The cognitive dissonance required to "fight autocracy" and silence peaceful, highly intellectual debate still fascinates me, even after losing all faith in humanity years ago.
I admit feeling a little burst of happiness when I see a visitor coming directly from Twitter, because it means that SOMEBODY is out there sharing my stuff and ensuring it gets out.
As far as the anti-vaxx 'misinformation' tags, isn't it weird how they aren't actually able to disprove the underlying claims and instead just call us names? (Not really, this has been the MO for a while)
I certainly appreciate the recommendation list from Señor Norteño! I didn't realize Graham Linehan was on Substack, for example. I'll check out the others when time permits.
Exciting to see James Roguski is getting so much traction. He is doing a tremendous service with his #StopTheWHO efforts. We've both joined forces with the World Council for Health to #StopTheAmendments, #StopTheTreaty, and #StopTheWHO. Below are a few posts for those who want to learn more and help us #StopTheWHO!
I'm subscribed to most of the Orange accounts and in a few minutes I'll be subscribed to all of them. Also that color was most definitely chosen because... wait for it... "Orange Man Bad!"
As an actual data scientist, meaning a longtime lab scientist who has turned his attention to data related scientific problems in industry, I almost always detest anyone who loudly declares themselves a data scientist. Usually they have modest modelling skills, maybe from a master's degree, can absolutely not hack the mathematical foundations of statistics, and want to appear as the voice of "the science" for reasons of online clout. These people have made me embarrassed to call myself by my rightful professional title and I just refer to myself as an R&D scientist so thatist. people know I am an actual trained scient
I was mentally formulating a comment as I reached EGM’s: “isn’t it curious how the “truth” of one side is so fragile that it cannot be allowed to be challenged and yet the “disinformation” of the other so robust that it constantly invites engagement and refutation and yet seems to remain standing?”.
So I don’t need to comment now.
And another thing…
The twitterarti (President of the Truth Ministry) has decided that Twitter should allow amendments to tweets, like Wikipedia which is never wrong. But only by people who are authorised and do never wrong. What could possibly go wrong? Warning: nausea ahead: https://video.reclaimthenet.org/articles/jank-vid-2.mp4
LOL… I should thank this guy as I’d missed some of these stacks. Great service he has provided to all of us!
All that guy did was give me a list of new authors to look up - hadn’t heard of most of them
*thumbs up*
I cannot begin to express my disappointment that Gatito Malo Malo is so low on the nefariousness list. Must. Try. Harder.
The cognitive dissonance required to "fight autocracy" and silence peaceful, highly intellectual debate still fascinates me, even after losing all faith in humanity years ago.
I admit feeling a little burst of happiness when I see a visitor coming directly from Twitter, because it means that SOMEBODY is out there sharing my stuff and ensuring it gets out.
As far as the anti-vaxx 'misinformation' tags, isn't it weird how they aren't actually able to disprove the underlying claims and instead just call us names? (Not really, this has been the MO for a while)
I certainly appreciate the recommendation list from Señor Norteño! I didn't realize Graham Linehan was on Substack, for example. I'll check out the others when time permits.
Exciting to see James Roguski is getting so much traction. He is doing a tremendous service with his #StopTheWHO efforts. We've both joined forces with the World Council for Health to #StopTheAmendments, #StopTheTreaty, and #StopTheWHO. Below are a few posts for those who want to learn more and help us #StopTheWHO!
• "Letter to the US HHS Office of Global Affairs" (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-us-hhs-office-of-global)
• "Letter to the WHO" (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-who)
Check out the announcements section for resources at the end of these posts:
• "Dialogue with a Curious Injectee" (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dialogue-with-a-curious-injectee)
• "Letter to the Menticided: A 12-Step Recovery Program" (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-menticided-a-12-step)
We just found a lawyer--in Canada no less--who'll sue an employer for firing The Dirty. They weren't around 6 months ago. Something's changed.
I would like to thank them for publishing this.
Now I can see which substack authors I am missing and should subscribe to :)
I'm subscribed to most of the Orange accounts and in a few minutes I'll be subscribed to all of them. Also that color was most definitely chosen because... wait for it... "Orange Man Bad!"
We got you, gato.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1525128834558963712
As an actual data scientist, meaning a longtime lab scientist who has turned his attention to data related scientific problems in industry, I almost always detest anyone who loudly declares themselves a data scientist. Usually they have modest modelling skills, maybe from a master's degree, can absolutely not hack the mathematical foundations of statistics, and want to appear as the voice of "the science" for reasons of online clout. These people have made me embarrassed to call myself by my rightful professional title and I just refer to myself as an R&D scientist so thatist. people know I am an actual trained scient
Love this! And I tweeted it with the caption: “ How wonderful! I found a bunch more awesome substack writers to follow! ” 😁😁😁
Wow. I love how someone can claim that something is disinformation or misinformation without supporting their accusation with any evidence.
Great cat pic!!! We should talk sometime. I emailed you my phone number
I was mentally formulating a comment as I reached EGM’s: “isn’t it curious how the “truth” of one side is so fragile that it cannot be allowed to be challenged and yet the “disinformation” of the other so robust that it constantly invites engagement and refutation and yet seems to remain standing?”.
So I don’t need to comment now.
And another thing…
The twitterarti (President of the Truth Ministry) has decided that Twitter should allow amendments to tweets, like Wikipedia which is never wrong. But only by people who are authorised and do never wrong. What could possibly go wrong? Warning: nausea ahead: https://video.reclaimthenet.org/articles/jank-vid-2.mp4
And it's all about to take an even more surreal turn as this whack-job-crack-pot Nina Jankowicz wants the power to edit Tweets for 'context'.
Here have a look. Warning if you click the video it will reveal cringe:
https://reclaimthenet.org/biden-disinformation-chief-said-verified-users-like-her-should-be-able-to-edit-tweets/