sign to those who want to destroy us. It amazes me that if people would have just said hell NO to the face diapers we may not have ended up where we are. People filled with completely neurotic and irrational fear chose to give away everything good in their lives for the fake security of a rag over their face. I'll be baffled by it until the day I die. Literal insanity on display.

Expand full comment

SAME here. Stunned me how many people were comfortable being de-oxygenized. And even then, holding their breath in fear when they had to be around a NAKED FACE. And even then, holding their breath when they had to be CLOSER THAN 6 FEET away, even with a masked face.

The whole mask thing just made me so sad, and so angry, b/c I am in CA and it really interfered with my life. Not just shopping, or wanting to go to the library, or see the dentist (I would shop in neighboring county, until I began to be brave enough to just go into stores unmasked; library I had to give up; dentist I capitulated for necessary filling but not sure I could again). I actually quit my job over this, bc I wouldn't take wearing one and testing weekly as the "accommodation" offered for my unjabbedness. I make half my former wage now, no bennies. Whatever.

100% a control symbol.

FUCK THAT SHIT.

REFUSE.

Expand full comment

I would invite you to Texas but we need fighters to stay in states like CA and win them back! Stay strong and keep fighting!

Expand full comment

****FUCK THAT SHIT. REFUSE****

ALERT:

Read Michelle's post.

IMPORTANT.

Harness it!

Expand full comment

Couldn't have said it better myself.

You literally sound like me.

Word for word.

Mask are the linchpin. Period.

It was the testing of the waters that let the Titanic sail.

People are still folding deck chairs.

Bottom line is they're meant to humiliate.

Nobody thinks well when they're humiliated.

Think about it.

Expand full comment

You add FEAR on top of humiliation. Anything can be done. Including, previously normal people getting off on poisoning people.

Watch this when you get a chance:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mcCLm_LwpE

It'll give you chills. Conducted by a 3rd grade teacher in the late 60's.

Pass it around.

Expand full comment

That was a wonderful learning experience. Maybe this should be done, instead of CRT.

Expand full comment

I agree, that is key. Great movie reference, btw.

Expand full comment

You know what's the funniest part about this nonsense?; they've all turned into Jack Lemmons character in the movie.

They're panicking.

Expand full comment

“Coffee is for closers!”

Expand full comment

The credentialed class is desperate to cover up their incompetence, because if the sheep realize they've been fleeced, the consequences will be severe.

Expand full comment

"the consequences will be severe" And soon. I pray the credentialist incompetocrats will face the inevitable consequences soon.

Expand full comment

I can sympathize, and I have been known to make such similar optimistic predictions. Alas, my Cynics Guild membership requires that I inquire: "It's been apparent for a very long time, to anyone who had eyes to see. If most people didn't see if six months or two years ago, please provide a credible argument for why they would notice now?"

Expand full comment

Now they know people who've been fucked by the vaccines. Some people can't learn by the mistakes of others.

Expand full comment

The cognitive dissonance is strong in people, as you say.

David E. Martin 1hr interview on USA watchdog which I will watch on Rumble when I get the chance https://www.goyimtv.tv/v/3632264738/Greg-Hunter-USA-WATCHDOG--700-Million-Worldwide-Will-Die-from-CV19-Vax-by-2028-%E2%80%93-Dr-David-Martin... To come up with a prediction "700 Million Worldwide Will Die from CV19 Vax by 2028" is bold will be interesting to see what is the basis for it. Is that through damage already done, or when will enough people overcome their cognitive dissonance and just say "no"?

Expand full comment

They need to get their Great Reset, good and hard.

Expand full comment

You are being kind to suggest incompetence. Everything the masterminds have done is willful intent.

Expand full comment

Just asked the missus what is the % chance she attributes to jabs = mass genocide.

She said 0.

I said it can't be 0. She will not engage with the discussion, for her own sanity. Fair enough.

Keeping it simple I would say premeditated genocide 10% incompetence & cover-up 90%

Someone smarter than me should try to put together a graphic with all the interlocking issues and motives and actors and try to estimate what is going on in probabilistic terms. Perhaps allowing "users" to "vote" their own estimates for sampling purposes. That would be neat.

Expand full comment

100% for me. This is no mistake

Expand full comment

A great discussion. Thank you. Every time I think, yes this is it, the game is over, the jig is up or whatever, I am outfoxed by another round of, we are all going to die from the covid and climate change maniacs. Thanks for confirming my suspicions. Data is being manipulated, disappeared, and tampered with. Aren’t there laws to prevent this.

Expand full comment

They'll find another war to blame this on

Expand full comment

You mean after the ukraine fiasco?

Expand full comment

Yes!...Right?!

They're pretty good at that trick.

50 years of endless wars, sucking us dry, with nothing to show, but everything for them to hide...and gain!

Fuck them!

Expand full comment

The coincidences are piling up like a winter's stock of cordwood. They are stacking so deep and high that they are teetering on collapse! Messing with the data is a hard and fast rule of Big Pharma. My husband Dr. Breggin has documented Big Pharma manipulating data going back to the clinical trials and release of Prozac and other SSRIs-- detailed in our book Talking Back to Prozac. Also see how Paxil data was manipulated in Dr. Breggin's 3 part scientific paper:

Breggin 2006a, Paxil GSK Special Report Part I

Breggin 2006b, Paxil GSK Special Report Part II

Breggin 2006c, Paxil GSK Special Report Part III

You can find that paper series here: https://breggin.com/Antidepressant-Drugs-Scientific-Resources

(and pardon our website 'dust' we are upgrading).

Expand full comment

Good point. Statins used a similar method. Sure they lower cholesterol, but overall mortality doesn't change, or gets marginally worse over time. The false correlation is akin to stopping breast cancer by not wearing a brassiere, because 95% of breast cancer victims wear a bra!

Expand full comment

Still have that book, too; bought a copy when it came out. A keeper. Explained a lot, for me. I still tell folks to read it.

Expand full comment

Thank you Michele—that was 1994 and feels like a lifetime ago. I am amazed looking back how much we were being prepared to analyze the COVID crisis when we were doing crucial evaluations of biological psychiatry. Turned out to be an early component of transhumanism.

Expand full comment

I have absolutely no doubt at all it's malevolent.

Two and a half years of giving them the benefit of the doubt is two and a half years too long.

Expand full comment

I'm thinking 10% incompetence and 90% willful suppression.

Expand full comment