I considered this seriously myself. The fanatical drive to get the jabs into small children (not at risk from Covid) didn't make sense, unless it was a plan to sterilize them (having not yet bred, unlike older people who have already had their children). The jabs were introduced in older populations first (because they were the populatio…
I considered this seriously myself. The fanatical drive to get the jabs into small children (not at risk from Covid) didn't make sense, unless it was a plan to sterilize them (having not yet bred, unlike older people who have already had their children). The jabs were introduced in older populations first (because they were the populations most at risk from Covid), but the kids were always the target, hence the insane, and otherwise needless, approval for the injection younger and younger people. They seemed desperate to jab as many children and young adults as possible before the shine wore off. I figured if the jab is something well less than 100% effective at sterilizing, it was necessary to jab as many kids as possible to bring the numbers (of sterilizations) up enough for them to become statistically relevant in the future (i.e., reducing population growth by some pre-determined target). As you say, the direct deaths were a "bonus," but probably unwelcome, because their revelation might eventually (and probably did) impede vaxx acceptance as the public became aware of an apparent problem (e.g., "died suddenly"). The direct deaths may have, in fact, caused the plotters to miss their target goals in young people.
Agree, solid additional ruminations from the core thought I offered. El Gato Malo's mid/late 2022 posts about the drop in Swedish live births (which actually fell off on a curve matching their per capita vax uptake, lagged 9 months or so) were a pretty definitive confirmation, and other countries started trying to obscure or hide their birth stats. The elite have been huffing their population reduction ideology for many decades.
I considered this seriously myself. The fanatical drive to get the jabs into small children (not at risk from Covid) didn't make sense, unless it was a plan to sterilize them (having not yet bred, unlike older people who have already had their children). The jabs were introduced in older populations first (because they were the populations most at risk from Covid), but the kids were always the target, hence the insane, and otherwise needless, approval for the injection younger and younger people. They seemed desperate to jab as many children and young adults as possible before the shine wore off. I figured if the jab is something well less than 100% effective at sterilizing, it was necessary to jab as many kids as possible to bring the numbers (of sterilizations) up enough for them to become statistically relevant in the future (i.e., reducing population growth by some pre-determined target). As you say, the direct deaths were a "bonus," but probably unwelcome, because their revelation might eventually (and probably did) impede vaxx acceptance as the public became aware of an apparent problem (e.g., "died suddenly"). The direct deaths may have, in fact, caused the plotters to miss their target goals in young people.
Agree, solid additional ruminations from the core thought I offered. El Gato Malo's mid/late 2022 posts about the drop in Swedish live births (which actually fell off on a curve matching their per capita vax uptake, lagged 9 months or so) were a pretty definitive confirmation, and other countries started trying to obscure or hide their birth stats. The elite have been huffing their population reduction ideology for many decades.