160 Comments

Here's who's not hiding the data: Walgreens.

Week after week, for those who test through Walgreens, broken down by vax and dose status, they've shown generally dose-dependent greater COVID positivity, or no beneficial effect of the vaccines against COVID positivity.

https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp

See page 3.

Expand full comment

Data and reality are extremely antivaxx and transphobic!

Expand full comment
founding

"Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen."

~ Friedrich Nietzsche

Expand full comment

Data cooking is the last refuge of a scoundrel!

Expand full comment
founding
Jun 29, 2022·edited Jun 29, 2022

Gotta an itch, the glitch, is a data ditch, with a narrative switch...we da' snitch...whatta bitch.....

Expand full comment

Well, look. Didn't at least one municipality have its essential infrastructure software hacked because the system was decades out of date?

The incompetence starts with the morons they hire and promote. But I'd certainly think a heavy dose of malfeasance has been stirred into the sludge they keep trying to force down our throats.

Expand full comment
founding

"Voltage irregularity".

Right.

I've installed and run many server farms since the mid-90's, progressing from 20+ servers in my garage to 100's of boxes in co-location facilities.

Even back in the day we had redundant power supplies and backup power units with voltage regulators.

Never once did I, or anyone I worked with, have a server go down due to power issues.

Although, given it is the Feds, they could be running the entire show on some ancient Dell shitbox running Windows 2000 Server plugged into a wall socket in the janitor's closet (not all that far off from what I've actually seen), this does not come close to passing the smell test.

Expand full comment

Calif is cooking their positive test data, and it is easy, because lots of unvaxxed out here have to test to keep their jobs, so the datat set is biased and never corrected. Check out the data, we unvaxxed, who are all testing positive, should all be dead, because we are over 5X as likely to test positive!!! Killer 🤡 Government.

https://covid19.ca.gov/state-dashboard/#postvax-status

Expand full comment

You say “they got caught.” If nobody heard about their malfeasance, and you tell the believers about how you read about the CDC fudging the data on substack and nobody believes they cheated even a little bit—did they really get caught?

Expand full comment

I don’t believe in coincidences…

Expand full comment

The credentialed class is desperate to cover up their incompetence, because if the sheep realize they've been fleeced, the consequences will be severe.

Expand full comment

A great discussion. Thank you. Every time I think, yes this is it, the game is over, the jig is up or whatever, I am outfoxed by another round of, we are all going to die from the covid and climate change maniacs. Thanks for confirming my suspicions. Data is being manipulated, disappeared, and tampered with. Aren’t there laws to prevent this.

Expand full comment
founding

They'll find another war to blame this on

Expand full comment

The coincidences are piling up like a winter's stock of cordwood. They are stacking so deep and high that they are teetering on collapse! Messing with the data is a hard and fast rule of Big Pharma. My husband Dr. Breggin has documented Big Pharma manipulating data going back to the clinical trials and release of Prozac and other SSRIs-- detailed in our book Talking Back to Prozac. Also see how Paxil data was manipulated in Dr. Breggin's 3 part scientific paper:

Breggin 2006a, Paxil GSK Special Report Part I

Breggin 2006b, Paxil GSK Special Report Part II

Breggin 2006c, Paxil GSK Special Report Part III

You can find that paper series here: https://breggin.com/Antidepressant-Drugs-Scientific-Resources

(and pardon our website 'dust' we are upgrading).

Expand full comment

I have absolutely no doubt at all it's malevolent.

Two and a half years of giving them the benefit of the doubt is two and a half years too long.

Expand full comment

I'm thinking 10% incompetence and 90% willful suppression.

Expand full comment